• news-banner

    Expert Insights

We’re technically married, we just haven’t signed the papers. What’s the difference?

min read

In light of the constantly changing restrictions surrounding public gatherings, it is not uncommon to hear of couples opting to delay their weddings and to cohabit in the interim. Many young couples treat this period as a “trial run” for marriage; some even deciding to forego marriage altogether, believing that officially signing the papers make little difference towards their day-to-day relationship. With the rise of the popular concept of a “common law marriage”, this has contributed to the belief that married and cohabitating partners are entitled to similar rights upon the breakdown of their relationship. This is not the case in Hong Kong.

There is no such thing as a “common law spouse” in Hong Kong. No matter how long the de facto relationship, parties do not have rights to apply for maintenance against the other, or be entitled to any capital sum, or a transfer of property. If the relationship turns sour, parties will be required to seek for relief by way of the general laws of contract or property. For example, if one party contributes towards the purchase price of their former home, but the property is legally held by their partner, they may argue they have a beneficial interest, including but not limited to a resulting trust, towards such property. Of course, this is much less straightforward than applying the safeguards under the regime for married partners.

Unmarried mothers can apply for financial relief on behalf of their children, such as monthly maintenance, lump sum provision and the transfer of property. This amount will only be for a “carer’s allowance”, which is considerably less than what the mother would have been able to apply for had she been married. With respect to unmarried fathers, they will not have the same parental rights as the mother, unless they issue an application to the Court.

Interestingly, parties in a de facto relationship are entitled to apply for injunctive relief in terms of domestic violence. This includes orders such as a non-molestation injunction, ouster injunction or occupation order. If, however, one party dies without a valid will, the rules of intestacy will not grant any division of the deceased’s estate to the other. Instead, the surviving party will be required to issue an application with the court, proving that they were maintained by the deceased prior to their death.

As seen from above, cohabiting parties have little legal protection upon the breakdown of their relationships, despite sharing property based on love and trust. For parties who maintain they do not want to enter into the institution of marriage, it is advised that they enter into a cohabitation agreement to set out the terms they would wish for a court to take into account should their relationship break down. This will avoid any misunderstandings in respect of the parties’ intention when purchasing property. Should parties choose to subsequently enter into marriage, a cohabitation agreement may also be used as a framework for a prenuptial agreement. Choosing to protect your interests, whether married or not, will always be a prudent approach. 

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • From Structure to Substance: Positioning your fund platform for Hong Kong's enhanced tax regimes

    Silvia On

    Events

    min read
  • US Citizens moving to the UK part 8: Key considerations in relation to child arrangements

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Retirement without a pension?

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • US citizens moving to the UK part 7: Will my US prenuptial agreement be binding in England and Wales?

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • China's New Outbound Investment Regulation: Key Changes and What They Mean for Investors

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

    min read
  • Nicola Saccardo speaks to TopLegal on the growth of Charles Russell Speechlys’ Italian practice

    Nicola Saccardo

    In the Press

    min read
  • Sarah Jane Boon answers a Financial Times reader's question on the legal implications of a destination wedding

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

    min read
  • Cristiana Felisi comments on preventing conflict in entrepreneurial families and large estates for We Wealth

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

    min read
  • Living Arrangements in Flux: What Shifting Demographics Mean for the UK Living Sector

    Rebecca Arnold

    Insights

    min read
  • Nicola Saccardo speaks to Spear's on cross-border divorce and succession in Italy

    Nicola Saccardo

    In the Press

    min read
  • Planning roadmap for expats in Switzerland (2026) Part Three

    Sophie Hart

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • US citizens moving to the UK part 5: Healthcare, banking and housing

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys obtains Hadkinson order in relation to proceedings to return a child to her father

    Vanessa Duff

    News

    min read
  • ‘Sharenting’ and consent – UAE ruling on posting photos of children online

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • ‘Don’t Lose Ur Head’…But It Might Lose You Money: Conduct in the No-Fault Divorce Era

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Welfare always prevails? The implications of A & B v C & D [2026] EWHC 972 (Fam) for UK domestic and overseas surrogacy

    Ben Haynes

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Spear's features William Longrigg's views on potential reforms to the UK family court and the reintroduction of Calderbank offers

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • India-UAE BIT 2024: What to Expect When You’re Investing

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • “A Fairer End to Relationships”: First Thoughts on the Government's Landmark Consultation

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top