• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 - further amendments to the BSA 2022

min read

While other parts of the legislation have received more attention, the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 (“LAFRA 2024”) has made some important amendments to Part 5 of the Building Safety Act 2022 (“BSA 2002”).

Some of LAFRA 2024’s changes to the BSA 2022 came in force in July 2024, some have only just been commenced.  For the changes brought into force in July, please see our insight: The Leasehold and Freehold and Reform Bill gains Royal Assent.

The first commencement order has now been published: The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 (Commencement No.1) Regulations 2024 (“Commencement Order 1”), which provides that sections, 114, 115 and 116 of LAFRA 2024 come into force on 31 October 2024.

A brief overview of the some of the most pertinent changes introduced by these sections is as follows.

Section 114 of LARFA 2024 adds a new definition to the BSA 2022, that of a ‘relevant step’.

A ‘relevant step’ is defined as “steps which have as their purpose

  • preventing or reducing the likelihood of a fire or collapse of the building (or any part of it) occurring as a result of the relevant defect,
  • reducing the severity of any such incident, or
  • preventing or reducing harm to people in or about the building that could result from such an incident.”

This definition is introduced into Schedule 8 of the BSA 2022 to ensure the costs of carrying out ‘Relevant Steps’ cannot be charged to ‘Qualifying Leaseholders’ and is also now added to Section 120 BSA 2022 in connection with its application to Remediation Orders and Remediation Contribution Orders.

Section 115 of LARFA 2024 also incorporates the ‘relevant step’ definition into Section 123 BSA 2022. This is a potentially significant change to Remediation Orders. The change allows the Tribunal to order that the Landlord takes relevant steps instead of remedying the defect itself. This will presumably cover a situation where appropriate mitigations can adequately cover the risk, and it would be disproportionate to insist on remedying the same in full as a result. As such freeholders may welcome its introduction, though it remains to be seen how the Tribunal uses it in practice.

This change gives the Tribunal more flexibility when it comes to the Orders it can make, and also is a continuation of the shift to a more risk orientated approach, such as that taken by PAS9980, the current code of practice for assessing the risk from fire to already built blocks of flats, from cladding and external wall systems.

The costs of ‘relevant steps’ can also be recovered under Remediation Contribution Orders pursuant to amendments introduced by Section 116 LAFRA 2024. This section also expands the costs which can be claimed by making clear that costs such as obtaining expert reports and temporary accommodation costs can form part of such a claim. The Secretary of State is also given a power to widen the scope of costs which can be recovered at a later date by making regulations.

Section 116 LAFRA also ensures that Remediation Contribution Orders can be used to cover additional prospective costs beyond those of remedying ‘relevant defects’, in that the Tribunal has now the ability pursuant to the nearly inserted Section 124(aa) BSA 2022 to “determine that a specified body corporate or partnership is liable for the reasonable costs of specified things done or to be done”.

These changes provide the Tribunal with more discretion and flexibility with the orders it can make but will be of concern to those defending such claims, given the new categories of costs which can now potentially be claimed.

For the avoidance of doubt, Commencement Order 1 does not bring in any provisions of LAFRA 2024 dealing with enfranchisement, regulation of service charges and estate management charges or banning leasehold houses.  It is concerned only with amendments to the BSA 2022.

We are tracking developments on our Essential Residential Hub.  Please do not hesitate to contact Oliver Park, or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact if you have any queries. 

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Caveat Venditor?: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Sale and Purchase Agreements

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Easy come, easy go? A new consideration for temporary non-residents

    Christopher Gothard

    Insights

    min read
  • Restraint and Confiscation Orders in England and Wales

    Jana Billington

    Insights

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes in Building magazine about the process of remediation for residential buildings with unsafe cladding

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Owen and Lydia Kember write in Family Law Journal on the intersection of trust law and surrogacy

    Hannah Owen

    In the Press

    min read
  • Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake and Mike Barrington write in Finextra about regulatory themes every FCA-authorised fintech leader should be watching

    Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake

    In the Press

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Darren Bailey writes in City AM about what European football could learn from the US sports law landscape

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys recognised in Spear’s Legal Indices 2026

    News

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath features in the latest episode of the Non-Billable podcast

    Simon Ridpath

    In the Press

    min read
  • Private equity (PE): How Founders and Management Teams can protect themselves - it’s a marriage of convenience so make sure your pre-nup is watertight…

    Nadim Meer

    Insights

    min read
  • From Pilot to Nationwide Protection: New Powers to Protect Victims of Domestic Abuse

    Hilde Braaten Resseth

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

Back to top