• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Q&A: The extent of a right of way to use vehicles


Is if a neighbour’s stable door opens onto our client’s property, is that trespass, or is there an implied right to open such door?


Trespass to land is a tort which includes physically entering or remaining on land in the possession of another or placing an object on or projecting over the land in possession of another. The act must be carried out without a licence or consent. 


Ellis v Loftus Iron Co [1874] LR 10 CP 10

Trespass extends to any unjustifiable intrusion by one person upon land in the possession of another. Indeed, it has been said that ‘if the defendant place a part of his foot on the plaintiff's land unlawfully, it is in law as much a trespass as if he had walked half a mile on it’ (Ellis v Loftus Iron Co).

It is not clear what loss has been suffered by the opening of the stable door onto the land. However, trespass is actionable even without damage or detriment being suffered. 


Gregory v Piper [1829] 109 ER 220Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co [1957] 2 QB 334London Borough of Enfield v Outdoor Plus Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 608

Examples of relatively ‘minor’ acts of trespass may include the following:

  • if a defendant has placed something against the claimant’s wall (Gregory v Piper)
  • a sign projecting over the claimant’s shop (Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co), and
  • a hoarding on the land over another (London Borough of Enfield v Outdoor Plus Ltd)

The circumstances explained are likely to amount to a trespass, provided the neighbour has not been given express permission to open the stable door onto the land or acquired an implied right to do so. An implied right may have been acquired in this case by necessity, common intention between the parties or prescription.

For further information, see Practice Notes:

This content was first published on the Lexis Nexis Ask Forum. For more information, please contact Emma Preece.

Our thinking

  • Calculating Social Value in BTR

    Francis Ho


  • Heritage property and conditional exemption

    Sarah Wray


  • Stamp Duty Refund - New Impetus To Eligible Incoming Talents

    Ian Devereux


  • City AM quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s new set of principles for regulating AI

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Hamish Perry and Mike Barrington write for The Evening Standard on whether a merger between the CBI and Make UK can work

    Hamish Perry

    In the Press

  • Silicon quotes Gareth Mills on the UK consumer lawsuit against Google

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Common construction claims in Bahrain

    Mazin Al Mardhi


  • Property Week quotes Louise Ward on the additional support required by aspiring UK life sciences operators

    Louise Ward

    In the Press

  • Sarah Higgins and David Wells-Cole write for Wealth Briefing on the pitfalls of using unregulated legal services

    Sarah Higgins

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys’ UK offices receive environmental certification

    Kerry Stares


  • Case analysis: URS Corporation Ltd V BDW Trading Ltd

    James Worthington


  • True value adjudications; don’t jump the gun!

    Christopher Busaileh


  • Financial Reporter quotes Rhys Novak on a new FCA review into the treatment of PEPs

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • In-House Insights Programme 23/24

    Megan Paul


  • Restrictive covenants – who has the benefit?

    Georgina Muskett


  • First time buyers relief and trusts

    Sarah Wray


  • City AM quotes Ashwin Pillay on the latest round of ONS M&A statistics

    Ashwin Pillay

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: Top 5 Notice Traps

    Emma Humphreys


  • Football Insider quotes Kelvin Tanner and Owen Chan on how the ESC Endorsement Path could affect scouting and transfers

    Kelvin Tanner

    In the Press

  • The Financial Times quotes Julia Cox on tax planning under a potential Labour government

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

Back to top