• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

A tenant-friendly time (for now) - no winding up order for defaulting tenant

We now have further evidence of the court's willingness to act within the spirit of the Corporate Insolvency & Governance Bill ("CIG Bill").  

Although some in the industry have expressed a fundamental concern over the courts relying on the wording of a bill which is not yet even law, this did not stop Mr Justice Morgan from quoting directly from it in the case of Re A Company (Injunction to Restrain Presentation of a Petition) [2020].

Mr Justice Morgan stated that the policy behind the CIG Bill is "self evident" but also referred to a "number of ministerial statements as to the Government's commitment to enact [the] legislation" stating that he felt a "high degree of confidence" that the sections of the CIG Bill relied upon would be enacted more or less in their current form.

The case before Mr Justice Morgan was an application for an injunction to prevent the presentation of a winding up petition for non-payment of rent.  Mr Justice Morgan relied directly on the wording of Schedule 10 of the CIG Bill which provides for a restriction on the presentation of a winding up petition based on an unpaid statutory demand served between 1 March 2020 and 30 June 2020.  The company was able to adduce to the court evidence that coronavirus had had a financial effect on the company (one of the provisions of the CIG Bill) and accordingly granted the injunction was granted.

This is not the first case before the court where tenants have sought to rely on the CIG Bill.  A previous case (discussed here) resulted in a similar outcome.  

It therefore seems that those trying to get a winding up petition into court ahead of the CIG Bill becoming law will be given short shrift by the court and this latest case provides a helpful precedent for tenants - but there remains a query as to whether the court is also setting an unintended precedent of allowing reliance on the provisions of a bill which has not yet even had its second reading and this is surely a risky precedent to set.

...no petition for the winding up of a registered company may be presented under section 124 of the 1986 Act on or after 27 April 2020 on the ground specified in section 123(1)(a) (i.e. non-compliance with a statutory demand) where the demand is served during the relevant period which begins on 1 March 2020 and ends on 30 June 2020 (or one month after the coming into force of schedule 10, whichever is later).

Our thinking

  • In-Depth Virtual Currency Regulation

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands Corporate Tax and Incentives team with the appointment of Vadim Romanoff

    David Collins

    News

  • The Times quotes Charlotte Hill on the history and decline of Investment Clubs

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Strengthening Financial Integrity: Switzerland’s New Register of Beneficial Owners

    Alexia Egger Castillo

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Token Bay Capital on launch of the Token Bay Capital II LP

    Gaven Cheong

    News

  • Legal Analysis – Judgment handed down in Greensill case between Credit Suisse and Softbank

    James Hyne

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys continues to build Funds and Investment Management practice

    David Collins

    News

  • SFC allows intermediaries to provide VA staking services and VA funds to allow subscriptions/redemptions in-kind

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

  • Charlotte Hill writes for i-Law Compliance Monitor on the impact of 'failure to prevent fraud' legislation on compliance officers

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys adds Corporate, Fintech, IP and Art Law team in Milan with Arrival of Annapaola Negri-Clementi and Team

    Nicola Saccardo

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens cross-border corporate and commercial capabilities with the appointment of Gustina Singgih

    David Collins

    News

  • Tricky traps in the UK’s Statutory Residence Test

    Carolyn Steppler

    Insights

  • Regulating for Growth: The FCA and the Bank of England on Innovation and Risk

    Charlotte Hill

    Insights

  • FT Ignites Asia quotes Gaven Cheong on the impact of the proposed virtual asset dealing licence on asset managers in Hong Kong

    Gaven Cheong

    In the Press

  • Navigating the APAC Fund Landscape: H1 2025 Recap, Updates & Outlook

    Gaven Cheong

    Events

  • Update: Rent Reviews: No More Up, Up, and Away!

    Sarah Keens

    Quick Reads

  • Navigating Hong Kong’s New OTC Derivatives Regime : A Primer for Type 9 Asset Managers

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Invicta Global Holdings on its c.£11.8 million acquisition of Spaldings

    Alexis Karim

    News

  • FCA Multi-Firm Review of Algorithmic Trading Controls: What is says, why it matters, and what firms should do now

    Charlotte Hill

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Qraft Group on launch of the Qraft Soliton Fund

    Gaven Cheong

    News

Back to top