• news-banner

    Expert Insights

The FCA's PS25/4: Extending Investment Research Payment Optionality to Fund Managers

min read

Introduction

On 9 May 2025, the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published Policy Statement PS25/4, marking a significant step in the evolution of investment research payment structures. Building upon the foundations laid by PS24/9, this latest policy statement changes the way in which UK fund managers may pay for investment research and extends the option for joint payments for investment research and execution services to fund managers, including those managing UCITS and Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs). This move aims to enhance flexibility, promote competition, and address the challenges posed by the unbundling requirements introduced under MiFID II.

The changes are in response to the 2023 UK Investment Research Review, which identified that MiFID II’s unbundling of research and execution costs had reduced research availability and created operational burdens, especially for smaller fund managers.  Previously, the FCA issued CP24/7 and PS 24/9, in which it consulted on and implemented Rules to introduce a joint payment option for MiFID firms.  These Rules extend this joint payment option to UK regulated fund managers.

Background: From MiFID II to PS25/4

The MiFID II directive, implemented in 2018, mandated the separation of payments for research and execution services to enhance transparency and manage conflicts of interest. However, this unbundling led to operational complexities and a decline in research coverage, particularly for small and mid-cap companies.

In response, the UK government commissioned the Investment Research Review (IRR) in 2023, which recommended reintroducing flexibility in payment structures. The FCA's PS24/9, published in July 2024, introduced a joint payment option for MiFID investment firms. PS25/4 now extends this option to fund managers, aligning the regulatory framework across different types of investment firms.

Who Is Affected?

PS25/4 primarily impacts the following.

  • UCITS management companies;
  • Full-scope AIFMs;
  • Small authorised AIFMs; and
  • Residual collective investment scheme operators.

These entities, previously excluded from the joint payment option introduced in PS24/9, are now brought into scope, allowing them to adopt a more streamlined approach to paying for investment research.

Key Features of the Joint Payment Option

Under PS25/4, fund managers can opt to make joint payments for third-party research and execution services, provided they adhere to specific requirements, as follows.

Written Policy

Establish a formal policy outlining the firm's approach to joint payments, including governance, decision-making processes, and controls to ensure research costs are maintained separately from execution costs.

Research Agreements

Enter into agreements with research providers that detail the methodology for calculating and separately identifying research costs within total charges.

Payment Allocation Structure

Implement a structure for allocating payments among research providers, promoting fairness and competition.

Operational Procedures

Develop procedures for administering accounts used to purchase research, including timely reconciliation and regular reporting.

Research Budgets

Set annual research budgets for each fund based on expected needs, independent of trade volumes, to avoid cross-subsidisation between funds.

Periodic Assessment

Assess the value and quality of research periodically, incorporating this into the broader assessment of value under the Collective Investment Schemes Sourcebook (COLL).

Cost Allocation

Ensure fair allocation of research costs among funds, considering the benefits received by each.

Disclosure

Provide appropriate disclosures in fund documents, including the prospectus and annual reports, detailing the approach to joint payments and any changes to research budgets.

Practical Considerations for Fund Managers

Adopting the joint payment option requires careful planning and implementation, with a number of practical consideration for fund managers.

Governance and Compliance

Establish robust governance structures to manage joint payments and ensure compliance with the FCA's requirements.

Client Communication

Communicate transparently with investors about the new payment structures and any potential impacts on fees.

System and Process Updates

Update internal systems and processes to handle budgeting, payment allocations, and reporting.

Training and Education

Train staff on the new policies and procedures to ensure consistent application and understanding.

Disclosure Requirements

Review and update disclosure documents, such as the Key Investor Information Document (KIID), to reflect changes in payment structures.

Next Steps

Fund managers intending to adopt the joint payment option should consider the following.

Review and Update Policies

Develop or revise policies to align with the FCA's requirements.

Engage with Research Providers

Negotiate and formalize agreements detailing cost calculations and service expectations.

Communicate with Clients

Inform clients about the changes, providing clear explanations and addressing any concerns.

Monitor and Evaluate

Regularly assess the effectiveness of the new payment structures and make adjustments as needed.

The FCA plans to monitor the uptake of the joint payment option and may conduct follow-up supervisory work to assess its impact. Firms should stay informed about any further guidance or rule changes that may arise.

Conclusion

The Rules came into force immediately on 9 May 2025, allowing fund managers the freedom to adopt the new payment option from now on. The FCA's PS25/4 policy statement represents a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for fund managers, offering greater flexibility in how they pay for investment research. By carefully implementing the joint payment option and adhering to the outlined requirements, firms can enhance their research capabilities while maintaining compliance and transparency with clients. However, given the strict requirements for using the options, many fund managers may not take up the opportunity.

Our thinking

  • Judgement Under Pressure: The General Counsel and In-House Counsel Role in the Built Environment

    Events

    min read
  • Greenwashing webinar

    Kerry Stares

    Events

    min read
  • HR Breakfast Club: The Employment Rights Act 2025: In Discussion with Matthew Taylor CBE, Chair of the new Fair Work Agency

    Nick Hurley

    Events

    min read
  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 4-6

    Events

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes in Building about the proposed ban on construction retentions

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
  • Kerry Stares is quoted in the ESG edition of Law UK

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Harriet Betteridge comments in Professional Adviser on the six-month countdown to UK pension inheritance tax changes

    Harriet Betteridge

    In the Press

    min read
  • The Global Legal Post quotes Lesley O'Leary on client relationship building in the age of AI

    Lesley O’Leary

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises longstanding client Hearthstone Investments on its acquisition by Sentinel Real Estate

    Edward Robinson

    News

    min read
  • Kurt Rademacher comments in Eprivateclient regarding the possible impact of the US mid-term elections on UHNWIs

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys wins Private Client Law Firm – Ultra-High Net Worth 2026 at eprivateclient Excellence Awards

    Piers Master

    News

    min read
  • The Recognition of UK Grants of Probate in France

    Harriet Betteridge

    Insights

    min read
  • Virtual Currency Regulation: United Arab Emirates

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

    min read
  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • The UK’s Expanded Bereavement Leave Rights

    Emily Chalkley

    Insights

    min read
  • The Silent Majority: Why Britain's Family Businesses Are the Overlooked Engine of AIM and the Main Market

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • My child is engaged – how do I raise the issue of a prenuptial agreement?

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys shortlisted in two categories at Law.com British Legal Awards

    Lesley O’Leary

    News

    min read
  • What could the UK Government's proposed divorce law reforms mean for separating couples?

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes about the Building Safety Levy in Estates Gazette

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top