• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Legal disputes during the pandemic and beyond: alternative funding considerations for organisations

The Government is now laying out its phased plan (to be interpreted as you will) to re-open society and therefore the economy. With that, there will be a notable shift in the thought processes of many business owners from how to stay afloat in lockdown, to how to transition effectively into the post-COVID economy. A recession of some sorts is likely to be on its way, but the question on the minds of many will be in what form will that recession take and how long will the economy take to bounce back? 

Regardless, many organisations affected by the pandemic will enter into a period of austerity and cash flow and spending will be scrutinised more than ever before. However, companies will be conscious to keep the wheels of their supply chains turning. Break downs in those supply chains are likely to be unavoidable for some time to come as organisations and the economies in which they operate re-adjust at different rates.

Businesses will still need to protect their legal positions and enforce their rights even when cash is tight. It is likely to be now more than ever that agreements will need to be reviewed with third parties in order to ensure risk and reward is effectively balanced. Some may have been able to take advantage of force majeure provisions to relieve their liability in the event of non-performance, but many will not have been able to and many will still require financial compensation. 

Whilst organisations will be forced to commit to pursuing monies which may be owed, recovery of both monies owed and funds invested in litigation could take some time. So whilst no doubt legal disputes will be on the rise, there is likely to be a change of mindset with respect to funding of these disputes. Alternative funding arrangements (including Damages-based Agreements and Conditional Fee Arrangements) are likely to be more readily considered for the right cases and where there is a benefit for both client and adviser, in exchange for a share in the risk. As always, these types of arrangements must be carefully thought through and each assessed on its own merits to balance the financial pressures of litigation with ensuring businesses can still receive the legal advice they require.

At Charles Russell Speechlys, we understand that flexibility may sometimes be required, which is why we have created a bespoke litigation funding product called “Feesible”. More information can be found here.

Even though countries are now moving towards easing lockdown restrictions, the coronavirus pandemic has already hit the global economy hard.

Our thinking

  • An introduction to the new Procurement Act 2023

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Mind the Gap Trade Mark

    Charlotte Duly

    Insights

  • A Closer Look at the Meaning of ‘Investor’ in Investment Treaty Arbitration

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to unfair prejudice petitions

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

  • New food and drink ads regulation & impact on live sports broadcasts

    Sarah Johnson

    Insights

  • AML in decentralized finance and traditional finance

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • International Arbitration: 2024 in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Has the UAE recognised the principle of Without Prejudice Privilege?

    Maher Al Nashar

    Quick Reads

  • Appointment of company directors – who can do it and how?

    Stephen Burns

    Insights

  • Understanding Contempt of Court in Swiss Law: Key Provisions and Penalties

    Remo Wagner

    Insights

  • Howells v Newport City Council: beware not to lose the private key to your cryptocurrency wallet

    Sonia Kenawy

    Insights

  • Combatting Lookalikes Revisited - clouds lift for brand owners as Thatchers wins its appeal over Aldi copycat cider

    Mary Bagnall

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Mary Bagnall on Aldi’s infringement of Thatchers’ trademark

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • Justice for the Victims of Britain's Largest Ponzi Scheme?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Understanding Civil and Criminal Remedies in France for Financial Crimes

    Frédéric Jeannin

    Insights

  • The Property (Digital Assets etc) Bill: A Wider Category of Assets for the Insolvent Estate?

    Cassidy Fan

    Insights

  • Why Man City took ‘Super “Dry”’ off its Training Kit

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • Abu Dhabi Global Market introduces new employment regulations in the financial free zone

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Promoting certainty in international trade and investment: The 2005 Hague Convention and the enforcement of foreign judgments in the UK and Switzerland

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

  • DIFC Courts reassert their jurisdiction to issue worldwide freezing orders in support of foreign proceedings

    Jinan Jawad

    Quick Reads

Back to top