• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Rent recovery and tenant insolvency - Estates Gazette Q&A

Harriet Durn and Kate Traynor look at statutory demands and conditions which must be complied with before rent arrears can be recovered.

Question

I am the landlord of residential premises previously let to an individual in central London. The rent exceeds £100,000 per year. The tenant vacated after a year and is in rent arrears of almost £60,000. I have been unsuccessful in recovering the arrears to date despite sending significant correspondence to the tenant. I recently served a statutory demand on the tenant and have also presented a bankruptcy petition. The tenant is disputing the debt on the grounds that I have not complied with section 48 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. The property is owned by me through a company registered in Jersey. Is the tenant right, and will I be successful in obtaining a bankruptcy order against the tenant?

Answer

Unfortunately, the tenant is likely to have successful grounds to defend the bankruptcy petition if you have not served a section 48 notice under the 1987 Act. This is because, technically speaking, the rent does not fall due until section 48 is complied with, and late service of notice could not retrospectively cure the defect once a bankruptcy petition is presented. The High Court, in the recent case of Sunset Ltd and another v Al-Hindi [2023] EWHC 2443 (Ch); [2023] PLSCS 167, confirmed, first, that failure to serve a section 48 notice meant the debt cannot be treated as due at the time the petition was presented, and second, that the late service of a section 48 notice providing an address for service in England and Wales will not cure a procedural defect retrospectively.

Explanation

Section 48(1) of the 1987 Act requires a landlord in respect of a residential dwelling to “…furnish the tenant with an address in England and Wales at which notices (including notices in proceedings) may be served on him by the tenant”. Therefore, failure to stipulate an address for service of notices, etc in a tenancy agreement or separate correspondence sent to the tenant equates to non-compliance with section 48 of the Act.

As a result of non-compliance with section 48 of the Act, pursuant to section 48(2), any rent outstanding from the tenant to the landlord will not fall due.

Unfortunately, in Sunset, the court confirmed that the debt cannot be treated as due at the time the bankruptcy petition was presented if section 48(1) has not been complied with. Section 267 of the Insolvency Act 1986 is authority for the fact that “…each of the petitioning creditors must be a person to whom the debt or (as the case may be) at least one of the debts is owed” and it, therefore, follows that the late service of a section 48 notice will not cure such defect. This highlights the importance of ensuring that a debt actually exists at the time of presenting a bankruptcy petition.

Unless section 48 of the 1987 Act has been complied with prior to the presentation of the petition, it is likely that you will need to withdraw your bankruptcy petition, notify the tenant of an address in England and Wales for the service of notices and proceedings pursuant to section 48 of the Act, and then serve a fresh statutory demand. 

While most tenancies will contain details of an address for service of the landlord in England and Wales, it is becoming increasingly common for landlords to state an address outside of England and Wales (for example, the address of a foreign holding company in Jersey) as their address for service. You will need to check your tenancy agreement to confirm whether the address for service given for your company was in Jersey or in England and Wales. 

If an address for service of notices and proceedings was given in England and Wales, you are likely to have complied with section 48 of the Act. If the tenancy agreement contains your company’s address in Jersey, you are required to supply an alternative address in England and Wales to avoid falling foul of section 48 of the Act. 

If you have not complied with section 48 of the Act, then, as you have already served a statutory demand and bankruptcy petition, you will need to withdraw the bankruptcy petition and then give notice under section 48 of the Act to the tenant with your address for service in England and Wales. You will then need to serve a fresh statutory demand before proceeding with further bankruptcy proceedings.

Landlords will not be prevented from recovering debt as a result of failure to comply with section 48 of the Act for all time – they will just need to ensure that either:

  1. the tenancy is clear in providing an address for service that is within England and Wales; or
  2. a section 48 notice is served prior to the service of any statutory demand in relation to the debt arising out of residential premises.

Harriet Durn is an Associate at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, and Kate Traynor is a barrister at Landmark Chambers.

This article was first published in Estates Gazette on 8 May 2024.

Our thinking

  • Key Developments in International Arbitration for 2026

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Agricultural policy review 2025: Key changes and what to expect in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024: Government launches consultation to switch on provisions relating to estate management charges

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

  • M&A in UK financial services - will mega-deals in 2025 lead to more mid-market activity in 2026?

    Mike Barrington

    Quick Reads

  • A new prospectus regime and other developments impacting UK Equity Capital Markets in 2026

    Andrew Collins

    Insights

  • The Introduction of Aquis Support Services – 19 January 2026

    Emily Dobson

    Insights

  • POATR - What type of securities does the new regime apply to?

    Emily Dobson

    Quick Reads

  • Infosecurity Magazine quotes Mark Bailey on the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill

    Mark Bailey

    In the Press

  • Hannah Catt writes for Tax Adviser on the implications of the newly introduced high value council tax surcharge in the UK

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Dominic Lawrance on rumours surrounding potential UK government plans to attract HNW investors

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • UK Living Sector 2026: Regulatory pressures, new trading platforms and more accessible public markets

    Sarah Wigington

    Insights

  • A Family Lawyer’s guide to five of the top most Googled Family Law questions in England and Wales relating to children

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Drip Pricing and Enforcement: How the DMCC Act is Changing the Rules

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • The Standard quotes William Marriott on the impact of the newly introduced 'mansion tax' in the UK

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • Amenity Space in UK Office Buildings: Why It Matters and What Tenants Need to Consider

    Lynsey Inglis

    Insights

  • UK Hotels Sector 2026: Renovations, AI and Experience‑Led Stays

    James Broadhurst

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows Real Estate team with the appointment of UK and Italian market expert Chiara Del Frate

    Robin Grove MIoL

    News

  • Investment Week quotes Greg Stonefield on whether 2026 will be the year of London IPOs

    Greg Stonefield

    In the Press

  • Compliance Week quotes Abigail Rushton on the UK’s anti-corruption strategy and compliance lessons for companies and advisors

    Abigail Rushton

    In the Press

  • When Saying “No” to Mediation Is Reasonable: Guidance from Grijns v Grijns

    Bella Preece

    Quick Reads

Back to top