• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Will couples who were locked down together stay together? Cohabitation in the wake of COVID-19

In March of this year, when the first lockdown measures were introduced by the Government, many couples were faced with an ultimatum: either move in together or isolate separately, not knowing when restrictions might be lifted. Little did we know then that the strictest measures, requiring different households to maintain social distance, would last for several months. Some couples who chose to lockdown together may have seen the timeline of their relationship accelerated as they found that they rather enjoyed their new co-habitation arrangement. For others, including long-standing couples, lockdown may have had the opposite effect, triggering the breakdown of the relationship. Whilst everyone will have had a unique experience of lockdown in the UK, a number of key themes are emerging which affect all cohabitating couples.

Cohabitation

Whereas choosing to live with another person under ordinary circumstances is typically a carefully thought out step, lockdown meant that couples were thrown together quickly with little opportunity to plan for what this might mean long term. Living together raises a number of questions that couples need to work through, for example, how living expenses, such as rent or mortgage repayments, utility bills and the weekly food bill should be met and divided between them.

Particular care should be taken when one party to the relationship is the property owner. It is extremely important to document how contributions towards living expenses should be treated to prevent the non-owning party from gaining unintended rights in the property. A co-habitation agreement can be a particularly useful tool for setting out each party’s rights and obligations with the aim of protecting both parties in the event of a breakdown of the relationship. If intentions are carefully recorded from the outset this can avoid the need for difficult conversations later down the line and expensive legal bills if things go wrong. Differing perceptions, the passage of time, conflicting documentation and becoming engaged to marry can all become an issue.

It is easy and straightforward to enter into a cohabitation agreement and it can be entered into at any time during a relationship. These agreements are increasingly being entered into by unmarried couples wishing to clarify their understanding of their living arrangements and for those who wish to regulate their financial arrangements both during the relationship and beyond. These agreements can be flexible, bespoke documents which, provided they are carefully drafted, are likely to be binding. We can provide practical and constructive advice on the various complex issues which can arise for cohabitees.

Co-ownership

The increased time at home has been a blessing for some but, for others, lockdown has highlighted inadequacies in their current living arrangements, with lack of outdoor space being a particular challenge for many. Any thoughts of a potential move will only have been amplified by the Government’s recent announcement of a ‘Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) holiday’ until March next year which means that first time buyers will only start paying tax on property above £500,000 and almost everyone buying property above £125,000 should see a reduction in the SDLT they pay. Many couples may be taking this as the opportunity to purchase their first home together.

In terms of financing the first or next step on the property ladder, many couples will be looking to parents to assist with funding the purchase. Parents and grandparents could seek to take advantage of falls in asset values caused by the pandemic and “lock in” current tax rates by passing on wealth to the next generation. The recent Government announcement regarding the planned review of capital gains tax has only added to the uncertainty around the future tax landscape in general with many therefore looking to bring forward any planned gifting or broader tax planning.

Thought should also be given to how any property will be co-owned between the parties. Will contributions towards a deposit from a family member be treated as a loan or a gift and to one or both of the parties? Either way this should be formally documented to ensure that all parties are protected (particularly in the event that the relationship were to breakdown). Alternatively, the family member may instead wish to take an interest in the property, which could enable them to benefit from any increase in value, for example. This might necessitate the preparation of a declaration of trust, designed to set out each party’s interest in the property, including any profit on a future sale. Our Tax, Trusts and Succession and Private Property teams work closely together to ensure that property purchases are carefully structured and interests protected.

With regard to how the purchase is structured between the couple themselves, there are two ways in which property can be jointly owned, as ‘joint tenants’ or ‘tenants in common’. One of the key differences between the two is how each party’s share would pass on death. In the case of joint tenants, the deceased’s share of the property would pass to the surviving co-owner on death. In contrast, if the property is purchased as tenants in common, each party will own a distinct share of the property which they are able to leave to their chosen beneficiaries under a will.  

Touching briefly upon wills, it is a common misconception that assets (such as a property) will automatically pass to your partner on death. Unless you are married, if you have no will in place, then any assets in your sole name will pass to your next of kin (for example your parents if you have no children) rather than to your partner on death. It is therefore important to think about your succession plan and put a will in place, particularly when you are moving in with your partner.

Breakdown of relationships

Unfortunately, for some couples, the lockdown period has been a particularly testing time for their relationship. Working from home together, not being able to go out and see family and friends and also, in some cases, home schooling children, has led to an added strain for many. This enforced period of time together may have exacerbated previous relationships tensions or introduced entirely new issues into the relationship dynamic meaning that some cohabitees wish to separate. We can help guide you through this difficult process and in the case of unmarried couples, provide assistance for property claims and financial claims on behalf of children. It is important to be aware that whilst a separating cohabitee may be entitled to financial support for any children of the relationship (child support or other financial claims on behalf of a child), there is no right to maintenance from the other party if there are no children. It may be, however, that cohabitees will be able to pursue claims against one another in relation to property, which highlights the importance of recording your original intentions in relation to ownership issues from the start as advised above. We can also advise on all child-related issues, such as living arrangements and upbringing including which school children should attend, for example.

We strive to achieve the best possible outcome for all of our clients and their children. It is important to take legal advice from the outset, or if the relationship has already broken down, then to seek assistance at the earliest opportunity. This will enable you to understand your position and help address any concerns you may have before working towards an effective solution and outcome for all parties concerned.

Whether lockdown has been a success or not for your relationship, it is clear that couples need to think carefully about their living arrangements. As a full-service law firm, we are able to bring together members of our Family, Property and Tax teams to support couples with these decisions.

For more information please contact Lauren Clarke at lauren.clarke@crsblaw.com or contact Lucy Hitchen at lucy.hitchen@crsblaw.com.

Our thinking

  • “Keep It Loose”: Flexible Designs for the Life Sciences Sector

    Amelia Hamilton

    Insights

  • The Mail on Sunday quotes Dominic Lawrance on Reeves’s desire to impose inheritance tax on non-doms’ overseas assets

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • The Sunday Times quotes Julia Cox on the impact of potential capital gains tax rises on businesses and entrepreneurs

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Understanding APP Fraud: Legal Strategies & Protection

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the University of Strathclyde on the incorporation and establishment of its Bahrain Campus

    Gareth Mills

    News

  • Grandparents’ Day on 6 October 2024: do grandparents have a legal right to a relationship with their grandchildren?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Claudine Morgan and Mary Barrett write for New Law Journal on liability for costs on discontinuation

    Claudine Morgan

    In the Press

  • Simon Weil writes for Trusts & Trustees on cross-border philanthropy

    Simon Weil

    In the Press

  • Richard Ellis writes for Finextra on when Fintechs do and do not require FCA authorisation

    Richard Ellis

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys maintains strong Tier 1 showing in Legal 500 UK Solicitors Rankings 2025

    Simon Ridpath

    News

  • Relocating to Switzerland: Swiss tax residency

    Grégoire Uldry

    Insights

  • Semiconductor Industry: Commercial & IP Considerations

    Rebecca Steer

    Insights

  • ITV News, The Guardian, City AM, The Daily Express and various other local titles quote Michael Powner on the Tips Act

    Michael Powner

    In the Press

  • Consequences of the abolition of the non-dom regime: what are the family law issues for wealthy clients leaving the UK?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • The New UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard 2024 – piloting towards a brighter future?

    Tegan Johnson

    Insights

  • Martyn’s Law / the Protect Duty: new Bill published

    Rory Partridge

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Sophie Dworetzsky on the potential watering down of Labour’s non-dom tax plans

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    In the Press

  • The Banker quotes Victoria Younghusband on the appointment of Bettina Orlopp as Commerzbank's new CEO

    Victoria Younghusband

    In the Press

  • Swiss estates: would a 50% tax on the super-rich be appropriate?

    Alexia Egger Castillo

    Quick Reads

  • Joe Cohen comments on the Generative AI rollout at our Firm in an interview with Artificial Lawyer

    Joe Cohen

    In the Press

Back to top