• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Points of practice – tips on FCA and LSE completion processes

For those advisers responsible for handling the FCA’s and LSE’s completion processes relating to securities issuance, there are detailed and precise administrative processes to be navigated (and tripwires for the unwary!). In this article, we set out some of the key points of practice arising from our experiences.

The first point to note is that there is a separate protocol which must be followed with each body, which we summarise below. 

FCA process

The FCA’s process is conducted primarily via its Electronic Submission System (ESS) portal, with some separate communication by email also required. Depending on the circumstances, either one or two separate cases must be opened for each matter on the ESS.

Where a prospectus is required for an issue of shares, both (1) a transaction review file and (2) an issuer management file must be opened. Where a prospectus is not required, only an issuer management file need be opened. 

Transaction review file

Where a prospectus is required, a transaction review file must be opened, and used to submit each proof of the prospectus and any supporting documents, such as competent person’s reports.

In order to reach completion, the prospectus must be submitted (i) in final clean form with marginal references, (ii) in final clean form without marginal references and (iii) as a redline against the preceding version. 

In addition, final versions of any accompanying checklists, signed by an officer of the company, must be submitted via the ESS, noting that there is no requirement, according to the FCA website, to resubmit Prospectus Regulation Rules cross-reference lists after the initial submission. 

The following ancillary items are also required in order to reach completion (which are available here), in each case submitted via the ESS unless otherwise stated: 

  • form A (an application for a prospectus to be approved by the FCA);
  • publication form (noting where the prospectus will be published);
  • no change confirmation (noting that there have been no changes to a previously submitted form A, publication form and any information incorporated by reference);
  • payment form (noting payment of the FCA’s fee);
  • sanctions letter noting that the issuer does not fall under article 5.1 or 5.2 of Council Regulation (EU) No 960/2014 of 8 September 2014;
  • eligibility letter, which in the FCA’s own words is “an opportunity to put the transaction in context and to draw to [its] attention… the key issues”; and
  • contact details confirmation form, which should be sent to PMMteam@fca.org.uk
Issuer management file

The following documents must be uploaded to the issuer management file on the ESS:

  • if a prospectus is required, a clean version of it without marginal references (i.e. the version which will be published) must be submitted;
  • notice of approval of documents (which will have been sent by email by the readers on the transaction review file once the prospectus has been approved);
  • copies of announcements relating to the placing and admission. The FCA will require a copy of the published announcement, rather than a draft announcement; and
  • a letter confirming compliance with EU sanctions (specifically that the issuer does not fall under article 5.1 or 5.2 of Council Regulation (EU) No 960/2014 of 8 September 2014).

Separately, the following must be submitted by email to the FCA at listingapplications@fca.org.uk ahead of the admission hearing:

  • confirmation that the placing agreement (if one has been used) has become unconditional in all respects;
  • that all other conditions, save admission, have been met; and
  • the home member state of the issuer for the purposes of the Transparency Directive. 

LSE process

The LSE process is conducted exclusively via email. There are two parallel email addresses used by the LSE: Admissions@lseg.com and AdmissionsInbox@lseg.com. For the avoidance of doubt, we recommend that all email correspondence with the LSE in relation to admissions of shares to trading are addressed to both of these email addresses.

An admission hearing must be booked with the LSE in order for admission of securities to take place.

The LSE requires the following documents ahead of the admission hearing:

  • completed form 1 (available from the LSE website here);
  • completion board minutes of the issuer relating to the issue of shares;
  • copy of the notice of AGM or GM (if such a meeting is being held in relation to the relevant issue);
  • confirmation that any shareholder resolutions relating to the issue have been passed; and
  • copies of announcements relating to the placing and admission. The LSE will require a copy of the published announcement, rather than a draft announcement.

The completed form 1 is required to be submitted to the LSE by no later than 48 hours prior to the date of the admission hearing.

The remaining documents may be sent at any time prior to the admission hearing, but in order to ensure that the LSE has time to process the documents and to raise any questions they have in relation to them, it is advisable to, if possible, submit the other documents at least as early as the form 1.

For more information, please contact Nathan Lightman or Mark Howard at Charles Russell Speechlys.

Our thinking

  • Mental Health Management

    Nick Hurley

    Events

  • Doing business in the UAE & Israel

    William Reichert

    Events

  • Calculating Social Value in BTR

    Francis Ho

    Events

  • Dangers of trusts

    Mark Summers

    Events

  • In-House Insights

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • City AM quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s new set of principles for regulating AI

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Hamish Perry and Mike Barrington write for The Evening Standard on whether a merger between the CBI and Make UK can work

    Hamish Perry

    In the Press

  • Silicon quotes Gareth Mills on the UK consumer lawsuit against Google

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Property Week quotes Louise Ward on the additional support required by aspiring UK life sciences operators

    Louise Ward

    In the Press

  • Sarah Higgins and David Wells-Cole write for Wealth Briefing on the pitfalls of using unregulated legal services

    Sarah Higgins

    In the Press

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Georgina Muskett

    Quick Reads

  • New Governance Guidelines for family-owned businesses in the UAE

    William Reichert

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys’ UK offices receive environmental certification

    Kerry Stares

    News

  • Case analysis: URS Corporation Ltd V BDW Trading Ltd

    James Worthington

    Insights

  • True value adjudications; don’t jump the gun!

    Christopher Busaileh

    Insights

  • Financial Reporter quotes Rhys Novak on a new FCA review into the treatment of PEPs

    Rhys Novak

    In the Press

  • In-House Insights Programme 23/24

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Restrictive covenants – who has the benefit?

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

  • First time buyers relief and trusts

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • City AM quotes Ashwin Pillay on the latest round of ONS M&A statistics

    Ashwin Pillay

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: Top 5 Notice Traps

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Football Insider quotes Kelvin Tanner and Owen Chan on how the ESC Endorsement Path could affect scouting and transfers

    Kelvin Tanner

    In the Press

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Will the downturn in the Paris region property market lead property companies to turn to ad hoc proceedings, as they did in the 1990s?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Making BitCoin a BitClearer

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Key figures gather to discuss the future of Gloucestershire

    Jonathan Morley

    Quick Reads

  • UK CMA's blocks Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard, a potentially significant decision for SMEs in the video gaming sector

    Rebecca Burford

    Quick Reads

  • Key takeaways from the UK Government's "Green Day"

    Martha Glaser

    Quick Reads

  • From Holby City to 5 Fleet Place - David Ames shares his experience of "Behind the Lens" with CRS

    Quick Reads

  • The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 in Action

    Sophia Leeder

    Quick Reads

  • Number crunching times

    Emma Humphreys

    Quick Reads

  • This week in the news: inheritance tax interest costs rising due to Probate delays

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • WhatsAppGate - Should businesses be reviewing their social media policies?

    Anna Rogers

    Quick Reads

  • Updates to EMI Options in the Spring Budget 2023

    Quick Reads

  • Dubai announces its plan to streamline the enforcement of civil judgments and arbitral awards

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

Back to top