• news-banner

    Expert Insights

The Tech Entrepreneur’s Journey – Venture Capital

Following on from the first article of the series, The Tech Entrepreneur’s Journey – The Capital Requirements, this article will consider key aspects that a tech entrepreneur should be conscious of prior to taking on Venture Capital.

What is Venture Capital?

Venture capital (VC) is a form of investment for early-stage, innovative businesses with strong growth potential. Whilst not always the case, VC houses typically invest in technology companies with an exciting concept or piece of technology. The optimum investment outcome being that the investment company is revolutionary or becomes what is known as a “disruptor” leading to a greater return on the house’s investment.

To be a “disruptor” is to create a product, service, or way of doing things that initially displaces and then eventually replaces the existing market leaders. Disruptors are generally entrepreneurs rather than industry insiders or market specialists.

Investment Structure

VC investments are traditionally made in return for a minority shareholding in a company, due to the perceived higher risk associated with investing into early-stage businesses. Unlike a private equity investment, VC houses are willing to invest in businesses not yet making a profit and typically hold their investments for a period of between five and seven years before seeking an exit.

Subject to the risk profile of the (investee) company that is seeking VC and its target investment amount, it is not uncommon for multiple VC houses to invest alongside each other with each VC house taking its own minority stake.

As we noted in our first article in this series, although the Founder(s) should expect to provide VC houses with a number of investment protections they should still expect to retain ultimate control of the company (including the board) and, subject to investor veto rights, the day to day operations of the business. However, ‘Series A Investment’ documents (those being used for the first VC investment made into a company) will normally impose more stringent restrictions on the management of the company and the business when compared to previous capital raises from family and friends and seed investment.

Any VC investment will be structured in a manner that is as tax efficient as possible for the VC house. As the tech entrepreneur/Founder you should obtain your own tax advice to make sure that taking on the VC investment in the proposed structure is in the best interests of both the company and you as a principal shareholder of the company.

Management Team

Prior to taking on VC, the Founder(s) will need to have a well thought out, realistic and achievable business plan which the management team will aim to deliver. A key element underpinning the business plan will be the financial modelling, which the Founder(s) will need to be able to justify and stand behind. An astute investor tends to make its investment based in no small part on its assessment of the management team and their ability to execute the business plan.

Conclusion

The VC house’s reward for investing in a ‘disruptor’ business can easily be lost by one or a number of poor investments so, before investing, VC houses will heavily scrutinise the potential risks of the proposed investment and assessing what the key ingredients to success are for the company, including the management team. VC houses want to know whether management is up to the task, the size of the market opportunity and whether the concept or piece of technology which is the focus of the investment has what it takes to guarantee a return on its investment. Ultimately, due to the early-stage nature of the business a VC house will seek to reduce the risks associated with its investment in as many was as possible.

Finally, we again set out below an overview of a typical business corporate life cycle. Having now addressed the first four stages (being (1) Incorporation, (2) Founder(s) friends and family funding, (3) Seed Investment and (4) Venture Capital) the next article in this series will address Private Equity Funding with the final article of the series addressing the various options open to shareholders to realise value for their business upon an Exit.

Funding cycles

Our thinking

  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Corporate restructuring: Preparing for Future Challenges

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

  • Choosing the Right PISCES Platform for Private Company Liquidity

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

  • How to construe contentious trusts - lessons from recent cases

    Sarah Moore

    Insights

  • Q&A: Modifying Restrictive Covenants

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

  • RICS Property Journal features Chandni Pandya and Georgina Muskett on service charges for live/work units

    Chandni Pandya

    In the Press

  • Grid Connections, Environmental Assessment and the DCO Process – What is the effect of the Raeshaw Farms judgement?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

  • Construction News and Facilities Management Now quote William Turner, Elizabeth Hughes, and Alexander Hemmings on new Construction Industry Scheme rules for supply chain fraud

    Elizabeth Hughes

    In the Press

  • Eddie Richards and Sadie Pitman write for Logistics Business on the UK's readiness for an electric vehicle revolution

    Sadie Pitman

    In the Press

  • Chiara Muston comments in People Management on 'empty time' and the gig economy

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

  • Q&A: Boundary Issues

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • Remedy and Leverage: Addressing Human Rights Risks in Corporate Supply Chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2026

    Bart Peerless

    News

  • How is the UK Construction Industry Impacted by Modern Slavery?

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • Martyn’s Law: What Historic Houses Need to Know

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • Application for modification of restrictive covenant fails on “worst case” scenario

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

  • IFLR interviews Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson on our role advising the first PISCES share sale

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    In the Press

  • Social risks in the supply chain – from due diligence to resilience: Corporate human rights due diligence – a snapshot of the law in EU/UK

    Kerry Stares

    Podcasts

  • Time to Pay Up: The Government Responds to the Late Payments Consultation

    Willemijn Paul

    Quick Reads

Back to top