• news-banner

    Expert Insights

The regulation of big tech: a changing tide?

As at December 2020, the market capitalisation of the main market players Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Alphabet (Google’s parent) taken together was US$5.7 trillion. Big Tech is undeniably huge.

These companies have evolved over the years to play a fundamental role in the functioning of society. These companies attribute their success in large part to their focus on and monetisation of the collection of consumer data.

As the services of these tech giants have become increasingly interwoven into the daily activities of consumers, there have been increasing calls from the public for these firms to be regulated.

Governments globally have therefore started to take action in response but this is no small exercise. This article focuses on the UK Government’s recent response, but arguably a co-ordinated worldwide approach for any regulation to be meaningfully effective is needed.

There are two main areas where the UK is increasing the regulation of Big Tech in 2021:

Moderating Content

Social media has revolutionised interactions and connectivity in recent years, allowing its users to connect with individuals and access products and information in a wide-reaching way. Despite the many advantages of social media, there are inevitably some significant downsides. Dangerous content, the proliferation of inaccurate information and the increasing toll on mental health as a result of excessive social media usage are all issues that are becoming increasingly concerning.

The Government in 2021 has big plans in this regard. The Government’s approach is outlined in its Online Harms White Paper. It moves beyond the self-regulation of these companies and aims to establish a regulatory regime that will make clear the responsibility of companies to keep its users safe. There will be an independent regulator that will set the standards of safety, report on compliance and have robust enforcement powers including to levy large fines. Therefore, companies effected by the new regulations will need to fully understand their obligations in this regard in order to ensure their compliance.

The UK Government’s proposed regulatory regime hopes to pave the way for the rest of the world to follow suit. Its regime is the first of its kind globally as it will aim to deal with the full array of online harms within one single regulatory framework. Most importantly, under the new regime, companies will owe a duty of care towards users. The Government intends for the Online Safety Bill, which will give effect to the online harms regulatory framework, to be ready this year.

Increasing Competition

There has been growing concern that the large concentration of market power amongst a very small number of technology companies is “curtailing growth in the tech sector, reducing innovation, and potentially having negative impacts on the people and businesses that rely on them.”

Consequently, in April 2021, the UK Government established a Digital Markets Unit (DMU) within the Competition and Markets Unit (CMA). The DMU was set up to ensure that those companies with large market power (‘strategic market status’) are subject to a new regulatory regime that has greater control over the competitiveness of these companies.

The DMU will be in charge of establishing and enforcing a new regulatory regime with a new statutory code of conduct that should result in “consumers [being] given more choice and control over how their data is used, and small businesses [being] able to better promote their products online.”

In practice, the outcome of this is that tech giants may have to share the significant store of information gathered of many years’ with smaller businesses in order to increase competitiveness: in the case of Amazon this would mean sharing its data on users’ shopping habits, in the case of Google its search history information and in the case of Facebook its user engagement knowledge.

Once the full remit of the DMU has been finalised and legislation has been passed (expected in 2022) the full scale of the impact of the changes to be made by the DMU will be more apparent.

Concluding Thoughts

It remains to be seen whether the increase in regulation yields the anticipated result of improving competition and protecting the users of Big Tech. What is clear is that there is likely to be an increased focus on regulation. Digital business is one of the key sectors that will drive economic growth and social progress, so a careful balance of protective measures with government growth priorities will require careful engagement by policymakers and international cooperation.

Our thinking

  • Serious failings by Trustee amount to a breach of trust: Charles Russell Speechlys advises the Hon. Mrs Dawson-Damer in appeal of long-running trust dispute

    Ziva Robertson

    News

  • Understanding the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025: Implications for UK Businesses

    Janine Regan

    Insights

  • Maddie Dunn writes for Farmers Guardian on last month’s Spending Review and the Government’s attitude to farming

    Maddie Dunn

    In the Press

  • ICC Arbitration Statistics 2024 – UAE Breaks into Top 5 Seats

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Why Getty Images v Stability AI Judgment Will Not Answer Our Key Questions

    Nick White

    Insights

  • Georgina Muskett and Laura Bushaway write for Property Week on whether drone use can become trespass

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • How does extradition work?

    Ghassan El Daye

    Insights

  • Extradition in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)

    Ghassan El Daye

    Insights

  • Food Security is National Security: can regenerative agriculture help fortify the UK?

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • To share or not to share, that is the question. The Supreme Court hands down judgment in ‘big money’ divorce case Standish v Standish and clarifies the position regarding matrimonialisation and the sharing principle

    Miranda Fisher

    Insights

  • Joseph Evans, Ethan Khurwolah and Simon Heatley write for Thomson Reuters Practical Law on litigation funding and PACCAR

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • CDR Magazine quotes Simon Le Wita on the Keystone XL pipeline ICSID arbitration

    Simon Le Wita

    In the Press

  • Courts are not couples’ therapists - and that’s a good thing

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

  • Hague Judgments Convention 2019: Easing cross-border recognition and enforcement of judgments between all UK nations, the EU & beyond from 1 July 2025

    Molly Tatchell

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes highly regarded regulatory and investigations litigator Richard Burger in London

    Richard Burger

    News

  • Tuition Tussle: Unveiling the VAT Verdict in the Private School Fees Showdown in the case of "ALR and others v Chancellor of the Exchequer Case"

    Jamie Cartwright

    Insights

  • Litigation funding and PACCAR: reverse, regulate and reform

    Joseph Evans

    Insights

  • Asset Tracing in England and Wales: Legal Tools and Public Resources

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • How to respond to a dawn raid: A guide to dawn raids in financial crime investigations

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

  • Dawn raids in Switzerland: Best practices under the revised criminal procedure code

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Insights

Back to top