• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Social Investment Tax Relief (SITR)

Introduced in 2014, and expanded in 2017, Social Investment Tax Relief (SITR) allows individuals to help social enterprises grow by offering a tax relief on investments.

Under SITR an individual can subscribe for shares in, or lend money to, a social enterprise and claim 30% income tax relief. If, for example, an investor lends £1,000 to a social enterprise, the real cost to the investor is only £700. But the social enterprise receives £1,000 of much needed funding to help it grow in a sustainable manner and achieve more positive social impact.

Charities, community interest companies, certain kinds of community benefit societies and so-called “accredited social impact contractors”1 qualify as “social enterprises” for the purposes of SITR. Social enterprises that have been generating sales revenues for less than 7 years can raise up to £1.5m under SITR. Older enterprises can raise up to around £280k-£290K2.

Here are the tax reliefs that an investor, under SITR, may enjoy:

  • Income Tax Relief – 30% of the amount invested is deducted from the investor’s income tax liability for the year in which the investment is made.
  • Capital Gains Tax Deferral – if a chargeable gain is re-invested into a SITR-qualifying investment, the CGT liability on that gain is deferred until the SITR investment is disposed of.
  • Tax Free Gains – gains made on disposal are free of capital gains tax. But this only applies to capital gains – e.g. on sales of shares. Interest and redemption premium on debt would be taxed as income and are therefore not tax free.

Investments in shares may qualify for exemption from inheritance tax if they have been held for at least two years before death. Investments by way of loans will not, however, qualify for any exemption from IHT.

Investments in shares may qualify for loss relief against income or capital gains tax, but debt will not qualify for loss relief against income tax and only qualifies for relief against capital gains in certain circumstances.

Investors looking to make investments under SITR may invest in individual social enterprises, or via a SITR “fund”. SITR funds work in exactly the same way as an unapproved EIS fund, namely:

  • Each investor signs some form of investment management agreement which gives a mandate to the fund manager to invest the investor’s money into social enterprises eligible for SITR.
  • Investors’ monies are invested over a period of time (usually spanning two or three tax years).
  • Each time a SITR-qualifying investment is made by the fund, each investor is allocated a proportion of the investment and tax relief is then claimed on that investment.
  • The investment is typically held in the name of a nominee on behalf of each of the investors in the fund.
  • Unlike EIS, there is no concept of an “approved” SITR fund. Tax relief can only therefore be claimed as and when qualifying investments are made via the fund – there is no tax relief when an investor initially commits monies to the fund. However, an investor may be able to carry back an investment to the previous tax year in order to accelerate the claim for income tax relief.

The Chancellor’s decision in the Spring Budget to extend SITR until April 2023 means that the immediate prospect of losing it altogether has been avoided for the time being. The two-year extension has been welcomed by many as a positive step. Big Society Capital, along with Social Enterprise UK, Resonance and Co-ops UK, had campaigned to retain and develop SITR. It still has significant potential to stimulate investment in charities and social enterprises, providing much-needed, affordable investment to these organisations. The extension does, however, beg the question of the kind of reforms currently needed to enable SITR to achieve its full potential. Now that a decision about SITR has been made, there is the possibility that it may result in adjustments to the scheme to render it more beneficial such as:

  • Allowing a wider range of charities and social enterprises to be eligible by removing the restrictions that exclude larger charities.
  • Allowing a wider range of activities by extending the accreditation scheme for nursing and care homes to cover other excluded activities.
  • Taking advantage of the opportunities offered by the post-Brexit landscape (the government is currently consulting on a replacement state aid regime, offering the hope that SITR may have greater flexibility in the future).

1 Newly-incorporated private companies that enter into social impact contracts and are accredited by DCMS.
2 The exact cap is calculated by reference to the exchange rate with the Euro, and the highest UK rate of capital gains tax and will therefore fluctuate.

Our thinking

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Resilience in Entrepreneurship

    Events

  • UK Home Office made £329 million profit from Skilled Worker visas in a year but will not replace the Sponsor Management System until late 2028

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • New EU regulations for importing cultural property into the EU – what art collectors need to know

    Suzanne Marriott

    Quick Reads

  • Adjudicators can hear legacy building safety defect claims: BDW Trading Limited v Ardmore Construction Limited [2024] EWHC 3235

    Melanie Tomlin

    Insights

  • Client Conversations Podcast: Giles Pocock

    Simon Ridpath

    Podcasts

  • The first case on Information Orders in connection with Building Liability Orders: BDW Trading Limited v. Ardmore Construction Limited & Ors

    Ogooluwa Esther Michael-John

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys ‘Client Conversations’ features Giles Pocock – VP of Brand and Marketing at Bowers & Wilkins

    Simon Ridpath

    Podcasts

  • Double trouble: the Finance Act 2025 relief for re-remittances

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Guide to launching online consumer brands in the UK – 10 essential steps

    Rebecca Steer

    Insights

  • Structuring the bank of mum and dad

    William Marriott

    Insights

  • Sarah Higgins, Sarah Jane Boon, Miranda Fisher and Charlotte Posnansky write for Family Law Journal on how the 2024 budget is impacting family law

    Sarah Higgins

    In the Press

  • Family Offices and Succession Planning – handing over the reins

    Graeme Kleiner

    Quick Reads

  • eprivateclient quotes Nicola Saccardo and Daniele Mologni on why Italy is an increasingly popular destination for high-net-worth individuals looking to relocate

    Nicola Saccardo

    In the Press

  • Helliwell v Entwistle Live

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys is shortlisted in six categories in the Law.com International European Legal Innovation & Tech Awards 2025

    News

  • Sarah Wray writes for Professional Adviser on the inheritance tax consultation on agricultural and business property relief

    Sarah Wray

    In the Press

  • Carris Peacey and Sylwia Jatczak write for R3 RECOVERY Magazine on the Building Safety Act 2022 and the obligations on IPs

    Carris Peacey

    In the Press

  • The EU Omnibus: resetting the rules on sustainability reporting

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • The Lawyer covers our Russell Up scheme and the number of trainee innovation projects it is delivering

    Joe Cohen

    In the Press

Back to top