• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Simplifying use classes: adding flexibility for businesses to adapt

An overhaul of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 is intended to provide much needed flexibility for businesses to adapt and diversify to meet changing demands. The legislation has been laid before Parliament and is expected to come into force on 1 September 2020.

How are the use classes changing?

Planning permission is not generally required to move between uses in the same use class. If a use is specified not to fall within a use class (referred to as sui generis), then it does not benefit from such flexibility.

From 1 September 2020, significant changes to the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 will amend the use classes for England only.  The A and D use classes will be removed and the changes will create wider new use classes namely:

  • Class E (commercial, business and service) – broadly incorporating the previous retail use classes A1 to A3 (shops, financial and professional services and restaurants and cafes) and B1 use class (offices, research and development and industrial processes which can take place without impact on amenity). It also includes gyms, nurseries and health centres.
  • Class F.1 (learning and non-residential institutions) – this comprises certain uses from the former D1 use class likely to be in public use, including uses for education, display of art, museums, libraries, public halls, places of worship and courts.
  • Class F.2 (local community) – this comprises swimming pools, skating rinks, areas for outdoor sports, community halls or meeting places together with certain local shops ie those mostly selling essential goods including food to the public of up to 280m2 where there is no other such facility within 1000m.

The residential (C), general industrial (B2) and storage and distribution (B8) use classes will remain unchanged.

A number of additional uses will be listed as sui generis and outside any use class including cinemas, concert, dance and bingo halls, live music venues, hot food takeaways, public houses, wine bars and drinking establishments (with or without expanded food provision).

Why are the changes required?

The current Use Classes Order was introduced in 1987 and has been amended a number of times since to reflect changes in the way land is used over time and prevent changes that could impact upon amenity.

Many traditional high streets are in decline. Even before COVID-19, shopping was increasingly done on-line and many retail operators were adapting their business models to offer a wider leisure experience. Changes of use often require planning permission and whether permission is granted depends on the local planning authority’s policies for a particular area.

The Government considers that the new use classes will better reflect the diversity of uses found on high streets and in town centres and provide flexibility for businesses to adapt and diversify to meet changing demands. This will promote vitality and viability of town centres by speeding up the ability of landlords and tenants to respond to rapid changes in the retail and leisure sectors - all the more important as our centres seek to recover from the economic impact of COVID-19.

How will I benefit from the changes?

The increased flexibility will be welcomed by many landlords, business owners and fund/asset managers with vacant premises or assets that require repositioning.  Local planning authorities will need to re-think their policies and strategies for town centres, to reflect the new use classes and the potential for a more diverse range of uses.

The new use classes will provide an opportunity to respond to new trends and behaviours which may follow the pandemic, such as the need and desire to work flexibly and have access to a wider range of local facilities. Alongside permitted development rights and planning applications to introduce residential properties, centres could provide office, social, medical, leisure and entertainment facilities.

The use classes will allow more flexible use of individual properties to reflect changing retail and business models.  A building may be in a number of uses concurrently (eg a café and a shop) or in different uses at different times of the day. Changes to the mix of uses within a use class will not require planning permission.

What else do I need to know?

You should check carefully whether you can benefit from the rights. Consider whether existing planning permissions and agreements affect your ability to change use. Check other documents, such as leases, to see what uses are permitted.  Planning permission may still be required for works necessary to allow changes of use to proceed. Consider also whether other consents are required. 

In addition to the flexibility offered by use classes, permitted development rights apply in relation to certain uses (for example drinking establishments can offer “enhanced food provision” under permitted development rights).  From 1 September 2020 to 31 July 2021, existing permitted development rights will continue to apply based on the current use classes.  New, revised, permitted development rights are expected in due course.  

Article 4 Directions (which can remove permitted development rights) can be made, modified or cancelled by reference to the existing use classes during the same period. Article 4 Directions made before 1 September 2020 will continue to have effect in any event.

Where applications for planning permission or reserved matters approval are submitted before 1 September 2020 which refer to the existing use classes, the application will be determined by reference to those use classes.

The Government intends to update the Planning Practice Guidance to reflect the new changes before they come into effect on 1 September 2020.  We will provide a further update on these changes when they become available.

Our thinking

  • Seminar: National Association of Independent Administrators

    Events

  • Julia Cox, Harriet Betteridge and Alexandra Clarke write for Tax Journal on who might be considered the ‘winners’ and ‘losers’ from an IHT perspective following the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the long-awaited SkyKick v Sky Supreme Court decision

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Charlotte Duly writes for World Intellectual Property Review on the Bluebird trademark dispute

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Law.com International interviews Robert Reymond on the growth of our Latin America desk

    Robert Reymond

    In the Press

  • Autumn Budget 2024 – Charities – points you might have missed

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Internationally competitive? The post-April 2025 tax rules for non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Global Investigations Review quotes Rhys Novak on the UK government’s new guidance on complying with its forthcoming failure to prevent fraud offence

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • What does the budget mean for the logistics sector?

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

  • Under my umbr-ETA, ESTA, eh eh… FAO: international visitors to UK from 8 January 2025 – avoid rain and flight anxiety

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • National Infrastructure Commission’s Report on Cost Drivers of Major Infrastructure Projects in the UK

    Charlotte Marsh

    Insights

  • Golden Brick Reform – a gap in the budget?

    Anna Donnelly

    Quick Reads

  • Global Legal Post quotes James Walton on the CJC's interim report into litigation funding

    James Walton

    In the Press

  • Family Court Reporting Week - supporting journalists to report family court cases

    Dhara Shah

    Quick Reads

  • Passing on family wealth – the Family Law impact of the new inheritance tax changes

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Potential parental disputes about school fees now VAT is to be added

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • The new guidance on the offence of failing to prevent fraud – will it lead to a sea-change to anti-fraud compliance mechanisms?

    Rhys Novak

    Quick Reads

  • What constitutes “possession” and its importance (and relevance) for correctly calculating your SDLT liability

    Pippa Clifford

    Insights

  • Building Safety for Higher Risk Buildings – How is the Regulatory Regime bedding in?

    Kate Knox

    Insights

  • Navigating the Digital Services Act and Online Safety Act: A Quick Guide for Digital Platform Providers on the need to police content

    Dillon Ravikumar

    Quick Reads

Back to top