• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Five principles to help “level up” your trade mark and brands game

I have spent the past 20 years helping clients with their trade marks and brands. That work is focused on the sports, retail, F&B and tech sectors. Sometimes I work directly with inhouse lawyers. As often as not though, I am advising non-lawyers: founders, CEOs, FDs and Commercial Directors. It is fair to say that, as smart as many of them are – lawyers and non-lawyers – very few of the clients I work with would class themselves as IP specialists. That is, of course fine, and that is what we are here for: we provide specialist advice to give our clients an edge and help them make their businesses more valuable.

While trade mark law can be deeply complex and nuanced, here I want to share some simple principles that may help non-IP specialists to “level up” their trade mark and brands game.

1. Use it or risk losing it. Filing a trade mark and achieving registration is not the end of the story. In the UK and EU, once it is registered you have a five year grace period during which it is immune from attack on the basis of non-use. After than point, if you are not using it, it may be vulnerable to cancellation. Other countries have very similar rules.  

2. Trade marks are territorial. That means your trade mark will cover a specific territory and will not have effect outside it. That is usually a country but it can also cover a particular bloc, the EU trade mark being the most prominent example. Yes, this can get complicated. For example, the UK’s departure from the EU creates complexity and how online use is dealt with can be tricky. Understanding the basic territorial nature of trade marks though is important and this is why we encourage our clients to focus on what their key territories are.   

3. You are covered for the goods and services you specify. There are 45 different classes of goods and services. At one end of the spectrum, your mark may be registered simply for clothing, which is in class 25, or “sporting services” – class 41. At the other end, it could be registered for a huge array of different goods and services, spanning multiple classes. While you may possibly have certain rights to use the trade mark to prevent people from using a similar mark for goods or services other than those specified in your registration, the starting point is that you are covered for what you include.

4. Trade marks operate on the basis of similarity. When looking at whether someone is infringing your trade mark, or they are infringing yours, you need to think about how similar the marks are, and how similar the goods or services are. Other factors come into play but those lie at the heart of the matter.

5. Owning a domain name does not mean you have the right to use it to do business. Whether you have the right will usually come down to the trade mark position.

***

All of that is hugely simplified, and there are usually numerous other factors that may need to be considered in any particular case. Getting a handle on those five principles though can help take you a long way forward.

Our thinking

  • New FIBA Rule on Payment to Agents

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Quick Reads

  • International Arbitration: 2024 in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Corporate deal round-up H2 2024

    David Coates

    Insights

  • Combatting Lookalikes Revisited - clouds lift for brand owners as Thatchers wins its appeal over Aldi copycat cider

    Mary Bagnall

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Mary Bagnall on Aldi’s infringement of Thatchers’ trademark

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • Why Man City took ‘Super “Dry”’ off its Training Kit

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • They think it’s all over … it is now! Are the changes to non-dom status an own goal against our footballers?

    Joshua Green

    Quick Reads

  • Sports media rights and recent changes to the UK “Listed Events” regime

    Richard Davies

    Insights

  • Keir Gordon and Molly Moseley write for City AM on the Miami Dolphins and Buffalo Bills becoming the first NFL teams to sign private equity deals

    Keir Gordon

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Mary Bagnall on the Thatchers v Aldi trademark appeal

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • Driving Growth & Innovation with Pan-African Sports Industry Leaders

    Adrian Mayer

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys ‘Client Conversations’ welcomes one of England’s most celebrated male cricketers of the past thirty years, Mark Ramprakash

    Simon Ridpath

    News

  • Client Conversations Podcast: Mark Ramprakash

    Simon Ridpath

    Podcasts

  • An Overview of the Court of Arbitration for Sport

    Benoît Pasquier

    Insights

  • The Use of Arbitration in Resolving Sports Disputes

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Charlotte Duly writes for The Law Society Gazette on the Skykick Supreme Court decision and takeaways for trade mark owners

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • English Rugby En Francais: Does farewell to England mean au revoir to English Law?

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

  • "AI Battlefields" Conference - Some Highlights

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the long-awaited SkyKick v Sky Supreme Court decision

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Charlotte Duly writes for World Intellectual Property Review on the Bluebird trademark dispute

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

Back to top