• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Cladding/EWS1 Form – What’s it all about?

It is good news that the housing market can continue to operate, with appropriate safeguards, throughout this third national lockdown. People will be keen for their transactions to progress quickly so they can benefit from the Stamp Duty Land Tax savings that currently end on 31 March 2021.  It is therefore important to address any potential delays at an early stage. One issue that has been causing delays on leasehold transactions is the need for Form EWS1.

What is Form EWS1?

EWS stands for external wall system.  The external fire wall review form is intended to be a standard way of recording what assessment has been carried out for the external wall construction of residential apartment buildings over 18 metres OR where specific concerns exist. 

Following the tragedy of the Grenfell Tower fire there has been a focus on removing combustible cladding from the external walls of high-rise buildings.  The government issued guidance for building owners in December 2018 advising them to ensure that external wall systems were “safe”.  Lenders became concerned that flats in high-rise blocks would not represent good security without external wall checks.  Some surveyors valued flats at zero or significantly reduced values if there was insufficient evidence showing compliance with the government’s published guidance.  Form EWS1 was introduced in December 2019 as a set way for a building owner to confirm to valuers and lenders that any external cladding system present had been assessed by a suitable expert. 

What is the problem?

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) led a cross-industry working group in developing the EWS1 process and the aim was to help people buy and sell homes and re-mortgage.  Unfortunately, difficulties in obtaining the form and issues with the form being requested more widely than originally intended has meant that its introduction has actually led to more delays and problems with transactions.

The form originally only applied to buildings above 18 metres (six storeys).  It was  subsequently amended to reflect the new consolidated Government guidance issued by the government in January 2020 (Advice for Building Owners of Multi-storey, Multi-occupied Residential Buildings) which states “The need to assess and manage the risk of external fire spread applies to buildings of any height.”  Following this guidance the form was routinely being requested by lenders for lower level buildings.  However, the guidance on the RICS website specifically states that the new guidance “…mean[s] some residential buildings below 18m which have ‘specific concerns’, may now require an EWS1” (emphasis added). 

Therefore the form being requested without proper justification in some cases was one of the reasons for delaying transactions.  In November 2020, the government issued a statement confirming that owners of flats in buildings without cladding will no longer need a EWS1 form to sell or re-mortgage their property.  The government’s hope was that this would enable surveyors to take a more proportionate approach to when a EWS1 form was needed and estimated that this would benefit nearly 450,000 homeowners. It is a timely development to have this clarified although the RICS website has actually always stated that “not every building above 18m will require an EWS1 form – only those with some form of combustible material, making them unsafe”.

The November 2020 announcement also included government funding of almost £700,000 to train more assessors.  This reflects the fact that there is an acute shortage of fire engineers to carry out EWS1 assessments with the resultant lengthy delays – even for those properties that are likely to receive a clear EWS1.  

Although this funding is welcome, the government also need to find a solution to the lack of availability of Professional Indemnity Insurance (PII) for this work. EWS1 assessments will only be acceptable if they are underpinned with the necessary PII.

What can been done?

It is vital that at the commencement of any transaction involving these type of properties an assessment is made whether a form EWS1 is likely to be required.  If it is, enquiries should be made immediately with the building owner to see if the building already has a form.  It should be noted that forms are valid for five years but a new one may be required where a building has been altered. 

An important point to be aware of is that the EWS1 process is for building owners to undertake – the form relates to the whole building and not individual flats within it.  The provision of a form EWS1 is entirely discretionary and the building owner is not legally obliged to provide it. Although the government has expressed support for the EWS process, it has not made this a legal requirement. 

As a consequence, a EWS1 is only likely to be available if the building owner was able to find a suitably qualified fire engineer and was able to pass the costs on to the leaseholders.  The issue of who pays for the EWS1, which can be substantial, and any required remediation works if required is not always straightforward - you can read more about some of the relevant issues in our previous Q&A here.

The Future

We can expect to see further developments this year.  The RICS recently launched a consultation on proposed guidance intended to improve consistency when EWS1 forms are requested. The consultation closed on 25 January 2021 with the proposed guidance note due in the Spring.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2023

    Charlotte Ford

    Events

  • Mental Health Management

    Nick Hurley

    Events

  • James Souter writes for City AM on Meta pulling out of its London office

    James Souter

    In the Press

  • A Labour government: what might be in store for personal taxation?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Private Equity on its £3.5 million investment into TravelLocal

    David Coates

    News

  • China Daily, and other titles, quote Silvia On on trends affecting Chinese HNWIs

    Silvia On

    In the Press

  • The Evening Standard quotes Rose Carey on the increase in visa fees

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • New Hong Kong crypto regime: trading platforms falling foul already?

    Patrick Chan

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Zenzero’s management team on its majority acquisition by Macquarie Capital

    Mark Howard

    News

  • David Savage writes for Construction News on the upcoming building-control overhaul

    David Savage

    In the Press

  • Updates and points to note in relation to buy-to-let residential properties

    Twiggy Ho

    Insights

  • Felicity Chapman writes for Insider Media on alternatives to court for divorcing business owners

    Felicity Chapman

    In the Press

  • Investment Week quotes Julia Cox on the proposed scrapping of inheritance tax

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands commercial offering with the appointment of Rebecca Steer

    Rebecca Steer

    News

  • The Times quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s preliminary approval of the Activision Blizzard-Microsoft deal

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Heritage property and conditional exemption

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • Property Week quotes Cara Imbrailo on Rishi Sunak scrapping MEES requirements for residential landlords

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • The Financial Times quotes Emma Humphreys on UK rental costs

    Emma Humphreys

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s new set of principles for regulating AI

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Vanessa Duff writes for Wealth Briefing on how the Bank of Mum and Dad can help young people get on the property ladder

    Vanessa Duff

    In the Press

  • Hamish Perry and Mike Barrington write for The Evening Standard on whether a merger between the CBI and Make UK can work

    Hamish Perry

    In the Press

  • 5 top tips to make estate administration easier for your executor

    Jessica Dawkins

    Quick Reads

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Georgina Muskett

    Quick Reads

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Inside Britney and Sam’s $10m prenup

    Shivi Rajput

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • NSPCC urges Government to protect children from domestic abuse during holidays

    Shivi Rajput

    Quick Reads

  • A brief look at HMRC v A Taxpayer [2023] UKUT 00182 (TCC)

    Dominic Lawrance

    Quick Reads

  • ATED and the farmhouse

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Million Dollar Footballer With No Assets?

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

  • Are Parental Rights Equal for All Families?

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Atonement and post separation endeavour: wife keeps £1m gift from husband after his affair and will receive a share of his business’ future profits

    Sophia Leeder

    Quick Reads

  • Pensions: change is in the air once again

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Pre-Settled Status to be automatically extended by two years

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Don’t push it… Quincecare duty clarified

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Pandora Papers: HMRC nudge taxpayers to come out of their box

    Hugh Gunson

    Quick Reads

  • Making BitCoin a BitClearer

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

Back to top