• news-banner

    Expert Insights

National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent

min read

The National Security and Investment Act received Royal Assent on 29 April 2021 and is expected to come into force towards the end of this year.

The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other types of transactions that could threaten national security. 

Under the new regime, certain acquisitions of businesses active in sensitive sectors will require mandatory notification to and clearance by the Government before they can be completed. Other transactions will be subject to voluntary notification or being called in for investigation where no notification is made.

The new regime represents a significant extension of the UK Government’s powers to review transactions on national security grounds and will replace the current regime, under which only transactions that qualify as a merger for the purposes of the UK merger control rules can be investigated.

The Act will have retrospective application in relation to transactions completed in the period between the introduction of the National Security and Investment Bill on 12 November 2020 and the Act coming into force later this year. The Government will have the ability to call in for investigation such transactions for a period of five years after the Act comes into force.  

What are the new powers?

The new Act will:

  • enable the Government to investigate transactions which involve the acquisition of control or influence over an entity or asset, whether or not the transaction has been notified to the Government.
  • require mandatory notification of certain types of acquisitions of shares or voting rights in companies and other entities operating in sensitive sectors of the economy, such as quantum technologies or nuclear. In such cases, completion of the acquisition will be prohibited unless and until approval has been given by the Government.
  • render void any transaction subject to mandatory notification which is completed without approval. Such action will also constitute a criminal offence.
  • introduce a voluntary notification system for transactions that do not require mandatory notification but which may still raise national security concerns.
  • allow the Government to impose remedies to address risks to national security (including prohibiting a transaction where considered necessary) and sanctions for non-compliance with the regime.

What type of transactions will require mandatory notification?

The mandatory notification regime will apply to acquisitions of companies or other entities operating in certain sensitive sectors, where the acquirer will acquire at least 25% of the votes or shares of the target - or sufficient voting rights to enable or prevent the passage of any class of resolution.

The Government had originally proposed that any stake of 15% or more would be caught, but increased this to 25% in view of concerns that the lower level would bring too many transactions within the scope of the mandatory notification regime. 

Despite this change, the Government will retain the power to review of its own accord transactions involving a stake lower than 25%, where the stake is considered to confer material influence.

The precise scope of the sectors falling within the mandatory notification regime will be set out in regulations in due course.

This article was written by Paul Stone. For more information, please contact Paul or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • What Wadworth Tells Us About the Next Phase of PISCES

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Supply chain social audits: what they are, their limitations, and why they matter for human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Building Safety Levy: What Do the Proposed 2026 Amendments Mean?

    Mark Barley

    Insights

    min read
  • Autumn Budget 2026: possible CGT changes and pre-budget planning

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Family team successfully represent high-profile businessman in High Court jurisdiction dispute case

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can you terminate an “indefinite” trade mark licence even if there’s no express right to do so?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Insights

    min read
  • Technology, AI and US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Shaping the Future of AIM: What the New AIM Rules Mean for Growth Companies, Founders and Advisers

    Paul Arathoon

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge, and Lyla Gilbert write in Packaging Europe about landmark reforms on packaging sustainability regulations in the UK and Europe

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Rebecca Morjaria and Steven Carey write in Building about liability for defective construction products

    Rebecca Morjaria

    In the Press

    min read
  • Arbitrating Construction Disputes – Comparing the ICC, LCIA, SIAC and SCCA Rules

    Christopher O'Brien

    Insights

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath discusses Charles Russell Speechlys' strategic US expansion with Legal Business

    In the Press

    min read
  • What last week’s Bank of England decision means for private capital stakeholders

    Philip Withey

    Insights

    min read
  • Corporate Deal Highlights - A spotlight on H1 2026

    Sarah Wigington

    Insights

    min read
  • Anna Sowerby writes in City AM about the implications for sponsorship agreements when sporting events are cancelled

    Anna Sowerby

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top