• Careers-banner

    Podcasts

Property Patter: the basics of settlement offers

Settlement offers are often a sensible route for trying to settle disputes, not least because they offer flexibility which may be unavailable from a court judgment. Emma Humphreys and Samuel Lear are joined by Caroline Greenwell of our Commercial Dispute Resolution Team to discuss the differences between Calderbank offers and offers made under CPR Part 36 and the basics of how they work in practice. 

You can also find our podcasts on Podbean, Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

 

Action Costs consequences
Part 36 offer for the whole claim, made at least 21 days before trial, is accepted (by claimant or defendant) within the relevant period.

Claimant is entitled to the costs of the proceedings (including their recoverable pre-action costs), to be assessed on the standard basis if not agreed, up to the date of service of notice of acceptance.

Part 36 offer for the whole claim, made at least 21 days before trial, is accepted (by claimant or defendant) after expiry of relevant period.

If the parties cannot agree liability for costs, the court must, unless it considers it unjust, order that the claimant be awarded costs up to the date when relevant period expired and offeree do pay offeror's costs from expiry of relevant period to date of acceptance.

Claimant beats defendant's offer, that is, claimant does not accept defendant's Part 36 offer and obtains a more advantageous judgment.

Costs will be decided in the usual way (see CPR 44.2).

Claimant fails to beat defendant's offer, that is, claimant does not accept defendant's Part 36 offer and fails to obtain a more advantageous judgment.

Unless it considers it unjust to do so, the court must order the claimant to pay defendant's costs (including any recoverable pre-action costs) from date when relevant period expired and interest on those costs.

Claimant equals or beats its own offer, that is, defendant does not accept Part 36 offer and claimant obtains a judgment that is equal to or more advantageous than offer.

Unless it considers it unjust to do so, the court must order the defendant to pay the claimant's costs (including any recoverable pre-action costs) on the indemnity basis from the date the relevant period expired and:

  • Interest on those costs of up to 10% above base rate.
  • Interest on the whole or part of any sum of money (excluding interest) awarded at up to 10% above base rate for some or all of the period starting from the date when the relevant period expired.
  • An additional amount of 10% of the first £500,000 of damages awarded, or 10% of the first £500,000 of costs where there is no monetary award, and 5% of any amount above those figures, subject to the limit of £75,000.
Claimant fails to equal or beat its own offer, that is, defendant rejects Part 36 offer and claimant obtains a less advantageous judgment.

Costs will be decided in the usual way (see CPR 44.2).

Table Credit: Sydney Lee

Our thinking

  • Judgement Under Pressure: The General Counsel and In-House Counsel Role in the Built Environment

    Events

    min read
  • Greenwashing webinar

    Kerry Stares

    Events

    min read
  • HR Breakfast Club: The Employment Rights Act 2025: In Discussion with Matthew Taylor CBE, Chair of the new Fair Work Agency

    Nick Hurley

    Events

    min read
  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 4-6

    Events

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes in Building about the proposed ban on construction retentions

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
  • Kerry Stares is quoted in the ESG edition of Law UK

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Harriet Betteridge comments in Professional Adviser on the six-month countdown to UK pension inheritance tax changes

    Harriet Betteridge

    In the Press

    min read
  • The Global Legal Post quotes Lesley O'Leary on client relationship building in the age of AI

    Lesley O’Leary

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises longstanding client Hearthstone Investments on its acquisition by Sentinel Real Estate

    Edward Robinson

    News

    min read
  • Kurt Rademacher comments in Eprivateclient regarding the possible impact of the US mid-term elections on UHNWIs

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys wins Private Client Law Firm – Ultra-High Net Worth 2026 at eprivateclient Excellence Awards

    Piers Master

    News

    min read
  • The Recognition of UK Grants of Probate in France

    Harriet Betteridge

    Insights

    min read
  • Virtual Currency Regulation: United Arab Emirates

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

    min read
  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • The UK’s Expanded Bereavement Leave Rights

    Emily Chalkley

    Insights

    min read
  • The Silent Majority: Why Britain's Family Businesses Are the Overlooked Engine of AIM and the Main Market

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • My child is engaged – how do I raise the issue of a prenuptial agreement?

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys shortlisted in two categories at Law.com British Legal Awards

    Lesley O’Leary

    News

    min read
  • What could the UK Government's proposed divorce law reforms mean for separating couples?

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes about the Building Safety Levy in Estates Gazette

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top