• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022: Q&A about protected rent

Under the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Bill, if the protected rent period runs to 18 July 2021, and a service charge demand or rent demand is issued for the June quarter (24 June 2021 to 28 September 2021) in June 2021, will the whole demand be protected or just an apportioned part from 24 June 2021 to 18 July 2021?

References: Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Bill (HL Bill 92) (parliament.uk)

The Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Bill was introduced to Parliament on 9 November 2021 and is currently progressing through the House of Lords. It is anticipated to become law on or before 25 March 2022. The second reading of the Bill in the House of Lords is scheduled to take place on 27 January 2022. Further amendments could be made to the Bill before it becomes law.

The Bill provides that any rent and service charge arrears which have accrued due in respect of a business tenancy during periods of enforced closure are protected under the Bill and subject to a binding arbitration scheme. There are restrictions imposed on a landlord in respect of the action which can be taken to recover arrears which fall within the scope of the Bill.

Section 2 states that the Bill will apply to both rent and service charge payable under a business tenancy. A 'protected rent debt' is defined in section 3 as a debt under a business tenancy consisting of unpaid protected rent.

Section 5 defines the ‘protected period’ as beginning with 21 March 2020 and ending on the last day when the premises was subject to a forced closure requirement (provided that that date was before 18 July 2021) or in any other case, 18 July 2021. Therefore, the latest date under the Bill for expiration of the protected period in respect of any business tenancy is 18 July 2021.

Section 3(2) states that rent will only fall into the category of protected rent if two conditions are satisfied:

  1. The tenancy was adversely affected by coronavirus, and
  2. The rent is attributable to a period of occupation by the tenant during the protected period.

Section 4 contains the definition of 'adversely affected by coronavirus'. In broad terms, a tenancy was adversely affected by coronavirus if it was subject to forced closure under coronavirus legislation.

Section 3(5) deals with apportionment of arrears. It states: ‘…if any rent due under the tenancy is attributable to a period of occupation by the tenant of which only part is of the description in subsection 2(b), then so much of the rent as can be reasonably attributed to that part of the period is protected rent.’ This means that where rent or other sums protected under the Bill fall due on a date within the protected period but cover a period beyond 18 July 2021, those sums are to be apportioned so that only the rent for a protected period is classed as protected rent under the Bill.

Applying this provision to the question, only the apportioned part of the demand from 24 June 2021 to 18 July 2021 is protected rent under the Bill. The rent for the period 18 July 2021 to 28 September 2021 is not protected rent and therefore falls outside of the scope of the binding arbitration scheme under the Bill.

For further guidance, see:

Practice Note: Coronavirus (COVID-19)—implications for property

News Analysis: Pandemic rent recovery—analysis of the proposed arbitration scheme

Since this content was first published, the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Bill has received Royal Assent. It became law on 24 March 2022.  A link to the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 can be found here. Please note that the links in the article relate to Lexis PSL content so will only be available to subscribers of that service.


This content was first published on the Lexis Nexis Ask Forum. For more information please contact Laura Bushaway or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • Mental Health Management

    Nick Hurley

    Events

  • Calculating Social Value in BTR

    Francis Ho

    Events

  • Dangers of trusts

    Mark Summers

    Events

  • The Evening Standard quotes Rose Carey on the increase in visa fees

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Zenzero’s management team on its majority acquisition by Macquarie Capital

    Mark Howard

    News

  • Updates and points to note in relation to buy-to-let residential properties

    Twiggy Ho

    Insights

  • Felicity Chapman writes for Insider Media on alternatives to court for divorcing business owners

    Felicity Chapman

    In the Press

  • Investment Week quotes Julia Cox on the proposed scrapping of inheritance tax

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands commercial offering with the appointment of Rebecca Steer

    Rebecca Steer

    News

  • The Times quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s preliminary approval of the Activision Blizzard-Microsoft deal

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Heritage property and conditional exemption

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Emma Humphreys on UK rental costs

    Emma Humphreys

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s new set of principles for regulating AI

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Hamish Perry and Mike Barrington write for The Evening Standard on whether a merger between the CBI and Make UK can work

    Hamish Perry

    In the Press

  • Silicon quotes Gareth Mills on the UK consumer lawsuit against Google

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Property Week quotes Louise Ward on the additional support required by aspiring UK life sciences operators

    Louise Ward

    In the Press

  • Sarah Higgins and David Wells-Cole write for Wealth Briefing on the pitfalls of using unregulated legal services

    Sarah Higgins

    In the Press

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Georgina Muskett

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys’ UK offices receive environmental certification

    Kerry Stares

    News

  • Case analysis: URS Corporation Ltd V BDW Trading Ltd

    James Worthington

    Insights

  • True value adjudications; don’t jump the gun!

    Christopher Busaileh

    Insights

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Making BitCoin a BitClearer

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Key takeaways from the UK Government's "Green Day"

    Martha Glaser

    Quick Reads

  • From Holby City to 5 Fleet Place - David Ames shares his experience of "Behind the Lens" with CRS

    Quick Reads

  • The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 in Action

    Sophia Leeder

    Quick Reads

  • This week in the news: inheritance tax interest costs rising due to Probate delays

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • WhatsAppGate - Should businesses be reviewing their social media policies?

    Anna Rogers

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai announces its plan to streamline the enforcement of civil judgments and arbitral awards

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Time to turn down the lights

    Eddie Richards

    Quick Reads

  • Losing their (Elgin) marbles? British Museum and Greek government fail to reach agreement on the Parthenon sculptures

    Louise Paterson

    Quick Reads

  • Youth Mobility Scheme visa category: now open!

    Kayleigh McKee

    Quick Reads

  • Part 1: The Tip of the Triangle – Examining London’s Potential in the Life Sciences Sector

    Amy Shuttleworth

    Quick Reads

  • Reporting Restriction Order (reprised) - "Where there is no publicity there is no justice."

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Mixed-use development and Sustainability is at the heart of Life Sciences Development

    Fiona Edmond

    Quick Reads

  • Interim Reporting Restriction Order - More Moderate Mostyn? Or Purely Protective Prudence?

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

Back to top