• news-banner

    Expert Insights

UK opts out of Unified Patent Court regime

The UK will not be participating in the proposed Unified Patent Court (UPC) regime, despite the country’s ratification of the underlying agreement in April 2018. 

The UK’s participation in the UPC, which was put in doubt by its exit from the EU, would have required it to accept being bound by certain EU laws and decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

The UK Prime Minister’s Office confirmed the UK’s position concerning the UPC following the publication of its position paper titled The Future Relationship with the EU. Read more on this here.

The commencement of the UPC is currently delayed by a challenge being heard by the German constitutional courts. A decision from the court on whether the UPC is compatible with the German constitution is expected sometime this year.

If the German court finds against the complaint, and Germany decides to ratify the UPC agreement, the UPC may still proceed without the UK. Changes will be required to the current UPC agreement, as under its terms the UK was due to host a section of the central division of the UPC, with responsibility for cases in relation to human necessities (including pharmaceuticals), chemistry and metallurgy. It is likely, however, that one of the other countries that has indicated their intention to participate, such as Italy or the Netherlands, will be prepared to fill this role.

The UK continues to be a contracting state to the European Patent Convention (EPC), which oversees the examination and grant of European Patent applications. The EPC is entirely separate from the European Union and has approximately 40 contracting states. These include all the EU countries but also many non-EU ones.

Our thinking

  • Triple Play "Bid Fever": UK Tech's ability to scale and go global

    Mark Howard

    Quick Reads

  • The Future of AI and Copyright Regulation in the UK: The Data (Use and Access) Bill finally gets Lords approval in the UK

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • Representative actions: lessons learnt from two recent cases

    Simon Heatley

    Insights

  • World Intellectual Property Review quotes Olivia Gray on the post-Brexit treatment of design rights

    Olivia Gray

    In the Press

  • Rebecca Steer writes for Artificial Lawyer on GenAI, copyright and the future of innovation

    Rebecca Steer

    In the Press

  • Government received 11,500 responses to AI and Copyright Consultation

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • UK Government’s Consultation on Copyright and AI: What’s Next for AI Developers and Creators?

    Rebecca Steer

    Insights

  • Guide to launching online consumer brands in the UK – 10 essential steps

    Rebecca Steer

    Insights

  • EU Design Legislation Updates

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

  • Mary Bagnall writes for FMCG CEO on the recent Thatchers v Aldi court ruling

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • EU Designs: Upcoming increases in renewal fees and amendments to renewal deadlines

    Quick Reads

  • Mind the Gap Trade Mark

    Insights

  • Navigating the Future: Key trends for Creative and Digital Agencies in 2025

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • Combatting Lookalikes Revisited - clouds lift for brand owners as Thatchers wins its appeal over Aldi copycat cider

    Mary Bagnall

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Mary Bagnall on Aldi’s infringement of Thatchers’ trademark

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • Why Man City took ‘Super “Dry”’ off its Training Kit

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • Cheltenham Cyber Roundtable Insights

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • City AM quotes Mary Bagnall on the Thatchers v Aldi trademark appeal

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • Charlotte Duly writes for The Law Society Gazette on the Skykick Supreme Court decision and takeaways for trade mark owners

    In the Press

  • "AI Battlefields" Conference - Some Highlights

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

Back to top