• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Amenity Space in UK Office Buildings: Why It Matters and What Tenants Need to Consider

min read

The consensus is that amenity space has shifted from optional to fundamental in UK offices. For landlords, a compelling amenity offer is thought to increase desirability, reduce voids and support headline rents. For tenants, amenities are designed to attract and retain talent, and to encourage productivity and culture through a focus on wellbeing. The overall objective is to bring people back to the office based on value rather than mandate, making the office a desirable destination rather than an obligation.

Consideration of amenity spans both in‑building and local neighbourhood features. Internally, quality end‑of‑journey facilities (secure bike stores, lockers, showers, etc., as a minimum), wellbeing rooms, flexible collaboration zones, auditoria, event space, outdoor terraces and hospitality‑grade receptions are expected to sit alongside access to transport, green space, fitness, childcare, culture, retail and food ecosystems. Occupiers now consider amenity density and local characteristics alongside headline rent and service charge, and these can be as decisive as the need for green credentials, EPC ratings and floorplate efficiency.

AI is further shaping what amenities are offered and how they are delivered. Predictive models support dynamic space allocation; computer vision and data from devices such as occupancy counters, air‑quality monitors and energy meters inform building management and optimise energy performance and indoor environmental quality; recommendation engines personalise amenity use and virtual concierge services handle bookings and queries.

Costs and service charge

The cost is one of the most important considerations for a tenant taking space with extensive amenities. It is likely that the costs of providing various services will be recovered from the tenants of the building on a proportionate basis, and a well‑advised tenant should ensure they are clear on what these costs are on an annual basis and whether they represent appropriate value.

Where the cost of an amenity is agreed to be passed through, a tenant should confirm whether amenities are common parts covered by the service charge or additional services with separate licence fees. This is particularly relevant to shared spaces such as auditoria and flexible working spaces, where a certain number of credits may be included in the principal rent (with extra credits available at a cost), but with the general maintenance and servicing of such spaces flowing through the service charge.

The services included in the service charge schedule should be considered in detail and limited as necessary. It may also be advantageous to agree a cap on the annual service charge.

Access rights

Access to the various amenities on offer should be established at the outset and, if possible, set out in the lease rather than a building handbook (which can be changed by the Landlord from time to time).

The specifics of access should be agreed. For example, with amenities such as bike stores and lockers, are these to be available on a first‑come, first‑served basis or is the tenant expecting a specific allocation? Traditionally, a specific allocation has seemed the fairest approach, but AI monitoring tools mean some Landlords prefer to designate space based on use (i.e., allocating a higher proportion of bike spaces to a tenant occupying a smaller floor area who is shown to use them more frequently, thereby avoiding unused amenity space).

Limitations on use

Linked to access rights, it is important for tenants to establish how access will work in practice. Will it be 24/7, or is it limited to specific hours (and if so, are these reflective of the tenant’s core hours)?

Tenants should ensure that services’ opening hours and event policies are aligned with their operational needs. For example, if event space is a key requirement, tenants should consider noise, licensing, planning constraints and conditions, as well as any restrictions placed on the space by the Landlord (i.e., the sale or provision of alcohol, number of guests and frequency of use).

Availability and changes

Landlords often reserve rights to alter or withdraw amenities; as such, a tenant should seek safeguards around material reductions, consultation and reasonable endeavours to provide alternatives. It is also preferable for the lease to document exclusive use rights, priority rules and access to booking systems.

Where amenities are business‑critical, the tenant should negotiate availability commitments, service levels and remedies for persistent unavailability at the outset, otherwise there is a risk of paying for features that are poorly maintained, unavailable at peak times or misaligned with operational needs.

Operational risk

Operational risk sits alongside cost. Tenants should seek to establish and set out health and safety responsibilities for gyms, terraces and event spaces, including supervision, equipment inspection and incident reporting. For technology‑enabled amenities, the parties should consider data protection, including controller/processor roles, lawful bases for employee data, retention and cyber security standards. Where building systems integrate with tenant tools, the parties should include appropriate data‑sharing and security schedules, audit rights and incident notification obligations.

Tenant premises

Tenants should consider whether there are any restrictions on tenant works as a result of the amenities offered (i.e., HVAC or building management systems) and whether the lease needs to provide specifically for any tenant works that might integrate or interface with landlord systems, with clear maintenance, reinstatement and yield up obligations.

In summary, amenities can be a genuine differentiator, but their value is enhanced when commercial promise is underpinned by clear drafting and robust governance. Defining scope, cost, use, availability and limitations at heads of terms and in the lease will help to ensure transparency and certainty, and that the amenity offer meaningfully supports the tenant’s employees and operational goals.

Our thinking

  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • Practicalities of Property Management Seminar

    Events

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • Court Determined Global Licence Determinations (Interim and Final): Cross Border Complexities

    Robert Lundie Smith

    Events

    min read
  • Steering the Ship: Navigating the Seas of Trust Applications without Capsizing into Hostile Litigation

    Robert Avis

    Events

    min read
  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • Jonathan Burt comments in The Telegraph on HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Miranda Fisher and Hannah Owen write in the Daily Mail's This is Money section on whether you can divorce your parents

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

    min read
  • Keir Gordon and Molly Moseley write in City AM about how high-net-worth individuals can rival private equity in sport

    Keir Gordon

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys shortlisted in two categories for Legal Business Awards 2026

    Lesley O’Leary

    News

    min read
  • The CMA’s new supply chain guidance on greenwashing claims: what it means for brands, manufacturers, retailers and platforms

    Hemani Sandal

    Insights

    min read
  • Are you ready for the EU Forced Labour Regulation?

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Dangote Cement and the Emerging Shape of London’s Equity Markets

    Greg Stonefield

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Key factors to understand when investing in a regulated business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Arise Capital Partners on its acquisition of Sheffield Wednesday Football Club

    Keir Gordon

    News

    min read
  • Emoji on trial: Can a thumbs-up waive a rent increase?

    Harriet Durn

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Supply Chain Resilience: From "Just in Time" to "Just in Case"

    Mark Dewar

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write for FT Adviser on how the Serious Fraud Office's latest business plan measures up against its five-year strategy

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top