• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Takeover Panel confirms narrowing of Takeover Code jurisdiction: Key Changes Set for February 2025

On 6 November 2024, the Takeover Panel (the Panel) published its response statement (RS 2024/1) confirming the impending changes to the jurisdictional scope of the Takeover Code (the Code) which are set to take effect on 3 February 2025. This update follows the initial consultation that took place in April (PCP 2024/1) which proposed narrowing the jurisdictional scope of the Code; the details of which were covered in Takeover Panel consults on narrowing the scope of the Takeover Code.

The Panel's announcement largely adheres to the proposals outlined in the April draft, with a notable amendment being the transitional arrangements in place for affected companies. Originally set at three years, the Panel has now decided to reduce this period to two years. During this period, such transition companies can explore alternative arrangements, such as amending their articles of association, to provide shareholders with comparable protections to the Code. This run off period also allows shareholders to digest the implications of their from no longer benefiting from the protections afforded by the Code and, if necessary, exit their investments.

What this means for companies subject to the Code

The following table provides a snapshot of the application of the Code up to implementation, during the transition period and following the transition period.

Up to 2 February 2025 (before the implementation date) During 3 February 2025 – 2 February 2027 (the transition period (“TP”)) From 3 February 2027 (following the transition period)
Company status Is the company and Code company? Is the Company and Code Company? Company status Is the company and Code company?
UK quoted Yes

Yes

If the company ceases to be UK quoted during TP, it will be come subject to new 2-year run-off

Remains UK quoted Yes
UK quoted for less than 2 years prior to 3 February 2027 Yes (for 2 years from ceasing to be UK quoted)
Public or private company that ceased to be UK quoted less than 2 years prior to 3 February 2025 Yes, if UK resident 

Transition company, subject to the transitional arrangements. Residency test still applicable, so:

  • Yes, Code company if UK resident at the time of transaction
  • No, not a Code company if not UK resident at the time of transaction
Ceased to be UK quoted more than 2 years prior to 3 February 2027 No
No, if not UK resident

Public or private company that ceased to be UK quoted 2-10 years prior to 3 February 2025;

Public company that was never UK quoted; or

Private company in the 10-year run-off period

Yes, if UK resident 

Transition company, subject to the transitional arrangements. Residency test still applicable, so until earlier of end of: (i) TP and (ii) 10-year run-off:

  • Yes, Code company if UK resident at time of transaction
  • No, not a Code company if not UK resident at time of transaction
Ceased to be UK quoted more than 2 years prior or has never been UK quoted No
No, if not UK resident

Implication of the changes to the Code

The amendments to the Code represent a significant shift in simplification of the Code’s applicability criteria. By providing clarity and reducing the scope of applicability, the Panel has taken a step towards a more efficient and targeted regulatory regime that serves better the needs of the market. The Panel's decision to reduce the run-off period reflects a balance between the need for regulatory oversight and the desire to streamline and simplify the jurisdictional scope of the Code. This change is likely to be welcomed by many, as it reduces the duration of uncertainty for companies that have restructured or changed their corporate structure.

As previously commented in April, the changes are expected to be welcomed by many as it seeks to address criticism that the Code’s current jurisdictional rules are too complex and onerous, leaving it difficult for both market participants and companies to ascertain whether or not the Code is applicable. As the implementation date approaches, it is crucial that affected companies review their status and prepare accordingly.

Our thinking

  • Reporting Relief Ahead: Who benefits from the UK’s 2026 changes?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Quick Reads

  • The Challenge of Waste Crime – Signals for 2026

    Rachel Warren

    Insights

  • When is a prospectus required under the new regime?

    Brianna Davies

    Quick Reads

  • Providence v Hexagon: Supreme Court clarifies specified default and accrued rights of termination under a JCT Contract

    David Savage

    Insights

  • The Telegraph quotes William Marriott on the importance of correctly completing a property information form and the onus placed on sellers

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • ESG considerations in the UAE: what businesses need to know

    Dalal Alhouti

    Insights

  • Top Tips for Homes England Transactions

    Alexander Gold

    Quick Reads

  • The Spotlight of Sports Investment: Reputation as Capital

    Ellen Roberts

    Insights

  • Update on UK ESG ratings regulation: FCA consults on rules to improve transparency and trust in the ESG ratings market

    Megan Gray

    Quick Reads

  • UK Real Estate Sector: 2026 and Beyond

    Sarah Morley

    Insights

  • Agricultural law review 2025/2026: Key cases and legislation in 2025 and what’s ahead in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Extra Time: Football Beyond Borders – the Lost Boys taskforce

    David Savage

    Podcasts

  • How are FICs funded and what are the tax implications?

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

  • Construction & Infrastructure Lookahead for 2026

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

  • UK Surrogacy and proposed reform

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • The Daily Telegraph quotes Nick Hurley on Labour’s plans to ban ‘non-compete’ agreements in the UK

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • POATR - what are protected forward looking statements?

    Emily Dobson

    Quick Reads

  • Key Developments in International Arbitration for 2026

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Agricultural policy review 2025: Key changes and what to expect in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • MTF admission prospectuses – what are they and why have they been “introduced” by POATR?

    Emily Dobson

    Quick Reads

Back to top