• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Takeover Panel confirms narrowing of Takeover Code jurisdiction: Key Changes Set for February 2025

On 6 November 2024, the Takeover Panel (the Panel) published its response statement (RS 2024/1) confirming the impending changes to the jurisdictional scope of the Takeover Code (the Code) which are set to take effect on 3 February 2025. This update follows the initial consultation that took place in April (PCP 2024/1) which proposed narrowing the jurisdictional scope of the Code; the details of which were covered in Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code.

The Panel's announcement largely adheres to the proposals outlined in the April draft, with a notable amendment being the transitional arrangements in place for affected companies. Originally set at three years, the Panel has now decided to reduce this period to two years. During this period, such transition companies can explore alternative arrangements, such as amending their articles of association, to provide shareholders with comparable protections to the Code. This run off period also allows shareholders to digest the implications of their from no longer benefiting from the protections afforded by the Code and, if necessary, exit their investments.

What this means for companies subject to the Code

The following table provides a snapshot of the application of the Code up to implementation, during the transition period and following the transition period.

Up to 2 February 2025 (before the implementation date) During 3 February 2025 – 2 February 2027 (the transition period (“TP”)) From 3 February 2027 (following the transition period)
Company status Is the company and Code company? Is the Company and Code Company? Company status Is the company and Code company?
UK quoted Yes

Yes

If the company ceases to be UK quoted during TP, it will be come subject to new 2-year run-off

Remains UK quoted Yes
UK quoted for less than 2 years prior to 3 February 2027 Yes (for 2 years from ceasing to be UK quoted)
Public or private company that ceased to be UK quoted less than 2 years prior to 3 February 2025 Yes, if UK resident 

Transition company, subject to the transitional arrangements. Residency test still applicable, so:

  • Yes, Code company if UK resident at the time of transaction
  • No, not a Code company if not UK resident at the time of transaction
Ceased to be UK quoted more than 2 years prior to 3 February 2027 No
No, if not UK resident

Public or private company that ceased to be UK quoted 2-10 years prior to 3 February 2025;

Public company that was never UK quoted; or

Private company in the 10-year run-off period

Yes, if UK resident 

Transition company, subject to the transitional arrangements. Residency test still applicable, so until earlier of end of: (i) TP and (ii) 10-year run-off:

  • Yes, Code company if UK resident at time of transaction
  • No, not a Code company if not UK resident at time of transaction
Ceased to be UK quoted more than 2 years prior or has never been UK quoted No
No, if not UK resident

Implication of the changes to the Code

The amendments to the Code represent a significant shift in simplification of the Code’s applicability criteria. By providing clarity and reducing the scope of applicability, the Panel has taken a step towards a more efficient and targeted regulatory regime that serves better the needs of the market. The Panel's decision to reduce the run-off period reflects a balance between the need for regulatory oversight and the desire to streamline and simplify the jurisdictional scope of the Code. This change is likely to be welcomed by many, as it reduces the duration of uncertainty for companies that have restructured or changed their corporate structure.

As previously commented in April, the changes are expected to be welcomed by many as it seeks to address criticism that the Code’s current jurisdictional rules are too complex and onerous, leaving it difficult for both market participants and companies to ascertain whether or not the Code is applicable. As the implementation date approaches, it is crucial that affected companies review their status and prepare accordingly.

Our thinking

  • An introduction to the new Procurement Act 2023

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Mind the Gap Trade Mark

    Charlotte Duly

    Insights

  • A Closer Look at the Meaning of ‘Investor’ in Investment Treaty Arbitration

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Rivals: Filming Locations and Considerations for Landed Estates

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to unfair prejudice petitions

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

  • Beyond Dry January: The Rise of the Low and Non-Alcoholic Beverage Sector

    Iwan Thomas

    Insights

  • New food and drink ads regulation & impact on live sports broadcasts

    Sarah Johnson

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts Hard Conversations and Smart Conflict®, a Women in Leadership event

    Sarah Wigington

    News

  • AML in decentralized finance and traditional finance

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Sangna Chauhan on the impact of the abolition of UK non-dom status on her workload

    Sangna Chauhan

    In the Press

  • Up in the AI: Gen AI & looking forwards, and backwards

    Joe Cohen

    Podcasts

  • International Arbitration: 2024 in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Growth Partners on its lead investment as part of a $4.3 million funding round for finance-focused legal AI specialist, Semeris

    David Coates

    News

  • Building Safety: What’s in store for 2025?

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Claire Fallows on planning law reform

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • Budget 2024 and its impact on IHT and estates

    Harriet Betteridge

    Podcasts

  • Corporate deal round-up H2 2024

    David Coates

    Insights

  • Joe Cohen features in The Lawyer’s ‘Hot 100’ list for 2024-25

    Joe Cohen

    News

  • Appointment of company directors – who can do it and how?

    Stephen Burns

    Insights

  • A Digital Pound: The Bank of England January 2025 Update

    Racheal Muldoon

    Insights

Back to top