• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Corporate Governance and Insolvency Act 2020

min read

Meeting in uncertain times

The Corporate Governance and Insolvency Act 2020 (the Act) finally received Royal Assent on 25 June 2020, coming into effect on 26 June 2020, after a rather lengthy legislative process for an Act aimed at providing short-term emergency support.

It took effect retrospectively and provides (amongst other things) assistance to companies seeking to hold shareholder meetings during the pandemic. This assistance is in the form of relaxations to the requirements in legislation and companies’ own articles of association as to how meetings being held between 26 March 2020 and (following now two extensions to the initial period by Statutory Instruments laid in September and November) 30 March 2021 can be conducted. Notably, pursuant to the Act:

  1. Meetings can be held “virtually”, without the meeting having to take place at a physical location, via say an electronic platform or conference call: companies were struggling with how to hold meetings under lockdown and the majority of companies’ articles of association do not provide for virtual (where there is no physical location and the meeting is held through an electronic platform) or hybrid (where there is a physical meeting in addition to electronic participation) meetings, so this offers helpful flexibility as the Act overrides articles of association. More companies are now looking to amend their articles of association to provide for electronic participation in meetings, but whilst hybrid meetings are becoming more accepted there are still concerns around fully “virtual” meetings, both technical and from shareholders and shareholder bodies who value the forum offered by a physical meeting;
  2. Votes can be cast electronically: however, in practice voting in advance via proxies (whether posted or submitted electronically) makes voting less of an issue in any case; and
  3. Members do not have the right to attend or participate other than by voting: during the first lockdown it was clear that it was not possible to hold a public gathering and so chairmen had the power to exclude members from attending meetings in person. However, as lockdown restrictions have varied and continue to do so this offers helpful certainty for companies that they can exclude members from attending physically. This allows a pragmatic approach to be taken and avoids the logistical issues in having to provide a fall back physical venue meeting the requirements of the then current Government lockdown provisions and health and safety concerns.

The delay in the adoption of the legislation was largely due to the longer-term insolvency measures being introduced within the Act, which held up the short-term measures to assist with holding shareholder meetings. The same issue returned when the Government were first extending the period to which the provisions applied from the initial end date of 30 September. In the end the Government left it until 24 September to lay the extension regulations before Parliament; these extended the period to 30 December 2020. The legal community had since been pressing Government to avoid a similar situation towards the end of December waiting to confirm if the provisions would be extended. It is pleasing to see that certainty has been provided a lot earlier this time, with the extension to 30 March 2021 being confirmed in a Statutory Instrument laid before Parliament on 25 November 2020.

In the meantime, we are advising various clients on whether and how to update their articles of association to include appropriately updated meeting provisions, in respect of which there are numerous pitfalls and aspects to consider around for example the practicalities of running meetings and ensuring the provisions work for the company’s shareholder base and will be well received. There is certainly an opportunity now to take the time to consider and update constitutional provisions and related processes to be fully fit for purpose and perhaps increase and improve shareholder engagement for the future.

Note: this article was updated on 25 November 2020 following laying of the new statutory instrument before Parliament.

Our thinking

  • Should You Even Bother? Making the Case for Bringing a Case

    Caroline Greenwell

    Events

    min read
  • Judgement Under Pressure: The General Counsel and In-House Counsel Role in the Built Environment

    Events

    min read
  • Greenwashing webinar

    Kerry Stares

    Events

    min read
  • HR Breakfast Club: The Employment Rights Act 2025: In Discussion with Matthew Taylor CBE, Chair of the new Fair Work Agency

    Nick Hurley

    Events

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys recognised with 28 new or improved individual rankings in Chambers UK 2027

    Simon Ridpath

    News

    min read
  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 4-6

    Events

    min read
  • Kathleen Bada comments in HR Magazine on the importance of robust disciplinary investigations

    Kathleen Bada

    In the Press

    min read
  • Sarah Jane Boon comments in the Law Society Gazette on the legal realities behind Sky’s divorce drama War

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

    min read
  • LCIA Publishes 2025 Case Statistics – What They Show

    Katy Ackroyd

    Insights

    min read
  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey on the risks of intestacy (dying without a valid will)

    Richard Honey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Law360 quotes Sadie Pitman on the planning considerations for Manchester United’s Old Trafford plans

    Sadie Pitman

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys contributes to Wolters Kluwer guide on international relocation and tax planning for high-net-worth individuals

    Piers Master

    In the Press

    min read
  • Annapaola Negri-Clementi, Giorgia Ligasacchi and Valeria Tommasi write in We Wealth about reforms to Italy’s cultural heritage laws

    Annapaola Negri-Clementi

    In the Press

    min read
  • The Bayeux Tapestry: threading the needle on art loans

    Suzanne Marriott

    Insights

    min read
  • Corporate Governance in Bahrain: A Practical Overview

    Jonathan Fisher

    Insights

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes in Building about the proposed ban on construction retentions

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
  • Kerry Stares is quoted in the ESG edition of Law UK

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Harriet Betteridge comments in Professional Adviser on the six-month countdown to UK pension inheritance tax changes

    Harriet Betteridge

    In the Press

    min read
  • The Global Legal Post quotes Lesley O'Leary on client relationship building in the age of AI

    Lesley O’Leary

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises longstanding client Hearthstone Investments on its acquisition by Sentinel Real Estate

    Edward Robinson

    News

    min read
Back to top