• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Employee Ownership Trusts - Government reduces capital gains tax relief on employee ownership trusts in 2025 Budget

The Government has halved the capital gains tax (CGT) relief available on disposals to employee ownership trusts (EOTs), cutting relief from 100% to 50%, with immediate effect from 26 November 2025. The change, to be legislated in the Finance Bill 2025-26, follows on from previous changes introduced affecting the EOT ownership conditions which took effect from 30 October 2024 (see: Employee Ownership Trust reform – what you need to know). Some of the changes introduced in 2024, as well as this latest reduction in relief, have been introduced with a view to continuing to support genuine employee ownership and preventing abuse of the regime. 

Understanding employee ownership trusts

EOTs are a type of employee ownership structure in which the EOT holds a controlling interest in a company for the benefit of its employees. Under the previous rules, individual shareholders who sold their shares to an EOT could claim a complete exemption from CGT on the disposal, provided all statutory conditions were met for the relief to apply. However, following the latest change introduced on Budget day, 50% of that gain will be treated as a chargeable gain for CGT purposes and taxed accordingly, resulting in an overall effective tax rate of up to 12%. The remaining 50% per cent will be relieved at the point of disposal with the expectation that such gain will be held over to come into charge on a future disposal by the trustees (again provided all statutory conditions are met for the relief to apply).

Impact of the 2025 budget on EOT transactions

A significant proportion of the consideration payable on a typical EOT transaction is deferred in nature and paid over a lengthy time period, to enable it to be indirectly funded by the underlying trading company or group out of free cash not otherwise required for the running of the business. The draft legislation published alongside the announcement does not provide for any specific deferral provisions relating to the payment of the CGT due and so it appears the general CGT rules governing the tax treatment of deferred consideration will apply. It remains to be seen whether specific provisions will be introduced before the draft legislation becomes law but, in its current form, prospective sellers to an EOT will need to ensure they understand exactly when and how much CGT will need to be paid in light of any proposed deferred consideration structure, so they can plan to have sufficient cash available to pay the CGT that will now fall due. 

The fiscal reasoning behind the change

The Government’s Budget 2025 document (accessible here: Budget 2025 (HTML) - GOV.UK) clarifies the reasoning for the reform, stating that the relief is costing far more than expected. For example, the entire EOT regime was initially costed at less than £100 million by 2018-19, whereas the relief alone reached £600 million in 2021-22, and, absent intervention, was forecast to rise to £2 billion by 2028-29, around 20 times the original estimate. 

The Government’s policy aim remains to “retain a strong incentive for employee ownership while ensuring that business owners pay their fair share of tax.” By taxing half of the gain at disposal, the Government argues it preserves a materially lower effective rate for qualifying EOT sales compared with alternative exit routes, but at a fiscal cost that is more sustainable. 

What this means for business owners and future exit strategies

The change applies to disposals on or after 26 November 2025, which may provide advisers and shareholders with some reason to pause for thought where transactions are already in train. Sellers who have anticipated a nil-CGT outcome will now face a material charge on half of their gain, which could flow through to pricing, vendor funding and cash out profiles. Additionally, boards weighing an EOT against a trade sale or private equity backed MBO should re-run their comparative models, including the interaction with Business Asset Disposal Relief, earn out structuring and reinvestment alternatives.

While the Government has already tightened other EOT conditions in recent Budgets, including introducing new regulation around trustee residency, independence of the EOT from former owners, and market value safeguards, the shift from full relief to a 50% relief is the clearest signal yet that the regime is being refocused and rebalanced, and we would expect EOT transaction activity to decrease, at least initially, whilst shareholders consider if the EOT structure remains the right succession model.  Of course, for shareholders for whom the EOT structure aligns fully with their values around future employee-ownership, this change is unlikely to make a material difference. 

More broadly, the Autumn 2025 Budget has tightened the tax environment for investors and entrepreneurs alike. Halving capital gains tax relief on sales to employee ownership trusts (EOTs) from 100% to 50%, raising dividend tax rates by two percentage points, and extending the freeze on income tax thresholds for a further three years from 2028, will collectively increase the frictional cost of both exits and income extraction.

Our thinking

  • Jamie Cartwright writes for Independent Schools Magazine on how VAT on private school fees is shaping the future of the independent education sector

    Jamie Cartwright

    In the Press

  • Magnum spins out of Unilever: a clearer investment story but a cool valuation

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

  • Licence to Till: what happens when a ‘Grazing Licence’ is really a tenancy? Accidental tenancies, shams and documents that just don’t do what they say on the tin…

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Georgina Muskett writes for Property Week on the conundrum of green leasing

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • Paramount launches hostile bid for the entirety of Warner Bros

    Grace Hudson

    Quick Reads

  • Property Patter: Top 5 Changes under the new Renters’ Rights Act 2025

    Lauren Fraser

    Podcasts

  • DMCCA: What the UK’s new consumer rules now mean for consumer facing businesses

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Transactions at an undervalue: trusts of land

    Roger Elford

    Insights

  • Ministry of Sound Limited v. The British Foreign Wharf Company Limited (and ors): Balancing terms of a renewal lease with redevelopment potential

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises FIRST and its shareholders on sale to Encore

    Mark Howard

    News

  • International Tax Compliance (Amendment) Regulations 2025: What UK trustees need to know

    Elinor Boote

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Budget 2025: re-thinking EOT transactions

    Mike Barrington

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises longstanding client Puma Growth Partners on its investment in HubBox

    Ashwin Pillay

    News

  • Candy Kittens takes a bite as Unilever slims down

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Budget 2025 – Inheritance Tax (IHT) and charitable gifts

    Richard Honey

    Insights

  • Advocacy: Lessons from The Mandela Brief for International Arbitration Today

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

  • The Times, City AM and the Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on government plans to remove the cap on unfair dismissal claims

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • Promises and probate: when is “detriment” worth the family farm and what happens when a promise is only relied on for a defined period?

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

  • Retail Showcase - Festive Special

    Events

  • Property Week quotes Andrew Ross on the case of Romal Capital v Peel Holdings

    Andrew Ross

    In the Press

Back to top