• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Through the Looking-Glass: Is the Government's Vision for Farming Coming into Focus?

min read

The Government was expected to respond to the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee's report, "The Government’s Vision for Farming," by 16 July 2025. At the time of writing, the response is overdue, leaving the agricultural sector in anticipation. While we wait, Field Notes explores whether the vision is becoming clearer and what we hope to see included.

Background

Since the last election, the agricultural sector has been plagued by rushed policy announcements and poor communication. The abrupt closure of the SFI application window and intended APR and BPR reforms have sparked concern. The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee criticised the Government's chaotic handling of agricultural policy in its 16 May report, urging a pause for consultation and clearer communication, particularly on APR/BPR reforms, to rebuild trust and clarify the future of SFI and ELMS.

Developments Since May

  • On 11 June, the Chancellor's Spending Review statement omitted any mention of Defra, farming, rural communities or the environment.  The accompanying policy paper contained a headline ELMS funding would increase (from £800 million to £2 billion by 2028-29), but indicated that the uplift would be funded by cutting payments deemed to provide a poor return on investment but with no clarity on how that would be judged and no consultation guarantees.
  • Defra's 16 June blog post admitted that "change takes time and certainty matters," yet failed to reconcile this with the rapid reduction in payments. Delinked payments will drop from £330 million in 2025 to £20 million next year, capped at £600 per business.
  • Clarity on APR/BPR remains elusive, with disappointing engagement with calls for more consultation. This missed opportunity to rebuild trust has left farmers facing further uncertainty due to government action.
  • Some direct community engagement has been seen, such as the Secretary of State's attendance at Groundswell on 3 July.
  • On 15 July, the Government released a food strategy for England, prioritising environmental sustainability, resilience, and food security.

While the Chancellor's statement and Defra's blog posts missed chances to mend bridges with the farming community, event attendance and the food strategy release may signal the start of more constructive engagement.

What Do We Expect from the Government's Vision for Farming?

We anticipate the Government's vision will include a commitment to regenerative agriculture, aiming for measurable food security and environmental improvements, with a focus on agricultural profitability. This vision must be supported by appropriate funding schemes and strategies to ensure land remains in agricultural production, considering the wider implications and risks associated with the APR/BPR reforms. Details on strategies for supporting agricultural production and profitability would be welcomed.

What Details Are Needed?

Clarity on funding, especially regarding SFI plans (level, limits, coverage, reopening date), ELMS details (amount, incentives, application process, timeframes), and expected returns for the increased ELMS funding. Information on APR/BPR reforms – both in terms of the timeline and any consultation plans is crucial. Transparency, including publication of any impact calculations and improved communication, is essential.

What Measurable Outcomes Would Support the Vision?

Expected measurable outcomes include increased national food self-sufficiency from 62%, aligning with the food strategy's vision of a thriving UK food sector and improved supply chain resilience. In the context of household-level food security, we hope to see urgent priority given to reversing the 2% decline in the number of food-secure households that took place between 2020 and 2023. We expect to see reversal of the decline in natural capital, measurable through biodiversity indicators, included as a priority outcome.

What Next?

The Government's vision is gradually coming into focus. We will continue to monitor and report as developments unfold, and as we hope for a formal response sooner rather than later. 

Field Notes is Charles Russell Speechlys’ weekly agricultural law blog, sharing plain-English insight into the legal and policy issues affecting agriculture, agricultural land and rural business life. From hints and tips on avoiding agricultural disputes, pitfalls to keep an eye out when planning for tenancy or family agri-business succession, to the latest agricultural legislative changes and the most interesting farm-related court decisions, Field Notes makes the complex more understandable, always grounded in the realities of life on (and off) the land. 

Last week’s edition of Field Notes can be found here.

Subscribe

If you would like to receive more news and content from our agricultural disputes team, please subscribe below.

Subscribe

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Andrew Ross contributes to a legal Q&A in Estates Gazette on nuisance claims

    Andrew Ross

    In the Press

    min read
  • Farmers Weekly quotes Sadie Pitman on planning system reforms

    Sadie Pitman

    In the Press

    min read
  • Tamasin Perkins writes in IFA Magazine about the limits of “challenge-proof” wills

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

    min read
  • Caroline Greenwell comments in Global Investigations Review on Jonathan Fisher KC's report, Fraud in the Digital Age, and its recommendations for tackling fraud in the UK

    Caroline Greenwell

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Myriad Group, owners of Caring Homes, on its acquisition of Parklands Care Homes, a Scottish care home provider

    Martin Wright

    News

    min read
  • Can I move abroad with my child after separation?

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys’ Landed Estates, Heritage & Agriculture team report from the 167th Great Yorkshire Show

    Katie Talbot

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Adverse Possession and Leasehold Land

    Helena Cullwick

    Insights

    min read
  • Swiss executors dealing with UK assets – what do I do? Part two

    Sophie Hart

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Costs, Conduct & Counter-Offers – Key Takeaways from the Bankside rights of light costs decision

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

    min read
  • Update: Objectivity in section 172 Companies Act 2006: Re-examining the Current Position after Saxon Woods Investments Ltd v Costa

    Andrew Collins

    Insights

    min read
  • 9fin quotes Jamie Rhodes and Tom Smitham on the growing role of private capital in football finance

    Jamie Rhodes

    In the Press

    min read
  • The National Security and Investment Act, Five Years On: What the 2025-26 Annual Report Tells Foreign Buyers

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Jersey Trade Mark Reform: What the New Regime Means for You

    Dewdney William Drew

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Telegraph quotes Julia Cox on the growing use of Family Investment Companies for inheritance planning

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

    min read
  • Tessa Bartley comments in Legal Futures about our framework for choosing the right legal AI tools

    Tessa Bartley

    In the Press

    min read
  • Investors’ Chronicle quotes Katie Talbot on the risks and responsibilities of undertaking a trustee position

    Katie Talbot

    In the Press

    min read
  • Chiara Muston comments in Employee Benefits on minimum wage enforcement changes

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

    min read
  • Retail Collection: Reputation management for brand founders

    Claudine Morgan

    Podcasts

Back to top