• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Cladding/EWS1 Form – What’s it all about?

min read

It is good news that the housing market can continue to operate, with appropriate safeguards, throughout this third national lockdown. People will be keen for their transactions to progress quickly so they can benefit from the Stamp Duty Land Tax savings that currently end on 31 March 2021.  It is therefore important to address any potential delays at an early stage. One issue that has been causing delays on leasehold transactions is the need for Form EWS1.

What is Form EWS1?

EWS stands for external wall system.  The external fire wall review form is intended to be a standard way of recording what assessment has been carried out for the external wall construction of residential apartment buildings over 18 metres OR where specific concerns exist. 

Following the tragedy of the Grenfell Tower fire there has been a focus on removing combustible cladding from the external walls of high-rise buildings.  The government issued guidance for building owners in December 2018 advising them to ensure that external wall systems were “safe”.  Lenders became concerned that flats in high-rise blocks would not represent good security without external wall checks.  Some surveyors valued flats at zero or significantly reduced values if there was insufficient evidence showing compliance with the government’s published guidance.  Form EWS1 was introduced in December 2019 as a set way for a building owner to confirm to valuers and lenders that any external cladding system present had been assessed by a suitable expert. 

What is the problem?

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) led a cross-industry working group in developing the EWS1 process and the aim was to help people buy and sell homes and re-mortgage.  Unfortunately, difficulties in obtaining the form and issues with the form being requested more widely than originally intended has meant that its introduction has actually led to more delays and problems with transactions.

The form originally only applied to buildings above 18 metres (six storeys).  It was  subsequently amended to reflect the new consolidated Government guidance issued by the government in January 2020 (Advice for Building Owners of Multi-storey, Multi-occupied Residential Buildings) which states “The need to assess and manage the risk of external fire spread applies to buildings of any height.”  Following this guidance the form was routinely being requested by lenders for lower level buildings.  However, the guidance on the RICS website specifically states that the new guidance “…mean[s] some residential buildings below 18m which have ‘specific concerns’, may now require an EWS1” (emphasis added). 

Therefore the form being requested without proper justification in some cases was one of the reasons for delaying transactions.  In November 2020, the government issued a statement confirming that owners of flats in buildings without cladding will no longer need a EWS1 form to sell or re-mortgage their property.  The government’s hope was that this would enable surveyors to take a more proportionate approach to when a EWS1 form was needed and estimated that this would benefit nearly 450,000 homeowners. It is a timely development to have this clarified although the RICS website has actually always stated that “not every building above 18m will require an EWS1 form – only those with some form of combustible material, making them unsafe”.

The November 2020 announcement also included government funding of almost £700,000 to train more assessors.  This reflects the fact that there is an acute shortage of fire engineers to carry out EWS1 assessments with the resultant lengthy delays – even for those properties that are likely to receive a clear EWS1.  

Although this funding is welcome, the government also need to find a solution to the lack of availability of Professional Indemnity Insurance (PII) for this work. EWS1 assessments will only be acceptable if they are underpinned with the necessary PII.

What can been done?

It is vital that at the commencement of any transaction involving these type of properties an assessment is made whether a form EWS1 is likely to be required.  If it is, enquiries should be made immediately with the building owner to see if the building already has a form.  It should be noted that forms are valid for five years but a new one may be required where a building has been altered. 

An important point to be aware of is that the EWS1 process is for building owners to undertake – the form relates to the whole building and not individual flats within it.  The provision of a form EWS1 is entirely discretionary and the building owner is not legally obliged to provide it. Although the government has expressed support for the EWS process, it has not made this a legal requirement. 

As a consequence, a EWS1 is only likely to be available if the building owner was able to find a suitably qualified fire engineer and was able to pass the costs on to the leaseholders.  The issue of who pays for the EWS1, which can be substantial, and any required remediation works if required is not always straightforward - you can read more about some of the relevant issues in our previous Q&A here.

The Future

We can expect to see further developments this year.  The RICS recently launched a consultation on proposed guidance intended to improve consistency when EWS1 forms are requested. The consultation closed on 25 January 2021 with the proposed guidance note due in the Spring.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Succession, governance and the next generation in US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Wei Kang comments on China’s new tax rule on offshore trusts in The Straits Times

    In the Press

    min read
  • A New Era of Wealth and Estate Planning for PRC High-Net-Worth Families

    Wei Kang

    Insights

    min read
  • What Wadworth Tells Us About the Next Phase of PISCES

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Supply chain social audits: what they are, their limitations, and why they matter for human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Building Safety Levy: What Do the Proposed 2026 Amendments Mean?

    Mark Barley

    Insights

    min read
  • Autumn Budget 2026: possible CGT changes and pre-budget planning

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Family team successfully represent high-profile businessman in High Court jurisdiction dispute case

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Private capital, succession planning and cross-border wealth complexity in Asia

    Kevin Lee

    Insights

    min read
  • Can you terminate an “indefinite” trade mark licence even if there’s no express right to do so?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Insights

    min read
  • Technology, AI and US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Reaz Jafri quoted in CNBC on EU crackdown on Caribbean "golden passport" programmes

    In the Press

    min read
  • Shaping the Future of AIM: What the New AIM Rules Mean for Growth Companies, Founders and Advisers

    Paul Arathoon

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge, and Lyla Gilbert write in Packaging Europe about landmark reforms on packaging sustainability regulations in the UK and Europe

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Rebecca Morjaria and Steven Carey write in Building about liability for defective construction products

    Rebecca Morjaria

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top