• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

A tenant-friendly time (for now) - no winding up order for defaulting tenant

We now have further evidence of the court's willingness to act within the spirit of the Corporate Insolvency & Governance Bill ("CIG Bill").  

Although some in the industry have expressed a fundamental concern over the courts relying on the wording of a bill which is not yet even law, this did not stop Mr Justice Morgan from quoting directly from it in the case of Re A Company (Injunction to Restrain Presentation of a Petition) [2020].

Mr Justice Morgan stated that the policy behind the CIG Bill is "self evident" but also referred to a "number of ministerial statements as to the Government's commitment to enact [the] legislation" stating that he felt a "high degree of confidence" that the sections of the CIG Bill relied upon would be enacted more or less in their current form.

The case before Mr Justice Morgan was an application for an injunction to prevent the presentation of a winding up petition for non-payment of rent.  Mr Justice Morgan relied directly on the wording of Schedule 10 of the CIG Bill which provides for a restriction on the presentation of a winding up petition based on an unpaid statutory demand served between 1 March 2020 and 30 June 2020.  The company was able to adduce to the court evidence that coronavirus had had a financial effect on the company (one of the provisions of the CIG Bill) and accordingly granted the injunction was granted.

This is not the first case before the court where tenants have sought to rely on the CIG Bill.  A previous case (discussed here) resulted in a similar outcome.  

It therefore seems that those trying to get a winding up petition into court ahead of the CIG Bill becoming law will be given short shrift by the court and this latest case provides a helpful precedent for tenants - but there remains a query as to whether the court is also setting an unintended precedent of allowing reliance on the provisions of a bill which has not yet even had its second reading and this is surely a risky precedent to set.

...no petition for the winding up of a registered company may be presented under section 124 of the 1986 Act on or after 27 April 2020 on the ground specified in section 123(1)(a) (i.e. non-compliance with a statutory demand) where the demand is served during the relevant period which begins on 1 March 2020 and ends on 30 June 2020 (or one month after the coming into force of schedule 10, whichever is later).

Our thinking

  • Law360 quotes Charlotte Hill on AI accountability for senior managers

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • United Arab Emirates issues a new Civil Transactions law

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Key Developments in International Arbitration for 2026

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • M&A in UK financial services - will mega-deals in 2025 lead to more mid-market activity in 2026?

    Mike Barrington

    Quick Reads

  • Hong Kong finalises VA dealer licensing and consults on VA advisors/managers — how it compares to today’s Type 1/4/9 “VA uplift”

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

  • TechRound quotes Charlotte Hill and Vadim Romanoff on their 2026 cryptocurrency and digital assets predictions

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • New Cryptoasset Reporting Framework (CARF) implemented - how might it affect you?

    Vadim Romanoff

    Quick Reads

  • Law360 quotes Charlotte Hill on the FCA's new crypto rules potentially paving the way for 'bad actors'

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA): What the UK’s new consumer rules now mean for consumer facing businesses

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • UAE CCL Reforms: Introducing Multi-Class Shares, Drag / Tag Rights, Deadlock Solutions and Governance Continuity

    Mo Nawash

    Quick Reads

  • Why the UK Still Deserves a Seat at the Table for Family Offices and Investment Fund Structures

    Vadim Romanoff

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Vadim Romanoff on the possibility of a bank surcharge hike in the 2025 Budget

    Vadim Romanoff

    In the Press

  • Vadim Romanoff and Matthew Griffin write for EPrivateClient on the UK's attractiveness for Family Offices and Investment Funds ahead of the 2025 Budget

    Vadim Romanoff

    In the Press

  • From Westminster to Worli - Why Prenups Matter in Modern Marriage

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

  • Bloomberg quotes Greg Stonefield on asset manager Blue Owl restricting investor redemptions

    Greg Stonefield

    In the Press

  • Navigating Regulation (EU) 2019/880: implementation in Italy and competent authorities for the New European Framework for Importing Works of Arts

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    Quick Reads

  • Bank of England Consultation: Proposed Regulatory Regime for Sterling-Denominated Systemic Stablecoins

    Charlotte Hill

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters its Corporate team with the appointment of Ed Morgan

    David Collins

    News

  • In-Depth Virtual Currency Regulation

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands Corporate Tax and Incentives team with the appointment of Vadim Romanoff

    David Collins

    News

Back to top