• news-banner

    Expert Insights

National Security and Investment Act granted Royal Assent

The National Security and Investment Act received Royal Assent on 29 April 2021 and is expected to come into force towards the end of this year.

The Act establishes a new regime for the review of mergers, acquisitions and other types of transactions that could threaten national security. 

Under the new regime, certain acquisitions of businesses active in sensitive sectors will require mandatory notification to and clearance by the Government before they can be completed. Other transactions will be subject to voluntary notification or being called in for investigation where no notification is made.

The new regime represents a significant extension of the UK Government’s powers to review transactions on national security grounds and will replace the current regime, under which only transactions that qualify as a merger for the purposes of the UK merger control rules can be investigated.

The Act will have retrospective application in relation to transactions completed in the period between the introduction of the National Security and Investment Bill on 12 November 2020 and the Act coming into force later this year. The Government will have the ability to call in for investigation such transactions for a period of five years after the Act comes into force.  

What are the new powers?

The new Act will:

  • enable the Government to investigate transactions which involve the acquisition of control or influence over an entity or asset, whether or not the transaction has been notified to the Government.
  • require mandatory notification of certain types of acquisitions of shares or voting rights in companies and other entities operating in sensitive sectors of the economy, such as quantum technologies or nuclear. In such cases, completion of the acquisition will be prohibited unless and until approval has been given by the Government.
  • render void any transaction subject to mandatory notification which is completed without approval. Such action will also constitute a criminal offence.
  • introduce a voluntary notification system for transactions that do not require mandatory notification but which may still raise national security concerns.
  • allow the Government to impose remedies to address risks to national security (including prohibiting a transaction where considered necessary) and sanctions for non-compliance with the regime.

What type of transactions will require mandatory notification?

The mandatory notification regime will apply to acquisitions of companies or other entities operating in certain sensitive sectors, where the acquirer will acquire at least 25% of the votes or shares of the target - or sufficient voting rights to enable or prevent the passage of any class of resolution.

The Government had originally proposed that any stake of 15% or more would be caught, but increased this to 25% in view of concerns that the lower level would bring too many transactions within the scope of the mandatory notification regime. 

Despite this change, the Government will retain the power to review of its own accord transactions involving a stake lower than 25%, where the stake is considered to confer material influence.

The precise scope of the sectors falling within the mandatory notification regime will be set out in regulations in due course.

This article was written by Paul Stone. For more information, please contact Paul or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

Our thinking

  • CTBUH Annual Conference: Mastering ESG Challenges and the Launch of the Global In-House Counsel Assembly

    Kerry Stares

    Events

  • IBA Annual Conference 2024

    Charlotte Ford

    Events

  • International Arbitration Conference 2024 conference

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

  • Removing A Trustee From a Trust

    Lydia Kember

    Insights

  • Benoît Pasquier and Alex Needham write for City AM on ensuring a more equitable future at the Olympic Games

    Benoît Pasquier

    In the Press

  • Regime change: The beginning of the end of the remittance basis

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Oasis and the Often Overlooked Benefit of Dynamic Pricing

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • Q&A: What evidence can establish boundaries?

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

  • Estates Gazette, New Civil Engineer and BE News quote David Savage on the Grenfell Phase 2 Inquiry report

    David Savage

    In the Press

  • Property Week quotes James Souter on a legal case relating to Annington Properties and the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act

    James Souter

    In the Press

  • Thomas Moran and Ruth Morris write for Prime Resi on the future of London's prime property market

    Thomas Moran

    In the Press

  • Budgeting for change: what should Landed Estates be doing before the Budget?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • FCA Consultations on prospectus regime

    Jodie Dennis

    Insights

  • The Telegraph quotes Dominic Lawrance on anticipated tax changes and the impact on non-doms

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • “I object!” The use of non-objection clauses and confidentiality provisions in the context of Development Consent Order applications

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens Corporate offering with the appointment of Ahmad Anani in Doha, Qatar

    Ahmad Anani

    News

  • Darren Bailey writes for City AM on the NFL’s decision to allow private equity investment

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

  • Relocation to Italy: Italian Lump Sum Tax Regime

    Nicola Saccardo

    Insights

  • App Fraud - where are we now?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Former F1 boss claims HSBC mis-sold ‘low-risk’ bond linked to high-risk property markets

    Joe Edwards

    Insights

Back to top