• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Update: The stay on business tenancy terminations continues

min read

The Coronavirus Act 2020 (“the Act”) came into force on 25 March 2020.  For landlords and tenants in England and Wales, the Act immediately prevented a landlord from terminating certain business tenancies through forfeiture for non-payment of rent – a restriction initially imposed until 30 June 2020.  This date was subsequently extended to 30 September 2020, 31 December 2020, 31 March 2021 and 30 June 2021. 

The Government has now announced that the moratorium on the forfeiture of business tenancies will be further extended until 25 March 2022. Powers remain available in the Act for further extensions beyond this date. 

The Government’s position remains that any tenants who can pay all or any of their rent should do so and where tenants’ businesses have been forced to close, they should start paying their rent as soon as the restrictions change.

The latest extension is contained within The Business Tenancies (Protection from Forfeiture: Relevant Period) (Coronavirus) (England) (No. 2) Regulations 2021 (“the Regulations”) which will come into force on 30 June 2021.

The restrictions apply to forfeiture by a landlord instructing a bailiff to change the locks as well as to forfeiture proceedings via the Court.

What tenancies do the restrictions apply to?

The Act states that the restrictions benefit any business tenancy to which Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (“the 1954 Act”) applies.  The Explanatory Notes accompanying the Act confirm that the Government intends it to also apply to leases where the protection of the 1954 Act is excluded.  The provisions also seek to cover lawful subtenants.

Does it apply to rent or other payments under the lease including service charge and insurance?

Yes, the definition of rent extends to any sum payable under the business tenancy including insurance, service charges and interest.

If the landlord enters into discussions with a commercial tenant in relation to the sums owed, could it lose the right to forfeit for non-payment of these sums?

No – the Act states that the landlord’s conduct during the relevant period (25 March 2020 to 25 March 2022) will not be treated as waiving the right to forfeit for non-payment of rent unless the landlord gives an express wavier of the right to forfeit in writing.  In effect, the landlord’s right to forfeit for unpaid rent is “frozen” until 26 March 2022.  The Act states that the right to forfeit will be preserved for non-payment of rent.

If the parties agree a rent concession, the question of whether there will be changes to the landlord’s right to forfeit for non-payment of rent will depend upon the precise terms of the rent concession agreement.

What about existing forfeiture proceedings?

Under the Civil Procedure Rules, a stay on possession proceedings and enforcement of orders for possession was put into place until 20 September 2020.  However, this has now been lifted.  Nonetheless, the restrictions of the Coronavirus Act 2020 mean that landlords are still not entitled to issue any forfeiture proceedings for arrears which fell due since 25 March 2020.  Moreover, under the Act and the Regulations, Courts will not be able to make a possession order which requires a tenant to give possession of business premises for non-payment of rent to the landlord before 26 March 2022. 

What will happen when the restrictions are lifted?

The Government launched a call for evidence which closed on 4 May 2021 to assess the progress of negotiations between landlords and tenants in relation to commercial rents and to determine whether the stay on business tenancy terminations would be lifted on 30 June 2021, extended, or there would be some other course of action (see here for more information on the call for evidence).  The Government’s formal response to the call for evidence is awaited.  However, the Government has announced that in addition to the extension of the forfeiture moratorium to 25 March 2022, arrears which have arisen during periods where a tenant business was forced to close a result of a Lockdown will be “ringfenced” and landlords and tenants encouraged to reach agreement regarding arrears.  Where agreement cannot be reached, there will be new legislation to create a binding arbitration process (see here for further details).

The restrictions detailed above have been removed.  Please refer to our latest guidance in our March 2022 Quarter Day page which can be found here.

In this fast-paced period of unprecedented change, if landlords or tenants have any further questions about the operation of the Act and how it may affect them, please do not hesitate to contact Emma Humphreys, Laura Bushaway or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • 5 Things You Need to Know about Greenwashing

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Jamie Kennaugh comments in Investors’ Chronicle on how couples can safeguard their finances

    Jamie Kennaugh

    In the Press

    min read
  • EU ESG Ratings Regulation: what providers need to know ahead of the July 2026 deadline

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys is shortlisted for Team of the Year: Legal Transformation at The Lawyer Awards 2026

    Tessa Bartley

    News

    min read
  • Anti-greenwashing in the UK and EU: the risk landscape and best practice guidance

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • TCC allows Building Liability Order based on an Adjudicator’s Decision and an ‘Anticipatory’ Building Liability Order

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

    min read
  • Corporate human rights due diligence – episode 2: practical insights from the experts

    Kerry Stares

    Podcasts

  • The Sky’s the Limit: Arbitrating Aviation Disputes

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

    min read
  • Mike Barrington comments on the impact of Standard Life's Aegon acquisition for the insurance market, in Insurance Business, IFA Magazine, Wealth DFM, Professional Adviser, and International Adviser

    Mike Barrington

    In the Press

    min read
  • eprivateclient features an article by Matt Foster and Sarah Moore on untangling crypto assets in divorce

    Matt Foster

    In the Press

    min read
  • Bloomberg Tax quotes Sally Ashford on the forthcoming HMRC requirement for lawyers to register as tax advisers

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

    min read
  • Nicola Thorpe comments in The Telegraph on the importance of certainty for non-doms considering moving to the UK

    Nicola Thorpe

    In the Press

    min read
  • Iwan Thomas comments in Business Green on the acquisition of Huel by Danone

    Iwan Thomas

    In the Press

    min read
  • 10 ways the new APR/BPR rules affect estate administration

    Mary Perham

    Insights

    min read
  • ITV News interviews Ben Smith about a parliamentary debate around statutory menstrual leave

    Ben Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Clarification given by the Court of Appeal on rights of first refusal under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987

    Natalie Deuchar

    Insights

    min read
  • Choosing the Right PISCES Platform for Private Company Liquidity

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • How to construe contentious trusts - lessons from recent cases

    Sarah Moore

    Insights

    min read
Back to top