• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Takeover Panel confirms narrowing of Takeover Code jurisdiction: Key Changes Set for February 2025

min read

On 6 November 2024, the Takeover Panel (the Panel) published its response statement (RS 2024/1) confirming the impending changes to the jurisdictional scope of the Takeover Code (the Code) which are set to take effect on 3 February 2025. This update follows the initial consultation that took place in April (PCP 2024/1) which proposed narrowing the jurisdictional scope of the Code; the details of which were covered in Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code.

The Panel's announcement largely adheres to the proposals outlined in the April draft, with a notable amendment being the transitional arrangements in place for affected companies. Originally set at three years, the Panel has now decided to reduce this period to two years. During this period, such transition companies can explore alternative arrangements, such as amending their articles of association, to provide shareholders with comparable protections to the Code. This run off period also allows shareholders to digest the implications of their from no longer benefiting from the protections afforded by the Code and, if necessary, exit their investments.

What this means for companies subject to the Code

The following table provides a snapshot of the application of the Code up to implementation, during the transition period and following the transition period.

Up to 2 February 2025 (before the implementation date) During 3 February 2025 – 2 February 2027 (the transition period (“TP”)) From 3 February 2027 (following the transition period)
Company status Is the company and Code company? Is the Company and Code Company? Company status Is the company and Code company?
UK quoted Yes

Yes

If the company ceases to be UK quoted during TP, it will be come subject to new 2-year run-off

Remains UK quoted Yes
UK quoted for less than 2 years prior to 3 February 2027 Yes (for 2 years from ceasing to be UK quoted)
Public or private company that ceased to be UK quoted less than 2 years prior to 3 February 2025 Yes, if UK resident 

Transition company, subject to the transitional arrangements. Residency test still applicable, so:

  • Yes, Code company if UK resident at the time of transaction
  • No, not a Code company if not UK resident at the time of transaction
Ceased to be UK quoted more than 2 years prior to 3 February 2027 No
No, if not UK resident

Public or private company that ceased to be UK quoted 2-10 years prior to 3 February 2025;

Public company that was never UK quoted; or

Private company in the 10-year run-off period

Yes, if UK resident 

Transition company, subject to the transitional arrangements. Residency test still applicable, so until earlier of end of: (i) TP and (ii) 10-year run-off:

  • Yes, Code company if UK resident at time of transaction
  • No, not a Code company if not UK resident at time of transaction
Ceased to be UK quoted more than 2 years prior or has never been UK quoted No
No, if not UK resident

Implication of the changes to the Code

The amendments to the Code represent a significant shift in simplification of the Code’s applicability criteria. By providing clarity and reducing the scope of applicability, the Panel has taken a step towards a more efficient and targeted regulatory regime that serves better the needs of the market. The Panel's decision to reduce the run-off period reflects a balance between the need for regulatory oversight and the desire to streamline and simplify the jurisdictional scope of the Code. This change is likely to be welcomed by many, as it reduces the duration of uncertainty for companies that have restructured or changed their corporate structure.

As previously commented in April, the changes are expected to be welcomed by many as it seeks to address criticism that the Code’s current jurisdictional rules are too complex and onerous, leaving it difficult for both market participants and companies to ascertain whether or not the Code is applicable. As the implementation date approaches, it is crucial that affected companies review their status and prepare accordingly.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • In-House Insights: Next Gen Drinks Reception

    Events

    min read
  • Property Patter: the latest on tenant CVAs and Restructuring Plans

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client SPS on its acquisition of Cleardata

    Hamish Perry

    News

    min read
  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys awarded “Legal Advisers of the Year” at the HealthInvestor Awards 2026

    David Coates

    News

    min read
  • 5 things English companies and their investors need to know about human rights-related litigation risks

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Are you ready for the EU Forced Labour Regulation?

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • A founder's guide to SAFEs: fast-tracking investment for UK technology start-ups

    Grace Hudson

    Insights

    min read
  • Practicalities of Property Management Seminar

    Events

    min read
  • Darren Bailey sits on the judging panel for City AM's Football Power List

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill: Where are we now?

    Lauren Fraser

    Insights

    min read
  • “A Fairer End to Relationships”: First Thoughts on the Government's Landmark Consultation

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • Case No. 9. Can an arbitration clause be extended to a non-signatory party, and what are the relevant factors?

    Annapaola Negri-Clementi

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Hutton contributes to Investors' Chronicle exploring the role of trusts in families' financial planning

    Charles Hutton

    In the Press

    min read
  • Robert Lundie Smith writes for WIPR on how enforced arbitration could fix a 'dysfunctional' global FRAND system

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Summer Transfer Window 2026: What Latin American footballers need to know about UK tax before signing with a Premier League Club

    Rafael Boccatto

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, as Liquidator of Awal Bank BSC(c) (In Liquidation), welcomes Bahraini Court judgment upholding liquidator’s rejection of US$2.8 billion of claims and confirming debts owing to Awal Bank of US$2.56 billion

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
Back to top