• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Covid-19 Vaccination – can an employer make it compulsory for employees?

Whether an employer can (or should) make it mandatory for employees to have the Covid-19 vaccine is far from straightforward. There are many factors to consider alongside the legal points highlighted below.

At the time of writing, there has been no formal guidance for employers issued by the Government or the Health and Safety Executive regarding compulsory vaccination. It is still early days, but if an employer is considering whether to make vaccination compulsory, it will need to take into account and be aware of the legal issues outlined below.

Health and safety

Employers have legal obligations to take reasonable care and reasonable steps to ensure the safety of their employees at work, and to provide a safe place and system of work. This includes safety in respect of Covid-19.

Unfair dismissal

Dismissals for refusing to be vaccinated may result in unfair dismissal claims. 

Whistleblowing

Where an employee has brought concerns about certain health and safety matters to the attention of the employer, that employee may be protected from detriment or dismissal under whistleblower protection legislation.

Discrimination

There are a number of potential issues under anti-discrimination legislation where a policy requiring mandatory vaccination is introduced and/or employees are dismissed or subjected to any other detriment for refusing to be vaccinated, or not being vaccinated.

Religion or belief: Surveys have shown that a significant proportion of the population are not intending to take up the vaccine and therefore one issue is whether the “anti-vaxxer” beliefs of those opposed to vaccination are protected as being a philosophical belief. They would need to demonstrate that their beliefs are genuinely held, concern a weighty and substantial aspect of human life, are cogent, worthy of respect in a democratic society and are not in conflict with the fundamental rights of others.  

Employees may have religion or belief-based grounds for refusal, for example, if the vaccine is made from animal products, or where a vaccine’s development has involved animal products or testing.  

Disability: If an employee has a disability which makes it difficult or dangerous for them to be vaccinated, then the implementation of a vaccination policy could give rise to a claim of disability discrimination.  

Sex, pregnancy and maternity: Pregnant employees and those who have recently given birth are another category who may be concerned about vaccination. There are therefore potential sex, pregnancy and maternity discrimination issues to consider.

Age: Younger employees may have more difficultly accessing the vaccine if they are deemed to be a lower risk group. Therefore, in some circumstances, a mandatory vaccination requirement could amount to discrimination on grounds of age. 

Race: Similarly, if ethnicity is a risk factor and the vaccine is more readily available to certain groups on that basis, race discrimination is also a potential issue.

It may be preferable for employers to take other steps to protect the workforce that are effective, less contentious and less likely to damage employee relations. This could include facilitating and encouraging vaccination, and continuing and developing existing ‘Covid-safe’ measures or perhaps extending home working arrangements.

Other issues:

Reputational harm: The issue of mandatory vaccination can be controversial. Employers should not ignore the potential reputational harm which could arise from making vaccination mandatory and should consult over its approach to seek to explain the underlying reasons and seek consensus. Adopting a mandatory vaccination policy may also affect recruitment and staff retention, depending on how the policy compares with other employers and how public opinion develops in this area. 

Data protection: Information about an individual’s vaccination status will be sensitive personal data, which has strict protection under data protection laws. It will need to be processed and stored particularly carefully. 

Conclusion

Until the entire population has had the opportunity to be vaccinated and there is proper clarity on the effectiveness of the vaccine, vaccination alone is unlikely to be sufficient to control the risk posed by Covid-19 in the workplace. Other Covid-secure safety measures will still be required in the immediate future in order to prevent transmission, avoid outbreaks and to comply with the duty to provide a safe place of work. 

Given the evolving situation, whilst it is not too early for employers to be planning and assessing the impact which the availability of a vaccine will have on workplaces, implementing mandatory vaccination requirements for employees and applicants remains an untested and potentially risky strategy from an employment law perspective.

The situation is not static and employers should keep themselves informed and up to date with the latest advice and guidance to decide what is the most effective and appropriate way to protect their employees and those coming into contact with them.

This article was written by Anne-Marie Balfour and Anisha Vyas. For more information, please contact Anne-Marie on +44 (0)20 7427 6627 or at anne-marie.balfour@crsblaw.com.

Our thinking

  • Mental Health Management

    Nick Hurley

    Events

  • Is the opening up of Nexity's services division capital a consequence of the difficulties facing the French property sector?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Arbitration Act 1996: Law Commission recommends limited changes

    Richard Kiddell

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Nortal on its acquisition of Questers

    Hamish Perry

    News

  • Family and Employment law assistance in legal advice deserts

    Sarah Farrelly

    News

  • Property Patter: the latest on the Building Safety Act

    Richard Flenley

    Podcasts

  • James Souter writes for City AM on Meta pulling out of its London office

    James Souter

    In the Press

  • A Labour government: what might be in store for personal taxation?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Ciara Coyle writes for People Management on ways to ensure ‘invisible’ workers do not go unrecognised

    Ciara Coyle

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Private Equity on its £3.5 million investment into TravelLocal

    David Coates

    News

  • Georgina Muskett and Karin Mouhon write for Property Week on the importance of preparation when proposing site redevelopments

    Karin Mouhon

    In the Press

  • The Evening Standard quotes Rose Carey on the increase in visa fees

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Spears quotes Piers Master on the potential exodus of UHNW non-doms from the UK ahead of a potential Labour government

    Piers Master

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Zenzero’s management team on its majority acquisition by Macquarie Capital

    Mark Howard

    News

  • David Savage writes for Construction News on the upcoming building-control overhaul

    David Savage

    In the Press

  • Updates and points to note in relation to buy-to-let residential properties

    Twiggy Ho

    Insights

  • Felicity Chapman writes for Insider Media on alternatives to court for divorcing business owners

    Felicity Chapman

    In the Press

  • Investment Week quotes Julia Cox on the proposed scrapping of inheritance tax

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands commercial offering with the appointment of Rebecca Steer

    Rebecca Steer

    News

  • The Times quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s preliminary approval of the Activision Blizzard-Microsoft deal

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Heritage property and conditional exemption

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • Property Week quotes Cara Imbrailo on Rishi Sunak scrapping MEES requirements for residential landlords

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Georgina Muskett

    Quick Reads

  • New Governance Guidelines for family-owned businesses in the UAE

    William Reichert

    Quick Reads

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Will the downturn in the Paris region property market lead property companies to turn to ad hoc proceedings, as they did in the 1990s?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Making BitCoin a BitClearer

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Key figures gather to discuss the future of Gloucestershire

    Jonathan Morley

    Quick Reads

  • UK CMA's blocks Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard, a potentially significant decision for SMEs in the video gaming sector

    Rebecca Burford

    Quick Reads

  • Key takeaways from the UK Government's "Green Day"

    Martha Glaser

    Quick Reads

  • From Holby City to 5 Fleet Place - David Ames shares his experience of "Behind the Lens" with CRS

    Quick Reads

  • The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 in Action

    Sophia Leeder

    Quick Reads

  • Number crunching times

    Emma Humphreys

    Quick Reads

  • This week in the news: inheritance tax interest costs rising due to Probate delays

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • WhatsAppGate - Should businesses be reviewing their social media policies?

    Anna Rogers

    Quick Reads

Back to top