• news-banner

    Expert Insights

From Algorithms to Awards: Ciarb's New Guidelines on AI for Arbitration

min read

Introduction

At a time where technology is rapidly transforming industries across the globe, the field of arbitration is no exception. The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (Ciarb) has now taken a significant step forward by publishing a set of guidelines to address the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in arbitration proceedings (the 2025 Guidelines). These 2025 Guidelines aim to provide clarity and direction for practitioners and arbitrators around the world, ensuring that AI's potential to assist in dispute resolution procedures is harnessed effectively whilst simultaneously maintaining the integrity and fairness of arbitration proceedings.

Overview of the Guidelines

Ciarb’s 2025 Guidelines provide practical guidance and serve as a pioneering framework for the use of AI technologies within arbitration. They encompass several key areas:

Part I – Benefits and Risks of the Use of AI in Arbitration

The key benefits identified include enhancing the arbitral process in terms of efficiency and quality, as well as the ability to use AI related tools such as legal research, data analysis, text generation, translation, transcription and case analysis.

Alongside the benefits, the 2025 Guidelines also address the key risks associated with using AI such as potential complications surrounding the enforceability of arbitral awards, confidentiality, data security, and algorithmic bias.

Part II – General Recommendations About Use of AI in Arbitration

Ciarb recommends that parties and arbitrators make reasonable enquiries about prospective AI tools and the application of any AI-related rules in the relevant jurisdiction in which any arbitration is proceedings. Parties and arbitrators are also encouraged to engage in understanding the potential risks involved with the use of AI and weigh the balance of the benefits against such risks as opposed to adopting a blanket “one size fits all” approach.

Part III – Parties’ Use of AI In an Arbitration

Guidance on how the parties can effectively incorporate AI technologies into arbitration is provided, explaining how arbitrators can give directions and make procedural rulings on the use of AI, exploring the scope of an arbitrator’s authority to manage the use of AI by the parties.

Part IV – Use of AI by Arbitrators

How arbitrators themselves may utilise AI is also covered. The 2025 Guidelines make clear that whilst arbitrators should use AI to enhance the arbitral process and the quality of their decision making via the production of more accurate and efficient processing of the information submitted to the AI, they must take care not to relinquish decision making power to AI.

Appendix A and B

A template agreement on the use of AI in arbitration, and a template Procedural Order are also annexed for use.

Key Takeaways

There is no doubt that the 2025 Guidelines encourage practitioners and arbitrators alike to embrace AI and proactively adapt to the technological advancements that it offers. They also provide valuable clarity as to the use of AI in arbitration. As AI becomes more extensively used, they will act as a helpful reference point moving forward. By establishing starting point protocols and encouraging collaboration between the parties, their nominated experts and the appointed Tribunal, the 2025 Guidelines also strive to minimise disputes related to the use of AI within arbitration proceedings.

The 2025 Guidelines come at a time where there is a real need for legislation and guidance generally on the use of AI in law. The recent EU AI Act, which came into force on 1 August 2024 and will be fully applicable from 2 August 2026 to AI systems entering the market in EU states, is the first ever legal framework on AI worldwide and regulates the use of certain AI systems. During its two-year implementation period we will no doubt see other supporting legislation and guidance to supplement the Ciarb’s 2025 Guidelines. Watch this space.

Our thinking

  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: In conversation with Wendy Edwards and Karen Ellis

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

  • eprivateclient features an article by Matt Foster and Sarah Moore on untangling crypto assets in divorce

    Matt Foster

    In the Press

    min read
  • Bloomberg Tax quotes Sally Ashford on the forthcoming HMRC requirement for lawyers to register as tax advisers

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

    min read
  • Nicola Thorpe comments in The Telegraph on the importance of certainty for non-doms considering moving to the UK

    Nicola Thorpe

    In the Press

    min read
  • 10 ways the new APR/BPR rules affect estate administration

    Mary Perham

    Insights

    min read
  • ITV News interviews Ben Smith about a parliamentary debate around statutory menstrual leave

    Ben Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Clarification given by the Court of Appeal on rights of first refusal under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987

    Natalie Deuchar

    Insights

    min read
  • Choosing the Right PISCES Platform for Private Company Liquidity

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • How to construe contentious trusts - lessons from recent cases

    Sarah Moore

    Insights

    min read
  • Q&A: Modifying Restrictive Covenants

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

    min read
  • RICS Property Journal features Chandni Pandya and Georgina Muskett on service charges for live/work units

    Chandni Pandya

    In the Press

    min read
  • Grid Connections, Environmental Assessment and the DCO Process – What is the effect of the Raeshaw Farms judgement?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Construction News and Facilities Management Now quote William Turner, Elizabeth Hughes, and Alexander Hemmings on new Construction Industry Scheme rules for supply chain fraud

    Elizabeth Hughes

    In the Press

    min read
  • Eddie Richards and Sadie Pitman write for Logistics Business on the UK's readiness for an electric vehicle revolution

    Sadie Pitman

    In the Press

    min read
  • Chiara Muston comments in People Management on 'empty time' and the gig economy

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

    min read
  • Q&A: Boundary Issues

    Emma Preece

    Insights

    min read
  • Remedy and Leverage: Addressing Human Rights Risks in Corporate Supply Chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2026

    Bart Peerless

    News

    min read
Back to top