• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

A tenant-friendly time (for now) - no winding up order for defaulting tenant

min read

We now have further evidence of the court's willingness to act within the spirit of the Corporate Insolvency & Governance Bill ("CIG Bill").  

Although some in the industry have expressed a fundamental concern over the courts relying on the wording of a bill which is not yet even law, this did not stop Mr Justice Morgan from quoting directly from it in the case of Re A Company (Injunction to Restrain Presentation of a Petition) [2020].

Mr Justice Morgan stated that the policy behind the CIG Bill is "self evident" but also referred to a "number of ministerial statements as to the Government's commitment to enact [the] legislation" stating that he felt a "high degree of confidence" that the sections of the CIG Bill relied upon would be enacted more or less in their current form.

The case before Mr Justice Morgan was an application for an injunction to prevent the presentation of a winding up petition for non-payment of rent.  Mr Justice Morgan relied directly on the wording of Schedule 10 of the CIG Bill which provides for a restriction on the presentation of a winding up petition based on an unpaid statutory demand served between 1 March 2020 and 30 June 2020.  The company was able to adduce to the court evidence that coronavirus had had a financial effect on the company (one of the provisions of the CIG Bill) and accordingly granted the injunction was granted.

This is not the first case before the court where tenants have sought to rely on the CIG Bill.  A previous case (discussed here) resulted in a similar outcome.  

It therefore seems that those trying to get a winding up petition into court ahead of the CIG Bill becoming law will be given short shrift by the court and this latest case provides a helpful precedent for tenants - but there remains a query as to whether the court is also setting an unintended precedent of allowing reliance on the provisions of a bill which has not yet even had its second reading and this is surely a risky precedent to set.

...no petition for the winding up of a registered company may be presented under section 124 of the 1986 Act on or after 27 April 2020 on the ground specified in section 123(1)(a) (i.e. non-compliance with a statutory demand) where the demand is served during the relevant period which begins on 1 March 2020 and ends on 30 June 2020 (or one month after the coming into force of schedule 10, whichever is later).

Our thinking

  • Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, as Liquidator of Awal Bank BSC(c) (In Liquidation), welcomes Bahraini Court judgment upholding liquidator’s rejection of US$2.8 billion of claims and confirming debts owing to Awal Bank of US$2.56 billion

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

    min read
  • Top 5 things to consider when selling your Financial Services business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Hong Kong finalises VA advisory and management licensing — what the consultation conclusions mean for Type 4/9 intermediaries and the wider market

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

    min read
  • Paula Boast MBE comments on the UK-GCC free trade agreement in Gulf Daily News

    Paula Boast MBE

    In the Press

    min read
  • Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake features on the Payment Expert podcast, exploring fintech, digital assets and regulatory change

    Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake

    In the Press

    min read
  • What inheriting an interest in a regulated business really means for you

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints First Corporate Tax Partner in Milan

    Michael Lingens

    News

    min read
  • Key factors to understand when investing in a regulated business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Faster Company Formation: Share Capital Can Now Be Paid After Incorporation

    Victor Regnard

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Top 5 things to consider when preparing to sell a Financial Services business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Hong Kong: SFC launches new framework for secondary trading of tokenised investment products

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

    min read
  • Mike Barrington comments on the impact of Standard Life's Aegon acquisition for the insurance market, in Insurance Business, IFA Magazine, Wealth DFM, Professional Adviser, and International Adviser

    Mike Barrington

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Chainwave Capital Management Limited on the launch of the Chainwave Offshore Feeder SPC

    News

    min read
  • IFLR interviews Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson on our role advising the first PISCES share sale

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens its position in the latest Legal 500 EMEA directory, with 22 firm rankings

    News

    min read
  • Greg Stonefield writes for Finextra on the implications of a recent FRC proposal for London’s capital markets

    Greg Stonefield

    In the Press

    min read
  • The Telegraph quotes Charlotte Hill on sale-and-rent-back schemes

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advised Warwick on its approximately $158 million sale to Assured Guaranty Ltd

    Charlie Ring

    News

    min read
  • Luxembourg implements AIFMD II and UCITS VI

    Tobias Niehl

    Insights

    min read
  • Wealth DFM, Portfolio Adviser and Investment Week quote Charlie Ring on Victory Capital's new bid for Janus Henderson

    Charlie Ring

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top