• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Drip Pricing and Enforcement: How the DMCC Act is Changing the Rules


The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers (DMCC) Act marks a significant shift in consumer protection law, targeting practices that mislead or disadvantage buyers. In this article, we examine what drip pricing entails, the legal risks it poses, and how the DMCC Act strengthens enforcement to protect consumers and level the playing field.

Drip pricing refers to the misleading practice of traders luring consumers with deceptively low headline rates, only for additional fees to be ‘dripped’ at checkout, which increases the final price paid by the consumer.

Instead, traders are required to provide to customers all mandatory charges for a product.

The DMCC deals with drip pricing by prohibiting traders from offering a headline price without including fixed mandatory charges such as VAT or associated booking fees. Mandatory charges need to be set out with equal prominence alongside the headline price, with details of how they are calculated.

Taking VAT as an example, a trader would state the VAT sum, being 20% of the sale price.

If it is not possible to accurately calculate the total price of a product in advance, any non-calculability of mandatory charges must strictly reflect the nature of the product - this is an objective issue.

Where the nature of product means there are mandatory charges that cannot reasonably be calculated in advance, information about how these charges will be calculated must be provided in advance to enable the consumer to calculate the total price of the product – for example, providing indicative prices or a full tariff of potential prices.

Traders should not deliberately structure products so that mandatory charges are hard to calculate in advance.

The drip pricing rules apply to both physical and non-physical products such as digital content, and any failure by the business to properly present information for the headline price will automatically be considered a misleading omission by the CMA, and therefore prohibited (and void for the consumer).

Further guidance from the CMA is expected for some of the legislation, especially regarding fixed-term periodic contracts and when delivery fees need to be included in the headline price. This is likely to be published in the autumn of this year so do keep an eye out!

Enforcing drip pricing

Looking ahead, when it comes to enforcing the DMCC and the priorities in doing so, the CMA is carefully considering early cases and is clear that it wants to take strategic actions which will have the maximum impact. In the first 12 months, the CMA will take a double pronged approach: so it is working to increase guidance available to businesses whilst it begins taking enforcement actions against the most egregious infringements.

Egregious infringements being actions which would always have been a breach of consumer laws, for example things like:

  • Aggressive sales practices that prey on vulnerability;
  • Providing objectively false information; and
  • Highly imbalanced and unfair contract terms. 

There will also clearly be a focus on the new banned practices of fake reviews and drip pricing and the CMA has also made clear that it is actively monitoring previous focus areas i.e. the CMA’s investigation into greenwashing within the fashion sector; the CMA’s investigation into hidden influencer marketing and the CMA’s investigations into misleading pricing practices (for example, urgency claims and unclear reference pricing).

The CMA is not looking to probe businesses who are taking steps toward compliance but don’t quite get it right, instead it is targeting those businesses who make minimal effort toward compliance and/or have a previous history of non-compliance.

As a business, you should be looking ahead to ensure you are complying with the new consumer law in the DMCC by:

  • Review processes – fake review policies, information and procedures for subscription contracts must be clear, accessible and easy to understand.
  • Monitor what the CMA is doing regarding enforcement. As these are new, it will take a while for it to become clear exactly what the CMA will be considering incompatible with the rules.

What’s Next?

In our video series, we also dive deeper into:

  • Subscriptions – How to design fair and compliant subscription models.
  • Fake Reviews – What constitutes a fake review and how to avoid penalties.

Stay tuned for practical insights and actionable guidance to help your business navigate these changes in the DMCC Act confidently.

Our thinking

  • Q&A: Signs and rights of way

    Oliver Park

    Insights

  • QICCA Conciliation Rules 2026 - scope, confidentiality and process at a glance

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Conway v Conway: Proprietary Estoppel, Family Promises and the Limits of Informality

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Joe Edwards and Laura Bushaway write for Property Week on changes to possession actions

    Joe Edwards

    In the Press

  • New statutory guidance on the Modern Slavery Act 2015 for supply chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • The UK Supreme Court to consider whether adoption orders can be set-aside on the basis of welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Budget 2025: Extension of Schedule A1 Inheritance Tax “look‑through” to UK agricultural property

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • Freezing Orders: how are they enforced around the world? England and Wales perspective

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Miranda Fisher on the rise in arbitration for divorces in England and Wales

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

  • Erell Bauduin comments in VOGUE Business on how leading companies approach succession strategy

    Erell Bauduin

    In the Press

  • Succession Planning in Family Investment Companies: What Should Families Consider?

    Mary Perham

    Quick Reads

  • Family Investment Companies: family values, succession and wealth stewardship

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

  • Through the looking glass - transparency in the family courts (reprised).

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Marcus Yorke-Long comments in Spears on the mediation of family wealth disputes

    Marcus Yorke-Long

    In the Press

  • The Results are in: AI on the Front Line of Alcohol Advertising Regulation

    Evie O'Connor

    Quick Reads

  • Technology Sector Lookahead 2026

    Mark Bailey

    Insights

  • Food & Beverage Lookahead 2026

    Rachel Bell

    Insights

  • AI in Advertising: A Regulatory Lookahead for 2026

    Willemijn Paul

    Insights

  • Payment Practices - the latest developments on reporting and late payments

    Willemijn Paul

    Insights

  • The Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act 2023 – practical impact since implementation

    Chiara Muston

    Insights

Back to top