• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Takeover Panel confirms narrowing of Takeover Code jurisdiction: Key Changes Set for February 2025

min read

On 6 November 2024, the Takeover Panel (the Panel) published its response statement (RS 2024/1) confirming the impending changes to the jurisdictional scope of the Takeover Code (the Code) which are set to take effect on 3 February 2025. This update follows the initial consultation that took place in April (PCP 2024/1) which proposed narrowing the jurisdictional scope of the Code; the details of which were covered in Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code.

The Panel's announcement largely adheres to the proposals outlined in the April draft, with a notable amendment being the transitional arrangements in place for affected companies. Originally set at three years, the Panel has now decided to reduce this period to two years. During this period, such transition companies can explore alternative arrangements, such as amending their articles of association, to provide shareholders with comparable protections to the Code. This run off period also allows shareholders to digest the implications of their from no longer benefiting from the protections afforded by the Code and, if necessary, exit their investments.

What this means for companies subject to the Code

The following table provides a snapshot of the application of the Code up to implementation, during the transition period and following the transition period.

Up to 2 February 2025 (before the implementation date) During 3 February 2025 – 2 February 2027 (the transition period (“TP”)) From 3 February 2027 (following the transition period)
Company status Is the company and Code company? Is the Company and Code Company? Company status Is the company and Code company?
UK quoted Yes

Yes

If the company ceases to be UK quoted during TP, it will be come subject to new 2-year run-off

Remains UK quoted Yes
UK quoted for less than 2 years prior to 3 February 2027 Yes (for 2 years from ceasing to be UK quoted)
Public or private company that ceased to be UK quoted less than 2 years prior to 3 February 2025 Yes, if UK resident 

Transition company, subject to the transitional arrangements. Residency test still applicable, so:

  • Yes, Code company if UK resident at the time of transaction
  • No, not a Code company if not UK resident at the time of transaction
Ceased to be UK quoted more than 2 years prior to 3 February 2027 No
No, if not UK resident

Public or private company that ceased to be UK quoted 2-10 years prior to 3 February 2025;

Public company that was never UK quoted; or

Private company in the 10-year run-off period

Yes, if UK resident 

Transition company, subject to the transitional arrangements. Residency test still applicable, so until earlier of end of: (i) TP and (ii) 10-year run-off:

  • Yes, Code company if UK resident at time of transaction
  • No, not a Code company if not UK resident at time of transaction
Ceased to be UK quoted more than 2 years prior or has never been UK quoted No
No, if not UK resident

Implication of the changes to the Code

The amendments to the Code represent a significant shift in simplification of the Code’s applicability criteria. By providing clarity and reducing the scope of applicability, the Panel has taken a step towards a more efficient and targeted regulatory regime that serves better the needs of the market. The Panel's decision to reduce the run-off period reflects a balance between the need for regulatory oversight and the desire to streamline and simplify the jurisdictional scope of the Code. This change is likely to be welcomed by many, as it reduces the duration of uncertainty for companies that have restructured or changed their corporate structure.

As previously commented in April, the changes are expected to be welcomed by many as it seeks to address criticism that the Code’s current jurisdictional rules are too complex and onerous, leaving it difficult for both market participants and companies to ascertain whether or not the Code is applicable. As the implementation date approaches, it is crucial that affected companies review their status and prepare accordingly.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens Middle East Corporate practice with appointment of Philip O’Riordan

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • CasinoBeats quotes Darren Bailey on player betting bans and sports gambling partnerships

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • William Longrigg writes in the Law Society Gazette on the potential return of Calderbank offers in family proceedings

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top