• news-banner

    Expert Insights

SIAC Rules 2025: Pioneering a New Era of Arbitration

The 7th edition of the Arbitration Rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (the “2025 Rules”) heralds a transformative approach to arbitration, effective from 1 January 2025. These rules, applicable to all arbitrations commenced from that date unless parties stipulate otherwise, are set to redefine the efficiency, flexibility, and transparency of the arbitration process.

Key Innovations of the SIAC Rules 2025:

Streamlined and Expedited Procedures:

The introduction of a Streamlined Procedure in Rule 13 and Schedule 2, complemented by the expanded Expedited Procedure in Rule 14 and Schedule 3, marks a significant shift towards rapid resolution of disputes. At the same time as increasing the threshold for requesting the Expedited Procedure to SGD 10 million from SGD 6 million, the 2025 Rules have introduced the Streamlined Procedure for claims below SGD 1 million, promising final awards within a three-month timeframe, with costs capped at 50 percent of the maximum limits set out in the SIAC’s Schedule of Fees.

Emergency Arbitrator Procedure:

Rule 25 of Schedule 1 to the 2025 Rules breaks new ground by allowing parties to seek emergency interim relief without prior notice to other parties. This provision empowers a party to swiftly seek the appointment of an Emergency Arbitrator for interim measures, alongside a protective preliminary order directing a party not to frustrate the purpose of the emergency interim or conservatory measure, without the need to inform other parties—ensuring immediate action to prevent the dissipation of assets. This enhancement aligns SIAC with the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”) in empowering parties to secure ex parte interim relief. However, in contrast to the  DIAC framework, which permits ex parte applications where “the procedural law applicable to the seat of the arbitration … permits such applications without notice to the other party or parties”, the SIAC Rules offer greater latitude: they entrust the SIAC President with the broad discretion to determine whether to accept protective preliminary order applications.

Preliminary Determination: 

Rule 46 provides a new Preliminary Determination mechanism that enables tribunals to make final and binding decisions on key issues at an early stage in an arbitration, streamlining the arbitration process and potentially saving time and costs. This can be done where the parties agree to grant this power to the tribunal, the applicant is able to demonstrate that a preliminary determination is likely to contribute to savings of time and costs and a more efficient and expeditious resolution of the dispute, or the circumstances of the case otherwise warrant the preliminary determination of the issue. 

Coordinated Proceedings: 

Addressing the complexities of multiple arbitrations, Rule 17 of the 2025 Rules facilitates the synchronized resolution of arbitrations that are not consolidated but that share common legal or factual issues, mitigating the risk of conflicting outcomes and reducing procedural redundancies.

Transparency in Third-Party Funding: 

Rule 38 of the 2025 Rules introduces mandatory disclosure of third-party funders, enhancing transparency and preventing potential conflicts of interest post-tribunal constitution. Tribunals are also empowered to consider funding arrangements when apportioning costs.

Environmental Considerations and Cybersecurity: 

In a forward-thinking move, Rules 32.4(b) and 61 of the 2025 Rules encourage the adoption of environmentally sustainable arbitration practices and robust information security measures, reflecting SIAC's commitment to innovation and responsibility.

The 2025 Rules represent a significant evolution in arbitration practice, integrating best practices from leading arbitration institutions while pioneering unique solutions to contemporary dispute resolution challenges. These updates solidify SIAC's position as a premier venue for international arbitration, offering an efficient, transparent, and cost-effective dispute resolution framework.

As we navigate the complexities of modern commercial disputes, the 2025 Rules stand as a testament to SIAC's visionary leadership in arbitration. They not only anticipate the future needs of global commerce but also respond with agility and precision, ensuring that SIAC remains at the forefront of arbitration excellence.

Our thinking

  • Habits to Prevent Burnout in Law

    Rebecca Piper

    Events

  • Key Developments in International Arbitration for 2026

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Agricultural policy review 2025: Key changes and what to expect in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • QFC Structures for Family Business Succession and Governance

    Ahmad Anani

    Insights

  • Compliance Week quotes Abigail Rushton on the UK’s anti-corruption strategy and compliance lessons for companies and advisors

    Abigail Rushton

    In the Press

  • When Saying “No” to Mediation Is Reasonable: Guidance from Grijns v Grijns

    Bella Preece

    Quick Reads

  • A farm legal resilience checklist: 10-Minute audit to protect your business in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • Internet Retailing quotes Jamie Cartwright on the HFSS advertising ban

    Jamie Cartwright

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Harriet Betteridge, Hannah Catt, Gregoire Uldry and Alex Reid on 2026 predictions in the private wealth space

    Harriet Betteridge

    In the Press

  • Law 360 quotes Caroline Greenwell and Bella Henry on the Santander APP fraud case

    Caroline Greenwell

    In the Press

  • Non-EU Courts on the Enforcement of Spain’s Intra-EU Arbitration Awards: Sovereign Immunity and EU Law Objections

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • New Cryptoasset Reporting Framework (CARF) implemented - how might it affect you?

    Vadim Romanoff

    Quick Reads

  • Cobden v Cobden: the Court of Appeal revisits exceptional circumstances and “proprietary estoppel-ish” equity on dissolution of a farming partnership

    Cora Hardy

    Insights

  • Defamation Defences in Practice: Key Takeaways from the case of Noel Clarke v The Guardian

    Ellen Roberts

    Insights

  • Are Dasher, Dancer and Prancer and friends livestock? Can Father Christmas and his reindeer clear UK animal movement rules in a single night?

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • From tweet to trial: Blake v Fox

    Hannah Gornall

    Insights

  • Merry Christmas to farmers and business owners - a surprise (and very welcome) increase to the 100% APR/BPR allowance

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Thomas R. Snider, Ahmad Anani and Etidal Alwazani write for Daily Jus on the architecture of interim measures under the Qatari Civil and Commercial Arbitration Law

    Thomas R. Snider

    In the Press

  • The Farming Profitability Review and the new Farming and Food Partnership Board: what’s new and what do you need to know?

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • The Lawyer quotes Joseph Evans on the UK government’s plans to introduce legislation to reverse PACCAR

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

Back to top