• news-banner

    Expert Insights

What will the SMCR mean for partnerships and overseas individuals?

min read

The 9 December deadline for the implementation of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR) is looming and firms are busily preparing to ensure that they are ready. FCA solo-regulated firms, as well as EEA and third-country branches, will become subject to the SMCR, which will replace the current FCA Approved Persons Regime (APR).

The SMCR aims to reduce harm to consumers, strengthen market integrity and highlight individual accountability. The FCA has identified three categories of firms: Limited, Core and Enhanced. This article focuses on core firms and in particular how the regime applies to partnerships and individuals based overseas.

Partnerships

For partnerships, the FCA envisages that most if not all partners or members will be senior managers, but this will depend on the constitution of the partnership or LLP. If a partner is not involved with the management of the partnership firm, they may not be categorised as senior managers under the SMCR. Such partners may include: corporate partners and limited partners that are not involved in managerial decisions, junior partners with no senior management responsibility, or silent partners.

Partnerships should investigate the role of each partner on a case-by-case basis, and decide whether the individual is in fact performing a Senior Management Function (SMF) and therefore whether they need to be appointed to the SMF27 (Partner) function.

When a partner is not undertaking a management role, the firm will need to actively notify the FCA via Form C of the withdrawal of this partner from the relevant APR Controlled Function (CF4). Otherwise, the FCA will automatically map the partner to the corresponding SMF27 function.

Where a partner performs an SMF, their responsibilities will need to be clearly set out in their Statement of Responsibility. The FCA has set out that prescribed responsibilities should not be divided or shared between partners unless there is a strong justification for this. If certain responsibilities must be shared in a firm, this should be explained in each partner’s Statement of Responsibility.
Partnerships should be aware that the Certification Regime only applies to employees. If a partner does not hold an SMF and is not an employee (which can also cover secondees and contractors), the Certification Regime will not apply.

It may be the case that certain members of an LLP are not senior enough to be categorised as SMF27 partners, but are also not “employees” under the Certification Regime. Firms should be mindful of the tax implications of this, and consider whether these types of partner still qualify to be taxed as a partner.

Overseas individuals

The Senior Managers Regime applies to anyone who undertakes an SMF for a firm in the scope of the regime, not only in the UK but anywhere in the world. For core firms, any individual performing the following functions overseas will be caught by the regime: SMF1 (Chief Executive), SMF3 (Executive Director), SMF27 (Partner), SMF9 (Chair), SMF16 (Compliance Oversight) and SMF17 (MLRO).

The Certification Regime applies to all overseas employees carrying out Certified Functions who are dealing with UK clients. However, if the individual is deemed a ‘material risk taker’, the Certification Regime will apply even if the individual is based overseas and does not deal with UK clients.

The SMCR also applies to certain persons based in the UK branch of an overseas firm. The SMCR does not apply to an overseas firm without a UK branch even if a person working for the firm deals with a UK customer.

Next steps

Firms constituted as partnerships or firms with overseas individuals should:

  • Review the territorial reach of the SMCR and the influence that individuals based overseas may have over UK entities. This may require amendments to their global employee handbooks, policies and compliance manuals to meet the relevant requirements
  • Assess the role of each partner (if the firm is a partnership), and decide whether the individual is performing an SMF
  • Clearly set out in each Statement of Responsibility the allocation of the individual’s prescribed responsibilities and the extent of their influence over the firm
  • Ensure that your firm’s current APR Control Functions are correct as these will be automatically mapped to the corresponding SMFs by the FCA.

The article was originally posted to the IQ-EQ website on 3 September 2019.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • CasinoBeats quotes Darren Bailey on player betting bans and sports gambling partnerships

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • William Longrigg writes in the Law Society Gazette on the potential return of Calderbank offers in family proceedings

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Bloomberg quotes Gaven Cheong on proposed Hong Kong tax exemptions on carried interest

    Gaven Cheong

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top