• news-banner

    Expert Insights

COVID-19 landlord and tenant questions answered

Question

We usually undertake routine landlord inspections, repairs, etc for our properties, but are these tasks “essential” during the Covid-19 situation?

Answer

There is a helpful government guidance note with examples of work that is likely to be considered as essential to address serious and urgent issues. Certain other tasks should continue where it is reasonable and safe to do so, eg inspecting and testing fire alarm and emergency lighting systems and complying with gas and electrical safety regulations. There is separate guidance on taking precautions during visits by contractors and others, including avoiding direct contact.

Explanation

The government has recently published guidance for landlords and tenants to understand and comply with rights and responsibilities during the Covid-19 outbreak, which covers property access for health and safety reasons (www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-and-renting-guidance-for-landlords-tenants-and-local-authorities).

Landlords and tenants are encouraged to work together and take a “pragmatic, common-sense approach” – especially when dealing with non-urgent matters. Local authorities have been encouraged to take a “pragmatic approach to enforcement” and landlords should not be unfairly penalised where the restrictions prevent them from meeting some routine obligations.

This does not absolve landlords from addressing dangerous conditions. Tenants will continue to have local authority support over such matters. Urgent health and safety issues are described as those which affect a tenant’s ability “to live safely” and maintain “mental and physical health”, which leans towards residential tenancies. However, many examples in the guidance note could apply to both commercial and residential property and include:

  • problems with the building fabric, eg roof leaks;
  • issues leading to a lack of heating, hot water or washing/toilet facilities;
  • issues with white goods;
  • security problems;
  • equipment relied on by a disabled person.

The guidance recommends that tenants should communicate early about problems and landlords should keep records of efforts made to address issues. For urgent issues, parties should co-operate to enable inspections and/or remedial works – provided it is in line with government guidance.

The guidance confirms certain routine safety tasks are still essential. For example, inspectors or maintenance workers can visit multi-occupied properties to inspect and test fire alarms and emergency lighting. Where it isn’t possible, landlords must demonstrate they have taken all reasonable steps to comply with the law.

Question

I am a struggling retailer and have been told my landlord cannot forfeit my lease if I don’t pay rent. What does this mean and what can my landlord do if I don’t pay?

Answer

There is a temporary moratorium on the forfeiture of commercial leases until 30 June. Forfeiture therefore cannot be used at present to terminate your lease or put pressure on you to settle unpaid rent, etc. But you are still obliged to pay the rent and your landlord may be able to pursue other remedies to recover sums owed. If you are struggling with cash flow, it would be sensible to try to reach a suitable agreement with your landlord to vary your rent liabilities temporarily.

Since publication, the Government has announced an extension to the moratorium to 30 September 2020. For further information, please see our Insight: Update: A further stay on business tenancy terminations.

Explanation

The Coronavirus Act 2020 was passed as emergency legislation on 25 March 2020. Section 82 imposes a moratorium on forfeiture for non-payment of rent. Tenants have therefore been given a short-term reprieve against leases being terminated by forfeiture for non-payment (either by re-entry or court proceedings).

The moratorium operates from 26 March until 30 June 2020 (subject to extension) and covers any lease to which Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 applies (seemingly including contracted out leases), subtenants and other lawful occupiers under a tenancy and existing forfeiture claims.

However, tenants should note:

  • This is not a rent suspension. The measures are recognition that businesses struggling with cash flow due to Covid-19 are worried about eviction. But the underlying contractual obligations are unaffected and rent and other sums under the lease will continue to fall due (unless the parties agree concessions).
  • This only affects forfeiture for unpaid rent. In principle, landlords can still forfeit for other reasons, exercise break rights and pursue other remedies for non-payment. But there will be practical difficulties with the courts’ capacity to hear claims and attendance by bailiffs to enforce orders.
  • Unless the landlord gives an express waiver in writing, it retains the right to take forfeiture action in the future.

This article was written by Partner Emma Humphreys at Charles Russell Speechlys and  Barrister Myriam Stacey at Landmark Chambers and appeared over 8 weeks ago in Estates Gazette. 

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Year of the Horse Celebration

    Edith Lai

    Events

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Residential PEEPs Breakfast Panel

    Richard Flenley

    Events

  • Commonhold: Best Supporting Tenure or Leading Role?

    Sarah Bradd

    Quick Reads

  • AI and Consumer Law: Transparency, Fairness and Emerging Regulation

    Rachel Bell

    Insights

  • AI and Data Protection

    Victor Mound

    Insights

  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Biodiversity Net Gain: VAT considerations for Land Managers

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes Francis Ho on John Lewis shelving its build-to-rent property plans

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey and Charlotte Hill on how the Property (Digital Assets) Act in the UK is impacting private clients

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Navigating ESG Regulatory Change in Supply Chain Contracts

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Sally Ashford comments in Spear's, IFA Magazine, and eprivateclient on the UK Spring Statement

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Tamasin Perkins writes for IFA Magazine on risks arising from the intersection of family wealth and commercial lending

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: how to prepare for Martyn’s Law

    Ben Butterworth

    Podcasts

  • Iwan Thomas explores Nestlé’s ice cream exit in Food Manufacture

    Iwan Thomas

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises TPE on first PISCES share sale: Unlocking Liquidity in Oxford Science Enterprises

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    News

Back to top