• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Rent recovery and tenant insolvency - Estates Gazette Q&A

Harriet Durn and Kate Traynor look at statutory demands and conditions which must be complied with before rent arrears can be recovered.

Question

I am the landlord of residential premises previously let to an individual in central London. The rent exceeds £100,000 per year. The tenant vacated after a year and is in rent arrears of almost £60,000. I have been unsuccessful in recovering the arrears to date despite sending significant correspondence to the tenant. I recently served a statutory demand on the tenant and have also presented a bankruptcy petition. The tenant is disputing the debt on the grounds that I have not complied with section 48 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. The property is owned by me through a company registered in Jersey. Is the tenant right, and will I be successful in obtaining a bankruptcy order against the tenant?

Answer

Unfortunately, the tenant is likely to have successful grounds to defend the bankruptcy petition if you have not served a section 48 notice under the 1987 Act. This is because, technically speaking, the rent does not fall due until section 48 is complied with, and late service of notice could not retrospectively cure the defect once a bankruptcy petition is presented. The High Court, in the recent case of Sunset Ltd and another v Al-Hindi [2023] EWHC 2443 (Ch); [2023] PLSCS 167, confirmed, first, that failure to serve a section 48 notice meant the debt cannot be treated as due at the time the petition was presented, and second, that the late service of a section 48 notice providing an address for service in England and Wales will not cure a procedural defect retrospectively.

Explanation

Section 48(1) of the 1987 Act requires a landlord in respect of a residential dwelling to “…furnish the tenant with an address in England and Wales at which notices (including notices in proceedings) may be served on him by the tenant”. Therefore, failure to stipulate an address for service of notices, etc in a tenancy agreement or separate correspondence sent to the tenant equates to non-compliance with section 48 of the Act.

As a result of non-compliance with section 48 of the Act, pursuant to section 48(2), any rent outstanding from the tenant to the landlord will not fall due.

Unfortunately, in Sunset, the court confirmed that the debt cannot be treated as due at the time the bankruptcy petition was presented if section 48(1) has not been complied with. Section 267 of the Insolvency Act 1986 is authority for the fact that “…each of the petitioning creditors must be a person to whom the debt or (as the case may be) at least one of the debts is owed” and it, therefore, follows that the late service of a section 48 notice will not cure such defect. This highlights the importance of ensuring that a debt actually exists at the time of presenting a bankruptcy petition.

Unless section 48 of the 1987 Act has been complied with prior to the presentation of the petition, it is likely that you will need to withdraw your bankruptcy petition, notify the tenant of an address in England and Wales for the service of notices and proceedings pursuant to section 48 of the Act, and then serve a fresh statutory demand. 

While most tenancies will contain details of an address for service of the landlord in England and Wales, it is becoming increasingly common for landlords to state an address outside of England and Wales (for example, the address of a foreign holding company in Jersey) as their address for service. You will need to check your tenancy agreement to confirm whether the address for service given for your company was in Jersey or in England and Wales. 

If an address for service of notices and proceedings was given in England and Wales, you are likely to have complied with section 48 of the Act. If the tenancy agreement contains your company’s address in Jersey, you are required to supply an alternative address in England and Wales to avoid falling foul of section 48 of the Act. 

If you have not complied with section 48 of the Act, then, as you have already served a statutory demand and bankruptcy petition, you will need to withdraw the bankruptcy petition and then give notice under section 48 of the Act to the tenant with your address for service in England and Wales. You will then need to serve a fresh statutory demand before proceeding with further bankruptcy proceedings.

Landlords will not be prevented from recovering debt as a result of failure to comply with section 48 of the Act for all time – they will just need to ensure that either:

  1. the tenancy is clear in providing an address for service that is within England and Wales; or
  2. a section 48 notice is served prior to the service of any statutory demand in relation to the debt arising out of residential premises.

Harriet Durn is an Associate at Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, and Kate Traynor is a barrister at Landmark Chambers.

This article was first published in Estates Gazette on 8 May 2024.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2025

    Simon Ridpath

    Events

  • London International Disputes Week: Trusts hurt: the fraud lawyer, the trust, and the avenues of attack (and defence)

    Tamasin Perkins

    Events

  • London International Disputes Week: Navigating International M&A Disputes: Insights and Strategies for 2025

    Stephen Burns

    Events

  • Government publishes consultation on Regulations about how rent is calculated under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 for agreements with Code operators

    Georgina Muskett

    Quick Reads

  • ESG Duties for Directors: Legal Obligations and Risks Under English Company Law

    Katie Bewick

    Insights

  • Conclusive truth or abusive sleuth - can covert recordings be used in family law proceedings?

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Insights

  • Successors in title bound by predecessors’ boundary demarcation agreement, notwithstanding lack of knowledge

    Emma Preece

    Quick Reads

  • UK Real Estate Opportunities for Asia Capital

    Simon Green

    Events

  • Law Commission publish their recommendations for reform on Wills

    Charis Thornton

    Quick Reads

  • What does the UK Immigration White Paper mean for businesses, families and entrepreneurs?

    Paul McCarthy

    Insights

  • BBC News quotes Emma Preece on a Supreme Court decision around whether people can camp in certain areas of Dartmoor without permission from landowners

    Emma Preece

    In the Press

  • The UK’s immigration white paper – what does it mean for British Nationals (Overseas)?

    Owen Chan

    Quick Reads

  • Directors’ Disqualification Under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986: What UK Directors Need to Know

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Catrin Harrison on IHT Budget changes and the impact on wealthy UK expats

    Catrin Harrison

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: Applications to discharge or modify restrictions

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Should access be given between exchange and completion?

    Twiggy Ho

    Insights

  • What next for the hydrogen sector?

    Rachael Davidson

    Quick Reads

  • UK Cybersecurity and Resilience Policy Statement April 2025 - Impacts for Managed Services Providers and Data Centres

    Mark Bailey

    Insights

  • Covenant modified by Tribunal to allow office redevelopment in accordance with planning permission

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

  • Thomas Snider and Adrian Mayer write for African Law & Business on rising levels of private investment between the UAE and Africa

    Adrian Mayer

    In the Press

Back to top