• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Presentation of petitions to remain private - further protection for debtor companies affected by COVID-19

Alongside the Corporate Insolvency & Governance Act 2000 ("CIGA") coming into force (read more here), the associated Insolvency Practice Direction was released.

The new practice direction provides for additional protections for companies who face a winding up petition presented as a result of coronavirus-related financial difficulties.

It was several months ago that the court started putting into effect the government's plans to prevent a winding up order being made against a company where its financial difficulties were caused by coronavirus (the "Coronavirus Test") (see examples here).  The CIGA is now in force and the provision preventing the making of a winding up order applies (at the moment) until 30 September 2020.

However, whilst the court were willing to refuse to grant a winding up order where the company's difficulties arose from the effects of coronavirus, there was nothing to stop a creditor from presenting the petition in the first place.  Even the presentation of a winding up petition can be enough to put the final nail in the coffin of an already suffering company, even if the court then goes on to refuse to make the winding up order.  Once presented, the existence of the petition could be ascertained by anyone searching the public register and, unless the company was quick to apply for an injunction preventing the advertisement of the petition, the company would very shortly see their bank freeze their accounts - further damaging the company's finances. 

The new insolvency practice direction seeks to address this loophole.  The practice direction provides that when a petition is presented to court its existence will remain private until the court has had the opportunity to determine the outcome of the Coronavirus Test.  Importantly, the petition will not appear on any public search of the register until that point has been determined.

The petition must still be served on the company but it will be initially listed for a non-attendance pre-trial review at least 28 days after presentation. The purpose of the pre-trial review  is to enable the court to consider the petition and, if appropriate, list the matter for a preliminary hearing to consider the Coronavirus Test.  Prior to any preliminary hearing, both parties will have the opportunity to file evidence and they will be entitled to appear at the hearing to make representations.

Depending on the outcome of the pre-trial review and preliminary hearing, the court will either dismiss the petition or allow it to proceed to be listed in the winding up petitions list (and appear on public searches and be advertised in the London Gazette accordingly).

This is an important development for debtor companies - although they previously had protection from the making of the winding up order, they could not guarantee that a particularly aggressive creditor wouldn't take their chances with the court and present the petition anyway - causing irreparable damage to the company's reputation and finances.

Our thinking

  • Key Developments in International Arbitration for 2026

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • M&A in UK financial services - will mega-deals in 2025 lead to more mid-market activity in 2026?

    Mike Barrington

    Quick Reads

  • Hong Kong finalises VA dealer licensing and consults on VA advisors/managers — how it compares to today’s Type 1/4/9 “VA uplift”

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

  • TechRound quotes Charlotte Hill and Vadim Romanoff on their 2026 cryptocurrency and digital assets predictions

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • New Cryptoasset Reporting Framework (CARF) implemented - how might it affect you?

    Vadim Romanoff

    Quick Reads

  • Law360 quotes Charlotte Hill on the FCA's new crypto rules potentially paving the way for 'bad actors'

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA): What the UK’s new consumer rules now mean for consumer facing businesses

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • UAE CCL Reforms: Introducing Multi-Class Shares, Drag / Tag Rights, Deadlock Solutions and Governance Continuity

    Mo Nawash

    Quick Reads

  • Why the UK Still Deserves a Seat at the Table for Family Offices and Investment Fund Structures

    Vadim Romanoff

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Vadim Romanoff on the possibility of a bank surcharge hike in the 2025 Budget

    Vadim Romanoff

    In the Press

  • Vadim Romanoff and Matthew Griffin write for EPrivateClient on the UK's attractiveness for Family Offices and Investment Funds ahead of the 2025 Budget

    Vadim Romanoff

    In the Press

  • From Westminster to Worli - Why Prenups Matter in Modern Marriage

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

  • Bloomberg quotes Greg Stonefield on asset manager Blue Owl restricting investor redemptions

    Greg Stonefield

    In the Press

  • Navigating Regulation (EU) 2019/880: implementation in Italy and competent authorities for the New European Framework for Importing Works of Arts

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    Quick Reads

  • Bank of England Consultation: Proposed Regulatory Regime for Sterling-Denominated Systemic Stablecoins

    Charlotte Hill

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters its Corporate team with the appointment of Ed Morgan

    David Collins

    News

  • In-Depth Virtual Currency Regulation

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands Corporate Tax and Incentives team with the appointment of Vadim Romanoff

    David Collins

    News

  • The Times quotes Charlotte Hill on the history and decline of Investment Clubs

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Strengthening Financial Integrity: Switzerland’s New Register of Beneficial Owners

    Alexia Egger Castillo

    Insights

Back to top