• news-banner

    Expert Insights

HMRC’s volte face on the “second home” SDLT surcharge

HMRC has this month updated its guidance on the 3% SDLT surcharge (also known as the “Higher Rates for Additional Dwellings” or HRAD) in its SDLT manual. The 3% surcharge applies (very broadly) where a purchaser of one or more dwellings already has an interest in a dwelling anywhere else in the world, and is not replacing their main residence. It also applies where a company is purchasing one or more dwellings (unless the flat 15% rate applies).  

The residential rates of SDLT with HRAD on top are punishing, with a top rate of 15% (set to rise further once the new non-resident surcharge kicks in next April). If a buyer purchases non-residential property or a mix of residential and non-residential property then the 3% surcharge does not apply because the consideration is taxable at the non-residential rates of SDLT. If more than one dwelling is purchased in the same transaction (or as part of linked transactions), then a relief is available which can reduce the total SDLT bill (multiple dwellings relief, or MDR). But what happens when MDR is claimed on a mixed use purchase?

HMRC’s previous guidance stated that the surcharge rates apply where multiple dwellings are bought together with non-residential property and MDR is claimed by the buyer on the residential elements of the transaction.  That view has now changed. In the new guidance, HMRC states that the 3% surcharge only applies to purchases of mixed use land if:

1. MDR is claimed in relation to the residential element of the transaction; and

2. the non-residential element of the transaction is “negligible or artificially contrived”.

This is welcome news but the position is still far from clear. HMRC does not provide an interpretation of the term “negligible or artificially contrived”, and so there is no “bright line” until this is tested through challenges to HMRC’s treatment of various transactions in the tax tribunal.

HMRC does address this uncertainty in its guidance, saying that if it is unclear as to whether HMRC would regard the non-residential element of a mixed transaction as “negligible” a non-statutory clearance application can be made to HMRC. This will however take additional time, could give rise to additional cost and risks a negative response, all of which may put off prospective purchasers from making such an application.

Taxpayers should consider if they may have overpaid SDLT on mixed use, multiple dwelling transactions in the last 12 months. In some instances taxpayers can reclaim overpaid SDLT for up to four years after the effective date of the transaction but this is subject to a number of conditions which would need to be considered on a case by case basis.

For more information, please contact Helen Coward.

Our thinking

  • LIIARC Tax Investigations Uncovered: Legal Tactics, Courtroom Trends & Strategic Remedies

    Caroline Greenwell

    Events

  • Succession Stumbling Blocks: Lessons from Thomas v Countryside Solutions Ltd

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • Morning Star UK quotes Julia Cox on the impact of potential inheritance tax rises in the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • What legal developments can the Living Sector expect as we approach the end of 2025 and look ahead to 2026?

    Mark White

    Insights

  • CDR Magazine quotes Jue Jun Lu on China’s newly revised arbitration law

    Jue Jun Lu

    In the Press

  • Good Divorce Week 2025: Believe it or not, there is a better way

    Emily Borrowdale

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters its Corporate team with the appointment of Ed Morgan

    David Collins

    News

  • Autumn Budget 2025: Sifting the Rumours on Tax Rises and Reforms

    Charlotte Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Adjudication under the Construction Act – a case on the residential occupier exception and contesting the validity of a payless notice

    Tegan Johnson

    Insights

  • VAT on Developer’s Biodiversity net gain (BNG) costs

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Lifting the Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) £250,000 options cap: Better Late than Never

    Shree Patel

    Quick Reads

  • Princes’ float: a welcome listing, but the price says confidence is still scarce

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

  • Understanding the Fire Safety (Residential Evacuation Plans) (England) Regulations 2025: The Living Sector

    David Savage

    Insights

  • Cross-border estates and the new “non-dom” regime: UK IHT reporting on death

    Harriet Betteridge

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for Family Office Magazine on the attractiveness of hotels as an asset class

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes David Savage on the latest round of administration statistics in the construction sector

    David Savage

    In the Press

  • What role can construction lawyers play in helping UK construction sector clients achieve greater success and how?

    David Savage

    Insights

  • Dubai Law No. 7 of 2025: Regulatory Shifts in the Contracting Sector

    Paula Boast MBE

    Quick Reads

  • Harriet Betteridge writes for Tax Adviser on pensions and inheritance tax

    Harriet Betteridge

    In the Press

  • Disputes Over Donuts: Mediation - An International Perspective

    Tamasin Perkins

    Podcasts

Back to top