• Careers-banner

    Podcasts

Property Patter: the basics of settlement offers

Settlement offers are often a sensible route for trying to settle disputes, not least because they offer flexibility which may be unavailable from a court judgment. Emma Humphreys and Samuel Lear are joined by Caroline Greenwell of our Commercial Dispute Resolution Team to discuss the differences between Calderbank offers and offers made under CPR Part 36 and the basics of how they work in practice. 

You can also find our podcasts on PodbeanApple Podcasts and Spotify.

 

Action Costs consequences
Part 36 offer for the whole claim, made at least 21 days before trial, is accepted (by claimant or defendant) within the relevant period.

Claimant is entitled to the costs of the proceedings (including their recoverable pre-action costs), to be assessed on the standard basis if not agreed, up to the date of service of notice of acceptance.

Part 36 offer for the whole claim, made at least 21 days before trial, is accepted (by claimant or defendant) after expiry of relevant period.

If the parties cannot agree liability for costs, the court must, unless it considers it unjust, order that the claimant be awarded costs up to the date when relevant period expired and offeree do pay offeror's costs from expiry of relevant period to date of acceptance.

Claimant beats defendant's offer, that is, claimant does not accept defendant's Part 36 offer and obtains a more advantageous judgment.

Costs will be decided in the usual way (see CPR 44.2).

Claimant fails to beat defendant's offer, that is, claimant does not accept defendant's Part 36 offer and fails to obtain a more advantageous judgment.

Unless it considers it unjust to do so, the court must order the claimant to pay defendant's costs (including any recoverable pre-action costs) from date when relevant period expired and interest on those costs.

Claimant equals or beats its own offer, that is, defendant does not accept Part 36 offer and claimant obtains a judgment that is equal to or more advantageous than offer.

Unless it considers it unjust to do so, the court must order the defendant to pay the claimant's costs (including any recoverable pre-action costs) on the indemnity basis from the date the relevant period expired and:

  • Interest on those costs of up to 10% above base rate.
  • Interest on the whole or part of any sum of money (excluding interest) awarded at up to 10% above base rate for some or all of the period starting from the date when the relevant period expired.
  • An additional amount of 10% of the first £500,000 of damages awarded, or 10% of the first £500,000 of costs where there is no monetary award, and 5% of any amount above those figures, subject to the limit of £75,000.
Claimant fails to equal or beat its own offer, that is, defendant rejects Part 36 offer and claimant obtains a less advantageous judgment.

Costs will be decided in the usual way (see CPR 44.2).

Table Credit: Sydney Lee

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • The UAE's New Civil Code: Implications for Construction Contracts

    Maher Al Nashar

    Events

    min read
  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys awarded “Legal Advisers of the Year” at the HealthInvestor Awards 2026

    David Coates

    News

    min read
  • 5 things English companies and their investors need to know about human rights-related litigation risks

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Are you ready for the EU Forced Labour Regulation?

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • The Increased Expedited Procedure Threshold under the 2026 ICC Rules: What Does It Mean for Mid-Value Construction Disputes in the UAE?

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
  • A founder's guide to SAFEs: fast-tracking investment for UK technology start-ups

    Grace Hudson

    Insights

    min read
  • Practicalities of Property Management Seminar

    Events

    min read
  • Darren Bailey sits on the judging panel for City AM's Football Power List

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill: Where are we now?

    Lauren Fraser

    Insights

    min read
  • “A Fairer End to Relationships”: First Thoughts on the Government's Landmark Consultation

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • Case No. 9. Can an arbitration clause be extended to a non-signatory party, and what are the relevant factors?

    Annapaola Negri-Clementi

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Hutton contributes to Investors' Chronicle exploring the role of trusts in families' financial planning

    Charles Hutton

    In the Press

    min read
  • Robert Lundie Smith writes for WIPR on how enforced arbitration could fix a 'dysfunctional' global FRAND system

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Summer Transfer Window 2026: What Latin American footballers need to know about UK tax before signing with a Premier League Club

    Rafael Boccatto

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, as Liquidator of Awal Bank BSC(c) (In Liquidation), welcomes Bahraini Court judgment upholding liquidator’s rejection of US$2.8 billion of claims and confirming debts owing to Awal Bank of US$2.56 billion

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • “Watt’s mine is yours” - environmental data sharing considerations for office occupiers

    Pippa Clifford

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top