• news-banner

    Expert Insights

UK Government issues initial consultation on potential new power to block listings on national security grounds

min read

Introduction

On 7 June 2021 the UK Government published an initial consultation seeking views on a proposed new power to allow it to block a company’s listing, if the listing presents a risk to national security.  The consultation is available here.

The consultation followed the Government identifying concerns about the possible links between listings and national security in its 2019 Economic Crime Plan and undertaking to investigate these concerns further.

In November 2020, the Government announced that its further investigations had shown that there were remote but possible scenarios in which a company listing in the UK could be detrimental to national security – and that it intended to introduce a precautionary power to block listings on national security grounds, with a consultation in 2021.

Scope of the proposed new power

The Government is proposing that the new power to block listings on national security grounds would:

  • Apply alongside other existing protections and safeguards in place in the UK (such as the criminal checks undertaken as part of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime and the anti-money laundering and sanction framework).
  • Be narrowly focussed on national security grounds – and therefore would be expected to have a minimal impact on the listing process and on the vast majority of companies seeking to raise capital.
  • Cover all initial equity listings and admissions on UK public markets.
  • Require companies that are proposing to list to make additional disclosures to allow for the purposes of national security screening.
  • Potentially allow companies to obtain reassurance on the application of the power to their listings by engagement with Government before they reach the point of submitting routine admission documents such as the prospectus.

Next steps

The consultation closed on 27 August 2021 and the Government is now considering responses.  Once it has done so, it expects to publish a formal response. It also anticipates issuing further technical consultations as its proposals for the power develop.

This article is part of our biannual Public Company Update – sign up to receive this newsletter using the subscribe button. For more information on the above please contact Paul Stone or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact. 

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens Middle East Corporate practice with appointment of Philip O’Riordan

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • CasinoBeats quotes Darren Bailey on player betting bans and sports gambling partnerships

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • William Longrigg writes in the Law Society Gazette on the potential return of Calderbank offers in family proceedings

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top