• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Amended CRAR Regulations

min read

The Regulations originally changing the use of CRAR came into force on 24 April 2020. The Taking Control of Goods and Certification of Enforcement Agents (Amendment) (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020 provided three key changes (although only the first is really headline grabbing):

  • An increase of the threshold before CRAR can be exercised in the first place – from 7 days’ rent arrears to 90 days, for enforcement notices given between 25 April and 30 June 2020;
  • An extension, in certain circumstances, to the date by which an enforcement agent must have taken control of goods if the notice of enforcement is not to lapse; and
  • An extension of the 2 year enforcement certificate that enforcement agents must hold in order to act in that capacity (again, in certain circumstances).

There have been a number of further amendments to the Regulations as the effects of the pandemic have continued. The resulting thresholds before CRAR can be exercised were ultimately increased as follows:

  • 276 days’ rent arrears for enforcement notices given before 24 December 2020 (or where goods are taken control of for the first time on or before 24 December 2020)
  • 366 days’ rent arrears for enforcement notices served between  25 December 2020 – 24 March 2021
  • 457 days’ rent arrears for enforcement notices served between 25 March 2021 – 23 June 2021
  • 554 days’ rent arrears for enforcement notices served from 24 June 2021

As with all COVID-19 related legislation, there was, as we anticipated in March, the potential that the restrictions could be further extended in due course. When introducing the changes in March 2021, the Government noted that they would:

“…not only facilitate the faster recovery of businesses, but also provide additional protection and flexibility in managing their finances. This is in line with measures already taken by the Government to protect business tenancies from forfeiture and to encourage creditors to show forbearance to businesses affected by coronavirus.”

Nonetheless, the Government also emphasised that:

“The restriction on the use of CRAR and associated measures are not a rent holiday and tenants remain liable for payment of any rent arrears.”

Indeed, recently and as covered elsewhere in our Quarter Day update, other recovery mechanisms, such as insolvency and forfeiture, have been extended again.  There has been no further extension to the CRAR rules such that the 554 day time limit referred to above remains in force.

The restrictions detailed above have been removed.  Please refer to our latest guidance in our March 2022 Quarter Day page which can be found here.

For more information, please contact Emma Humphreys or Richard Flenley or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • In-House Insights: Next Gen Drinks Reception

    Events

    min read
  • How do the King’s Speech Bills Answer the New Energy Reality?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • The UAE's New Civil Code: Implications for Construction Contracts

    Maher Al Nashar

    Events

    min read
  • Options for Retail, Hospitality and Leisure Tenants in Dubai: Re-Negotiating Lease Obligations in Unprecedented Times

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
  • ‘Sharenting’ and consent – UAE ruling on posting photos of children online

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys’ Research & Information Services Team wins BIALL Lexis Nexis Award for Excellence 2026

    Jas Breslin

    News

    min read
  • ‘Don’t Lose Ur Head’…But It Might Lose You Money: Conduct in the No-Fault Divorce Era

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Darren Bailey comments in City AM about mandatory release clauses and the future of football transfers

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • US – UK Energy Collaboration

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the shareholders of Pooky Lighting on its acquisition by leading US lighting company Visual Comfort & Co.

    David Coates

    News

    min read
  • Welfare always prevails? The implications of A & B v C & D [2026] EWHC 972 (Fam) for UK domestic and overseas surrogacy

    Ben Haynes

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Claudine Morgan, Hannah Gornall and Ellen Roberts write in New Law Journal about the implications of a landmark anti-SLAPP judgment

    Claudine Morgan

    In the Press

    min read
  • Spear's features William Longrigg's views on potential reforms to the UK family court and the reintroduction of Calderbank offers

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Jonathan Burt comments in Bloomberg Tax about HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Property Patter: the latest on tenant CVAs and Restructuring Plans

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • India-UAE BIT 2024: What to Expect When You’re Investing

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client SPS on its acquisition of Cleardata

    Hamish Perry

    News

    min read
  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys awarded “Legal Advisers of the Year” at the HealthInvestor Awards 2026

    David Coates

    News

    min read
Back to top