• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Consumer Duty Board Report

The 31 July 2024 deadline for firms to prepare and approve their first Consumer Duty board reports is fast approaching. Firms which are subject to the Consumer Duty but which have yet to complete this process should turn their attention to it now.

What is consumer duty?

The Consumer Duty is a flagship initiative for the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Introduced on 31 July 2023 and set out in Principle 12, the Consumer Duty requires firms to “act to deliver good outcomes for retail customers”. The FCA has been clear that the Consumer Duty does not simply restate rules that existed before; the Consumer Duty sets higher standards than those which previously applied. The FCA wants firms to up their game.

The FCA has been clear that this is not a “once and done” exercise. The Consumer Duty should be an ongoing process that leads to continuous improvement.

Consumer duty board report content

A firm to which the Consumer Duty applies must prepare a report (Report) for its “governing body” (usually its board of directors) on the outcomes being received by retail customers. The Report must set out:

  • the results of the firm’s Consumer Duty monitoring programme; and
  • details of actions that are required as a result of this monitoring.

At least annually, the firm’s board must:

  • review and approve a detailed assessment of the outcomes being received by retail customers (which should be set out in the Report);
  • confirm whether it is satisfied that the firm is complying with its obligations under the Consumer Duty (and related FCA rules and guidance); and
  • assess whether the firm’s future business strategy is consistent with its obligations under the Consumer Duty (and related FCA rules and guidance).

When it approves the Report, the board must also agree:

  • the details of any actions that must to carried out to address any identified matter that might lead to retail customers not receiving good outcomes;
  • any steps that must be taken to address identified instances of retail customers not having received good outcomes; and
  • any amendments to the firm’s business strategy that are required to ensure that this strategy remains consistent with the firm’s obligations under the Consumer Duty (and the related FCA rules and guidance). 

Consumer duty board report format

The FCA has not prescribed the format in which the Report should be set out. Rather the FCA considers that firms themselves are best-placed to decide how to communicate the necessary information to their boards.

The FCA has recognised that the level of detail and complexity that may be expected of a Report will vary from firm to firm. In light of this, the FCA has published guidance stating that the requirement to produce the Report is intended to apply “proportionately”. Firms may therefore wish to take advice as to how best to present the information in their particular case.

Questions to consider

The FCA has provided examples of the type of questions that firms can expect the FCA to ask regarding governance arrangements in respect of the Consumer Duty.  The FCA says that questions such as these should guide the way in which the board discusses the Consumer Duty. The FCA has grouped these questions under two headings: (1) “Culture and Governance” and (2) “Customer outcomes”. We set out a selection of the relevant questions below.

Culture and Governance

  • “How does the organisation’s culture support the delivery of good outcomes for customers?”
  • “How does the organisation ensure that individuals throughout the organisation – including those in control and support functions – understand their role in delivering the Consumer Duty?”
  • “Is the Consumer Duty being considered in all relevant discussions such as strategy and remuneration? Are customers outcomes a key lens for Risk and Internal Audit?”

Customer outcomes

  • “Has the firm identified the key risks to its ability to deliver good outcomes to customers and put appropriate mitigants in place?”
  • “What data does the firm have about its customers and how they use its products? Are there any gaps in the data? What steps is the firm taking to address them?”
  • “Are certain groups of consumers getting different outcomes, and if so why?” 

Broader context

As indicated above, part of the Report’s function is to set out the results of the firm’s Consumer Duty monitoring programme. Given this, the Report cannot be seen in isolation. Rather, the Report should be a result of a monitoring process that is already underway. Firms may wish to use the process of preparing the Report as a way of assessing the effectiveness of their monitoring programmes.

Next steps

Firms which are subject to the Consumer Duty but which have yet to finalise their Reports should prioritise this exercise now.

If you would like advice regarding the structure and/or content of the report then please contact Richard Ellis or William Garner.

Our expertise

We provide financial services regulatory advice to a wide range of businesses. Our client list includes: commercial banks, non-bank lenders, investment funds, private funds, investment managers, family offices, advisers, intermediaries, insurance companies, wholesale trading firms and markets entities.

In addition to advising on regulatory issues we can also assist with the regulatory elements of  transactional, contentious and strategic matters.

Our thinking

  • An introduction to the new Procurement Act 2023

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Mind the Gap Trade Mark

    Charlotte Duly

    Insights

  • A Closer Look at the Meaning of ‘Investor’ in Investment Treaty Arbitration

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Rivals: Filming Locations and Considerations for Landed Estates

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to unfair prejudice petitions

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

  • Beyond Dry January: The Rise of the Low and Non-Alcoholic Beverage Sector

    Iwan Thomas

    Insights

  • New food and drink ads regulation & impact on live sports broadcasts

    Sarah Johnson

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts Hard Conversations and Smart Conflict®, a Women in Leadership event

    Sarah Wigington

    News

  • AML in decentralized finance and traditional finance

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Sangna Chauhan on the impact of the abolition of UK non-dom status on her workload

    Sangna Chauhan

    In the Press

  • Up in the AI: Gen AI & looking forwards, and backwards

    Joe Cohen

    Podcasts

  • International Arbitration: 2024 in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Growth Partners on its lead investment as part of a $4.3 million funding round for finance-focused legal AI specialist, Semeris

    David Coates

    News

  • Building Safety: What’s in store for 2025?

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Claire Fallows on planning law reform

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • Budget 2024 and its impact on IHT and estates

    Harriet Betteridge

    Podcasts

  • Corporate deal round-up H2 2024

    David Coates

    Insights

  • Joe Cohen features in The Lawyer’s ‘Hot 100’ list for 2024-25

    Joe Cohen

    News

  • Appointment of company directors – who can do it and how?

    Stephen Burns

    Insights

  • A Digital Pound: The Bank of England January 2025 Update

    Racheal Muldoon

    Insights

Back to top