• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Luxembourg Client Briefing: Update of AED’s AML guidance

min read

1. Executive summary

Luxembourg investment funds are subject to the law of 12 November 2004 on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing as amended (the AML Law). Accordingly, they must have an appropriate internal organisation to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing, inter alia a responsible for compliance with the professional obligations (RR) and a responsible for the control of the compliance with the obligations (RC)[1].

The supervision of compliance with the AML Law is entrusted to the Comission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) for regulated investment funds and Luxembourg investment fund managers. The Administration de l’enregistrement, des domaines et de la TVA (AED) is responsible for supervising alternative investment funds (AIFs) that are not supervised by any other authortity under the AML Law (Unregulated AIFs).

After its guidance for RAIFs that has already been available for some time[2], AED has recently published two FAQs that apply to other Unregulated AIFs (Other Unregulated AIFs). The AED emphasises therein that all Unregulated AIFs must identify the RR and the RC to the AED by providing dedicated forms and evidence of the appointment of RR and RC. This is required even if the alternative investment fund manager, general partner or another stakeholder related to the Unregulated AIF is already supervised by a different Luxembourg authority under the AML Law.

2. More about the AED FAQs

The AED has recently issued two FAQs, addressed to Other Unregulated AIFS notably “FAQ – Persons involved in AML/CFT for a Luxembourg Alternative Ivnestment Fund (“AIF”) supervised by the AED for AML/CFT purposes”[3] (FAQ 1) and “FAQ – Clarifications regarding to a Luxembourg Alternative Investment Fund (“AIF”) supervised by the AED for AML/CFT purposes”[4] (FAQ 2).

FAQ 1 explains the concepts of RR and RC and the qualification required from RR and RC. The RC is to be considered as the main contact for the AED.

FAQ 1 explains that the RC may be either a member of the AIF’s governing body or a third party RC. The appointment of a third party RC must be made based on an agreement with the RC or with his/her employer. In the latter case, the agreement must state the name of the RC and foresee that the RC may not be replaced without consent of the AIF.

Where the Other Unregulated AIF has appointed a foreign AIFM, the RC may be a staff member of that foreign AIFM. FAQ 2 is essentially identical with the FAQ published earlier in relation to RAIFs[5]. The practice of the AED is thus quite similar to the practice of the CSSF for regulated investment funds.

FAQ 2 mentions that the AED has sent letters to some AIFs in which it asks these Unregulated AIFs to submit a RR_RC identification form together with supporting documentation about the appointment of RR and RC (board minutes or circular resolution) and the “AIF AML/CFT Questionnaire 2021”. FAQ 2 announces that the AED will send these letters also to Unregulated AIFs that have not received them. However, these Unregulated AIFs may already prepare and submit the documents mentioned above before being asked to do so by the AED.

[1] The AML Law imposes on investment funds essentially three obligations in its articles 3 to 5: 1) Customer Due Diligence (Obligation de vigilance, i.e. identification of the client, identification of the beneficial owner, to have a prodcedure for entering a new business relationship, record keeping & ongoing monitoring) articles 3, 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 of the AML Law, 2) the obligation to have a an appropriate internal organisation (internal procedures, appointment of RR/RC, training of employees, risk analysis) and 3) the obligation to cooperate with the authorities.

[2] Reserved alternative investment funds according to the law of 23 July 2016 on reserved alternative investment funds.

[3] https://pfi.public.lu/content/dam/pfi/pdf/blanchiment/questionnaire-et-formulaires/questionnaire-vehicules-financiers-non-reglementes/rr-rc-identification-form/faq-aif-rr-rc.pdf

[4] https://pfi.public.lu/content/dam/pfi/pdf/blanchiment/questionnaire-et-formulaires/questionnaire-vehicules-financiers-non-reglementes/rr-rc-identification-form/faq-clarifications-aif.pdf

[5] https://pfi.public.lu/content/dam/pfi/pdf/blanchiment/questionnaire-et-formulaires/questionnaire-vehicules-financiers-non-reglementes/rr-rc-identification-form/FAQ-RR-RC-AED-Version-EN.pdf

 

Our thinking

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises longstanding client Hearthstone Investments on its acquisition by Sentinel Real Estate

    Edward Robinson

    News

    min read
  • The Recognition of UK Grants of Probate in France

    Harriet Betteridge

    Insights

    min read
  • Virtual Currency Regulation: United Arab Emirates

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

    min read
  • Vadim Romanoff and Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake consider the risks and rewards of digital assets for family offices in eprivateclient

    Vadim Romanoff

    In the Press

    min read
  • Paul Arathoon comments in The Banker, Finextra and others about Revolut’s mooted dual listing in the UK and US

    Paul Arathoon

    In the Press

    min read
  • Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake and Mike Barrington write in Finextra about regulatory themes every FCA-authorised fintech leader should be watching

    Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Bloomberg quotes Gaven Cheong on proposed Hong Kong tax exemptions on carried interest

    Gaven Cheong

    In the Press

    min read
  • Family Offices want crypto – but who's helping them get there?

    Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Technology, AI and US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
  • What July 2026’s Bank of England decision means for private capital stakeholders

    Philip Withey

    Insights

    min read
  • European Supervisory Authorities publish first Joint Report on Major ICT incidents under DORA: Key lessons and practical recommendations for ICT contracting

    Courtney Benard

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Default interest in loan agreements: The Court of Appeal provides further guidance

    James Walton

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys reports strong firmwide revenue growth, with 10% increase to £266.5m

    Simon Ridpath

    News

    min read
  • What Moneybox Tells Us About Price Discovery on PISCES

    Greg Stonefield

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Health is the New Growth Market in European F&B M&A

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys celebrates year-on-year recognition in Chambers High Net Worth Guide 2026

    Piers Master

    News

    min read
Back to top