• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Unknown future claims cannot be settled

The EAT has confirmed in Bathgate v Technip that provisions in the Equality Act 2010 mean that unknown future claims cannot be compromised in a settlement agreement. 

In January 2017, Mr Bathgate entered into a voluntary redundancy agreement which provided for enhanced redundancy, notice payments and an additional pension payment to be calculated by reference to a maritime collective agreement.  He signed a settlement agreement in full and final settlement of claims.  The agreement included a list of claims including age discrimination and a general waiver of all claims: past, present or future.   Three months later his employer concluded that under the terms of the collective agreement, as he was over 61 at time of dismissal, he was not entitled to the pension payment.  He was informed of this in June 2017, six months after he had signed his settlement agreement.  He brought a claim of age discrimination and his employer argued that he was precluded from bringing this claim because of the terms of the settlement agreement. 

The EAT held that to validly settle a claim under the Equality Act it must relate to the “particular complaint” which had to be identified in the agreement either by a generic description or by reference to the statutory provision giving rise to the claim.  However, a “particular complaint” did not include a complaint that may or may not occur at some point in the future.  In reaching this decision, the EAT took into account case law and an excerpt from Hansard which showed that the equivalent provision in the Employment Rights Act 1996 was intended only to be available in the context of a complaint that had already arisen. There was a public policy concern about the employer’s construction that future claims could be covered which would allow employees to sign away their rights without a proper understanding of what they were doing.  To decide otherwise would mean that Mr Bathgate had signed away his right to sue for age discrimination before he knew whether he had a claim. 

Practical considerations

This decision shows the importance of ensuring that the “particular complaint” is identified in any settlement agreement and confirms that it is not possible to settle future claims that are unknown at the time of signing whatever wording is included.

Employers should also ensure that the quantum of any compensation paid to the employee reflects the nature of the particular complaint(s) only, given that only the particular complaint(s) are being settled.

Our thinking

  • PISCES – HMRC release technical note on the interaction of PISCES on share schemes and incentives

    Tim Edgar

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client Puma Growth Partners on its investment in LOVE CORN

    Ashwin Pillay

    News

  • New Government guidance for businesses on section 54 statements under the Modern Slavery Act

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Nick Hurley and Erin Hughes write for Personnel Today on two recent constructive dismissal tribunal cases

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • HR Magazine quotes Dan Pollard on a successful constructive dismissal claim involving a gender-critical scientist

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • The Times quotes Nick Hurley on new powers afforded to the FWA under the Employment Rights Bill

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • The Times and Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on new changes to the Employment Rights Bill

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • Mahmood v Standard Chartered Bank – A landmark decision in discrimination and victimisation but what does it mean for discrimination claims in the DIFC?

    Nick Hurley

    Insights

  • HR Magazine quotes Lucy Lintott on employees who are unable to work due to poor health or disability

    Lucy Lintott

    In the Press

  • Briony Richards writes for People Management on navigating pre-termination negotiations

    Briony Richards

    In the Press

  • Food safety, restrictions on unhealthy foods, employee rights and preventing economic crime: Trends to look out for in the Food & Beverage Sector 2025

    Jamie Cartwright

    Insights

  • Employment Law Briefing: Labour’s Employment Rights Bill

    Nick Hurley

    Insights

  • Abu Dhabi Global Market introduces new employment regulations in the financial free zone

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Updated HMRC guidance following Vermilion Holdings: when is a securities option “employment-related”?

    Tessa Newman

    Insights

  • Nick Hurley and Amelia McRae write for Law360 on preventing harassment at office holiday parties and beyond

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • Computer says No - my prediction of UK border chaos on Wednesday 1 January 2025

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • UK Labour Government + Immigration policy = More Quangos. UK business should follow the math and plan for 2030

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Neurodiversity and the Law: Creating a Supportive Work Environment

    Briony Richards

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Advises SAFE Group on Successful Restructuring

    Dimitri A. Sonier

    News

  • Autumn Budget 2024: Share incentives

    Tessa Newman

    Quick Reads

Back to top