• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Infra.law - Autumn 2020

Welcome to the Autumn edition of our construction and infrastructure publication, Infra.Law.

Whilst COVID-19 continues to impact our personal and professional lives and the news cycles are dominated by COVID-19 stories, the UK courts have handed down a number of recent judgments which are not  related to COVID-19 but may well have a significant impact on the construction and infrastructure industry. Our Summer edition of Construct.law considered the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Bresco case, whilst this edition of Infra.Law looks at the courts’ decisions on the meaning of “design life” in construction contracts, the interpretation of indemnity provisions in sale and purchase agreements and the importance of clear and unambiguous wording in vesting certificates.

Paul Henty considers the implications of the Boohoo scandal and the Modern Slavery Act on the construction industry, whilst Niel Coertse and Glenn Bull consider the implications of termination for convenience clauses in Qatar and decennial liability in the Middle East respectively. Finally, the publication considers issues around apparent bias in arbitrations where arbitrators, experts and counsel have acted previously for the same clients and the need to disclose  potential conflicts of interest.

We hope you enjoy reading this edition of Infra.Law. Please get in touch if you would like to discuss any of the topics detailed within, or if there are any topics that you would like to read about in future editions.

Click here to read the full edition

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2025

    Simon Ridpath

    Events

  • UK tax considerations for US persons relocating to the UK

    Matthew Radcliffe

    Insights

  • Keeping compliant: Navigating SFO regulations globally

    Christopher Gothard

    Insights

  • Valuable assets protection from death, disputes, and divorce

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Q&As: The Evolution of Family Offices

    Amira Shaker-Bortman

    Insights

  • Parental responsibility = shared care… Or does it?

    Hilde Braaten Resseth

    Quick Reads

  • Next Gen: Upholding family values

    Elinor Boote

    Insights

  • Navigating Conditions Precedent: a comparative analysis of Contractual Practices in the Middle East and England & Wales

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

  • Relocation: Important factors to consider before moving

    Graeme Kleiner

    Insights

  • Last call for chefs and catering and bar managers

    Owen Chan

    Quick Reads

  • To share or not to share, that is the question. The Supreme Court hands down judgment in ‘big money’ divorce case Standish v Standish and clarifies the position regarding matrimonialisation and the sharing principle

    Miranda Fisher

    Insights

  • Joseph Evans, Ethan Khurwolah and Simon Heatley write for Thomson Reuters Practical Law on litigation funding and PACCAR

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Courts are not couples’ therapists - and that’s a good thing

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

  • City AM quotes Dominic Lawrance on the suitability of a non-dom tiered tax regime (TTR)

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • Next Gen Rural Professionals Drinks Reception

    Events

  • Bill Gates' Philanthropic Urgency: a catalyst for ESG

    Tabitha Collett

    Quick Reads

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Miranda Fisher on the upcoming Supreme Court Standish v Standish judgment

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys adopts Harvey

    Joe Cohen

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes highly regarded regulatory and investigations litigator Richard Burger in London

    Richard Burger

    News

  • Liz Gifford, Janine Regan and Courtney Benard write for New Law Journal on an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill which will allow UK charities to send direct marketing emails to supporters without prior opt-in consent

    Liz Gifford

    In the Press

Back to top