• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Cryptoasset Staking: The Collective Investment Scheme Crypto Exemption

On 31 January 2025, the new collective investment schemes crypto exemption (CIS Crypto Exemption) is set to take effect. This marks a significant development in the regulation of cryptoasset staking activities in the UK.

Crypto staking is the process by which blockchain networks validate transactions, whereby cryptocurrency owners lock up their holdings in the network to support that network’s operations. In return, they will earn rewards, typically in the form of further cryptocurrency. There has been uncertainty for many years as to whether certain staking arrangements constitute regulated activities falling within the UK’s regulatory perimeter. This has generated concern regarding firms’ ability to provide staking services freely and without breaching regulatory requirements.

Crucially, the CIS Crypto Exemption clarifies that specific staking services are not considered collective investment schemes (CISs), and therefore fall outside the scope of the relevant regulations, fostering clarity and confidence among stakeholders engaging in cryptoasset staking.

Understanding the CIS Crypto Exemption

On 8 January 2025, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Collective Investment Schemes) Amendment) Order 2025 (SI 2025/17) was made, introducing a new paragraph 22 to the Schedule of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Collective Investment Schemes) Order 2001 (SI 2001/1062) (CIS Order). This new paragraph will clarify that those arrangements involving "qualifying cryptoasset staking" will be excluded from the definition of a collective investment scheme (CIS) under section 235 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA).

The term "qualifying cryptoasset staking" refers to the use of qualifying cryptoassets in blockchain validation or distributed ledger technology (DLT) based networks, as defined by existing UK financial promotions (FinProm) rules set out in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) (Amendment) Order 2023).

This exclusion applies to arrangements such as pooling cryptoassets to meet minimum staking requirements, ensuring that such activities do not inadvertently fall within the regulatory scope of CISs.

The exemption is a welcome clarification from the UK Government that the regulations governing the creation, management, and dissolution of CIS were not intended for cryptoasset staking. It is a recognition also of the UK Government’s stance that applying these regulations to the contrary would significantly impede the effective operation of blockchain and staking arrangements in the UK.

Collective Investment Schemes

A CIS, as defined under section 235 of FSMA, refers to any arrangement concerning property of any description, including money. The primary purpose or effect of such arrangements is to enable those participants to participate in or receive profits or income arising from the acquisition, holding, management, or disposal of the property or sums paid out of such profits or income.

In many CISs, investors pool their assets to benefit from diversification and professional management across various asset classes, such as stocks, bonds, or real estate.

Regulatory Framework for CIS in the UK

The regulation of CISs is primarily governed by FSMA and overseen by the UK’s financial regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

Fund managers and trustees operating CISs generally require FCA authorisation and must follow the FCA’s Collective Investment Schemes Sourcebook (COLL). These rules govern areas such as investment and borrowing powers, valuation and pricing, and disclosure requirements, ensuring that CIS activities adhere to legal standards designed to protect investors and maintain market integrity. As highlighted above, the CIS Order identifies specific types of arrangement that are excluded from being classified as CIS.

Understanding the legal definition and regulatory framework of CIS is crucial for investors and financial professionals, as it determines the scope of applicable regulatory obligations, oversight, and investor protections.

Implications for Cryptoasset Service Providers

As can be seen, being a CIS involves significant regulatory burdens, and firms will therefore welcome this new legislative development.

In particular, the CIS Crypto Exemption has several key implications for cryptoasset service providers:

Regulatory Clarity

By explicitly excluding qualifying cryptoasset staking from the definition of a CIS, the amendment provides much-needed clarity. Service providers can now operate staking services with a clearer understanding of their regulatory obligations, reducing the risk of non-compliance due to ambiguous classifications.

Operational Flexibility

With staking activities excluded from the CIS framework, providers may experience increased operational flexibility. This could facilitate the development and offering of staking services without the need to adhere to the stringent requirements associated with CISs.

Consumer Confidence

Clear regulatory guidelines can enhance consumer confidence in cryptoasset staking services. Investors are more likely to engage with services that operate within a well-defined legal framework, potentially leading to increased participation in staking activities.

Considerations for Compliance

While the CIS Crypto Exemption offers clarity, service providers should remain vigilant; this includes giving due consideration to:

Assess Eligibility

Determine whether their staking arrangements qualify under the new CIS Crypto Exemption. This may necessitate legal consultation to ensure compliance with the specific criteria outlined in the amendment.

Monitor Regulatory Developments

Stay informed about any further regulatory changes or guidance related to cryptoassets to ensure ongoing compliance and to adapt to the evolving legal landscape.

Implement Best Practices

Maintain robust operational and compliance procedures to align with broader financial regulations, thereby safeguarding against potential legal or reputational risks.

A Step Forward

The CIS Crypto Exemption represents a welcome development for cryptoasset service providers involved in staking activities, offering clearer regulatory guidance and the potential for enhanced operational freedom within the UK's financial regulatory framework. While this amendment provides certainty for staking arrangements, firms must nonetheless remain vigilant about other regulatory obligations, including FinProm rules for cryptoassets.

If you are a cryptoasset service provider and you are unsure how the new exemption applies to you, or would otherwise like to assess your regulatory obligations, please get in touch with our Financial Services & Funds team.

Our thinking

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Resilience in Entrepreneurship

    Events

  • FT Adviser reports on our Gen Z survey and quotes William Marriott and Sally Ashford on the financial behaviours of this cohort

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • Building Liability Orders: New Guidance from the Courts

    Melanie Hardingham

    Insights

  • Arbitrating shareholders’ disputes

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • The Wealth Net profiles Sarah Rowley, Head of Charities and Philanthropy

    Sarah Rowley

    In the Press

  • William Marriott and Sophie Clark write for EG Magazine on structuring the bank of mum and dad and family trusts

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • Modernising Business Tenancies: Should the redevelopment ground be altered?

    Andrew Ross

    Insights

  • Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of ‘A Taxpayer v HMRC’

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • BBC Radio 5 Live and The Telegraph interview Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Property Week quotes Georgina Muskett on the future implications of a high-profile court judgment relating to a £32.5m moth-infested mansion

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Claire Fallows on the government's new Planning and Infrastructure Bill

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Cohabitation law reform

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Property Patter - Lifetime achievements: Katie Kopec of JLL

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • PBC Today quotes Mark White on Manchester United's plans to build a new football stadium worth £2 billion

    Mark White

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

Back to top