• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Rent recovery and tenant insolvency - Estates Gazette Q&A

min read

Harriet Durn and Kate Traynor look at statutory demands and conditions which must be complied with before rent arrears can be recovered.

Question

I am the landlord of residential premises previously let to an individual in central London. The rent exceeds £100,000 per year. The tenant vacated after a year and is in rent arrears of almost £60,000. I have been unsuccessful in recovering the arrears to date despite sending significant correspondence to the tenant. I recently served a statutory demand on the tenant and have also presented a bankruptcy petition. The tenant is disputing the debt on the grounds that I have not complied with section 48 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. The property is owned by me through a company registered in Jersey. Is the tenant right, and will I be successful in obtaining a bankruptcy order against the tenant?

Answer

Unfortunately, the tenant is likely to have successful grounds to defend the bankruptcy petition if you have not served a section 48 notice under the 1987 Act. This is because, technically speaking, the rent does not fall due until section 48 is complied with, and late service of notice could not retrospectively cure the defect once a bankruptcy petition is presented. The High Court, in the recent case of Sunset Ltd and another v Al-Hindi [2023] EWHC 2443 (Ch); [2023] PLSCS 167, confirmed, first, that failure to serve a section 48 notice meant the debt cannot be treated as due at the time the petition was presented, and second, that the late service of a section 48 notice providing an address for service in England and Wales will not cure a procedural defect retrospectively.

Explanation

Section 48(1) of the 1987 Act requires a landlord in respect of a residential dwelling to “…furnish the tenant with an address in England and Wales at which notices (including notices in proceedings) may be served on him by the tenant”. Therefore, failure to stipulate an address for service of notices, etc in a tenancy agreement or separate correspondence sent to the tenant equates to non-compliance with section 48 of the Act.

As a result of non-compliance with section 48 of the Act, pursuant to section 48(2), any rent outstanding from the tenant to the landlord will not fall due.

Unfortunately, in Sunset, the court confirmed that the debt cannot be treated as due at the time the bankruptcy petition was presented if section 48(1) has not been complied with. Section 267 of the Insolvency Act 1986 is authority for the fact that “…each of the petitioning creditors must be a person to whom the debt or (as the case may be) at least one of the debts is owed” and it, therefore, follows that the late service of a section 48 notice will not cure such defect. This highlights the importance of ensuring that a debt actually exists at the time of presenting a bankruptcy petition.

Unless section 48 of the 1987 Act has been complied with prior to the presentation of the petition, it is likely that you will need to withdraw your bankruptcy petition, notify the tenant of an address in England and Wales for the service of notices and proceedings pursuant to section 48 of the Act, and then serve a fresh statutory demand. 

While most tenancies will contain details of an address for service of the landlord in England and Wales, it is becoming increasingly common for landlords to state an address outside of England and Wales (for example, the address of a foreign holding company in Jersey) as their address for service. You will need to check your tenancy agreement to confirm whether the address for service given for your company was in Jersey or in England and Wales. 

If an address for service of notices and proceedings was given in England and Wales, you are likely to have complied with section 48 of the Act. If the tenancy agreement contains your company’s address in Jersey, you are required to supply an alternative address in England and Wales to avoid falling foul of section 48 of the Act. 

If you have not complied with section 48 of the Act, then, as you have already served a statutory demand and bankruptcy petition, you will need to withdraw the bankruptcy petition and then give notice under section 48 of the Act to the tenant with your address for service in England and Wales. You will then need to serve a fresh statutory demand before proceeding with further bankruptcy proceedings.

Landlords will not be prevented from recovering debt as a result of failure to comply with section 48 of the Act for all time – they will just need to ensure that either:

  1. the tenancy is clear in providing an address for service that is within England and Wales; or
  2. a section 48 notice is served prior to the service of any statutory demand in relation to the debt arising out of residential premises.

Harriet Durn is an Associate at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, and Kate Traynor is a barrister at Landmark Chambers.

This article was first published in Estates Gazette on 8 May 2024.

Our thinking

  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • Practicalities of Property Management Seminar

    Events

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • Court Determined Global Licence Determinations (Interim and Final): Cross Border Complexities

    Robert Lundie Smith

    Events

    min read
  • Steering the Ship: Navigating the Seas of Trust Applications without Capsizing into Hostile Litigation

    Robert Avis

    Events

    min read
  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • Jonathan Burt comments in The Telegraph on HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Miranda Fisher and Hannah Owen write in the Daily Mail's This is Money section on whether you can divorce your parents

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

    min read
  • Keir Gordon and Molly Moseley write in City AM about how high-net-worth individuals can rival private equity in sport

    Keir Gordon

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys shortlisted in two categories for Legal Business Awards 2026

    Lesley O’Leary

    News

    min read
  • The CMA’s new supply chain guidance on greenwashing claims: what it means for brands, manufacturers, retailers and platforms

    Hemani Sandal

    Insights

    min read
  • Are you ready for the EU Forced Labour Regulation?

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Dangote Cement and the Emerging Shape of London’s Equity Markets

    Greg Stonefield

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Key factors to understand when investing in a regulated business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Arise Capital Partners on its acquisition of Sheffield Wednesday Football Club

    Keir Gordon

    News

    min read
  • Emoji on trial: Can a thumbs-up waive a rent increase?

    Harriet Durn

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Supply Chain Resilience: From "Just in Time" to "Just in Case"

    Mark Dewar

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write for FT Adviser on how the Serious Fraud Office's latest business plan measures up against its five-year strategy

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top