• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

The BOA holds firm on Rule 40 guidance

The British Olympic Association (BOA) responded yesterday to the letter signed by various Team GB athletes which threatened to pursue legal action in the event that it does not grant further relaxations in respect of its guidance on the IOC's Rule 40. 

The BOA has stressed that "encouraging conversations" with the athletes' representatives are ongoing and that they are "dismayed by the ongoing legal tactics being conducted in the background". 

Therefore, it appears that the BOA has no desire at this stage to deviate from its existing guidance published at the end of October (updated in response to the IOC's relaxation of Rule 40, which in turn followed the IOC's settlement with the German Cartel Office). The BOA's guidance permits an athlete to send one "thank you" post per individual sponsor during the Games Period but does not extend its permissions quite as far as other National Olympic Committees (NOCs), including the US and German NOCs. For a more detailed background, please see here: https://www.charlesrussellspeechlys.com/en/news-and-insights/insights/commercial/2019/thanks-but-no-thanks-british-athletes-take-aim-at-the-british-olympic-association/ 

The BOA's response comes not long after the IOC's open letter to NOCs, which was published on 3 December. This letter essentially reiterated the IOC's stance that - despite an 'invitation' from the European Commission to apply the German Cartel Office approach across the rest of Europe - it will continue to allow individual NOCs to interpret the relaxed Rule 40 wording as it sees fit, mindful that each NOC has its own funding model, local laws and sponsorship contracts. The IOC is preparing additional illustrative guidance regarding Rule 40 and plans to organise a consultation process during 2020 for the affected stakeholders.  

The BOA continues to assert it has a unique funding model - operating without public funding and heavily reliant on revenues from its sponsors (which now include the popular peanut butter brand "Whole Earth" - following Monday's announcement by the BOA). Taking into account this open letter by the IOC and its intended additional measures, the BOA will feel doubly justified in adopting the stance as revealed yesterday. 

However, whether the IOC's position (as outlined in the open letter) is sustainable is a different question. The European Commission's involvement and suggestion that the German Cartel Office approach should be extended across the continent is sure to raise eyebrows among athletes and their sponsors. It puts an added focus on the IOC's intended additional measures - which the BOA will be anticipating as it continues its "encouraging conversations" with Team GB athletes.  

we have been forced to respond fully and robustly to the legal challenge and have done so in the best interests of all of the athletes we serve and the BOA - a not-for-profit independent organisation that receives no taxpayer or Government funds.

Our thinking

  • ICC Arbitration Statistics 2024 – UAE Breaks into Top 5 Seats

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Extra Time: Legal and commercial insights into sponsorship agreements

    Anna Sowerby

    Podcasts

  • Bloomberg quotes Richard Davies on the relationships between football clubs and their investors and shareholders

    Richard Davies

    In the Press

  • Avoiding a sticky wicket

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

  • A sign of the changing tides? The Rise of Women-Led Investment in Sport

    Molly Moseley

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the majority sellers of Portas Consulting on the sale of the company to a division of Creative Artists Agency

    Keir Gordon

    News

  • Triple Play "Bid Fever": UK Tech's ability to scale and go global

    Mark Howard

    Quick Reads

  • City AM quotes Danielle Sharkey on how teams are valued in women's football

    Danielle Sharkey

    In the Press

  • The Court of Arbitration for Sport Appeals Procedure

    Benoît Pasquier

    Insights

  • Martyn’s Law receives Royal Assent – what do property owners and occupiers need to do now?

    Ben Butterworth

    Quick Reads

  • Setting Standards: The Ciarb Guideline on AI Use in Arbitration

    Dalal Alhouti

    Insights

  • Property Wire quotes Ben Butterworth on Martyn's Law receiving Royal Assent

    Ben Butterworth

    In the Press

  • Buyouts Insider quotes Darren Bailey on private equity's increasing interest in sports

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Darren Bailey on the compliance of NBA Europe's format and salary cap with EU law

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

  • PBC Today quotes Mark White on Manchester United's plans to build a new football stadium worth £2 billion

    Mark White

    In the Press

  • Extra Time: The business of women’s football in Africa

    Sarah Johnson

    Podcasts

  • Singaporean Court Declines to Revisit SIAC Registrar’s Administrative Decision

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Passage of the English Arbitration Act 2025 into Law

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • RTHK interviews Patrick Chan on the rise of sports arbitration in Hong Kong

    Patrick Chan

    In the Press

  • 5 trends to watch in International Arbitration in 2025

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

Back to top