• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Patents and Peppa Pig: What is happening to intellectual property rights in Russia?

min read

On 6 March 2022, the Russian government issued Decree No. 299, enabling certain Russian individuals and businesses to use patents, utility models and industrial designs without obtaining the prior permission of the owner.  The new decree, which suspended the usual licensing rules (where use of a patent, model or design without the owner’s consent may constitute infringement), was introduced as a response to economic sanctions imposed on Russia by various countries.   

The legal basis for the new decree is Article 1360 of the Russian Civil Code, which allows the Russian government in situations of extreme urgency to use patents without permission or a requirement to pay royalties in full, provided that it is deemed necessary for national security and to protect the life and health of Russian citizens.   

Under the new legislation, the Russian government can permit local businesses and individuals to use and sell patented technology and products without the owner’s consent in exchange for the owner receiving “proportional” economic compensation, provided that they are from a country that the Russian government does not deem to be carrying out “unfriendly” activities towards it.

On 5 March 2022, the Russian government published a list of 48 “unfriendly countries”, which included the UK, EU member states, the US, Canada, Ukraine, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Singapore and Taiwan.  It is unclear how frequently this list is being revised, but we expect [it] to grow if further countries introduce sanctions against Russia. 

If the intellectual property right holder is connected with an “unfriendly country”, the legislation states that the proportion of compensation they are entitled to is a flat rate of 0%, meaning that their rights can be freely infringed.  Connection to an “unfriendly country” includes individuals having citizenship and companies having a place of registration, principal place of business or principal place of receiving revenue in one of the countries.

It is currently unclear how long these new rules will apply, although it is reasonable to expect that they will last for the duration of the economic sanctions.

While the new legislation does not mention trade marks, a recent decision by a Russian commercial court regarding Ivan Vladimirovich Kozhevnikov’s use of two Peppa Pig trade marks provides an indication of the Russian courts’ attitude towards trade mark rights held by owners from “unfriendly countries”.

Kozhevnikov, a Russian entrepreneur, copied the word “PEPPA PIG” and a drawing of “Daddy Pig” both of which are valid trade marks in Russia and owned by Entertainment One UK Limited.

In September 2021, Entertainment One UK Ltd sued Kozhevnikov for trade mark infringement and requested around £400 in compensation.  In March 2022, the Russian court dismissed the claim on the basis that a UK company seeking compensation for trade mark infringement amounted to an “abuse of rights” under Article 10 of the Russian Civil Code in light of the UK’s sanctions regime against Russia – Judge Andrei Slavinsky explicitly stated that the “unfriendly actions of the United States of America and affiliated foreign countries” had influenced his decision.  The claimant was denied any compensation, although it will be able to appeal the decision.

The UK Intellectual Property Office (the UKIPO), the EU Intellectual Property Office (the EUIPO) and the World Intellectual Property Organisation have all condemned the war with Ukraine and advocated for peace.  Shortly before the legislation was introduced, the UKIPO released a statement reiterating that the UK’s economic sanctions against Russia included intellectual property and offering Ukrainian customers increased flexibility in respect of requests for extensions of time, reinstatements and restorations.  On 9 March 2022, after the decree was passed, the EUIPO announced that it had terminated all cooperation with Rospatent, the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property and the Eurasian Patent Organisation. 

The Ukrainian Intellectual Property Office published a statement on 22 March 2022 confirming that its trade mark department is still active and receiving trade mark applications. 

What lies ahead?

It is important for businesses with a significant presence in Russia to stay up to date with changes to intellectual property rights in the region, as it is possible that further restrictions may be introduced. 

It would also be advisable for those businesses to bolster enforcement of their intellectual property rights in countries bordering Russia, as these countries may be conduits for the distribution of counterfeit products produced in Russia to the EU.   

In the meantime, the UK government’s export support team is assisting businesses with questions or concerns about trading with Ukraine, Russia or Belarus and can be contacted using their online service at https://www.get-help-selling-goods-services-abroad.service.gov.uk/russia-ukraine-enquiry/russia-ukraine-enquiry or on 0300 303 8955.

For more information please contact Nick White, a Partner in the Intellectual Property Litigation department, at Nick.White@crsblaw.com.

Our thinking

  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Iwan Thomas comments in Business Green on the acquisition of Huel by Danone

    Iwan Thomas

    In the Press

    min read
  • Corporate restructuring: Preparing for Future Challenges

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

    min read
  • Chiara Muston comments in People Management on 'empty time' and the gig economy

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

    min read
  • Time to Pay Up: The Government Responds to the Late Payments Consultation

    Willemijn Paul

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Iwan Thomas comments in The Grocer on the potential sale of Unilever's food division

    Iwan Thomas

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens its position in the latest Legal 500 EMEA directory, with 22 firm rankings

    News

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Robert Lundie Smith as Head of Intellectual Property

    Robert Lundie Smith

    News

    min read
  • Dewdney William Drew contributes to Law360's Practice Leader Insights series

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

    min read
  • The BBC's Motion to Dismiss President Trump's $10 Billion Defamation Claim: Jurisdiction, Free Speech, and the "Chilling Effect"

    Claudine Morgan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Smaller appetites, bigger shifts: GLP‑1 is reshaping UK retail and M&A

    Iwan Thomas

    Insights

    min read
  • How Stakeholder Engagement and Grievance Mechanisms Strengthen Human Rights Due Diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • FoodBev quotes Iwan Thomas on the wave of recent divestments in the food and beverage sector

    Iwan Thomas

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys hires first IT, Data and AI Partner with leading digital health expertise in Paris

    Marguerite Brac de La Perrière

    News

    min read
  • Child Maintenance and Sport: A Game of Two Halves

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Understanding risk-based human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • AI and Data Protection

    Victor Mound

    Insights

    min read
  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

    min read
  • Iwan Thomas explores Nestlé’s ice cream exit in Food Manufacture

    Iwan Thomas

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top