• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Grab the tail by the horns - Why is tail spend so critical in today’s outsourced portfolio?

You may not be aware of it. It’s usually invisible, but in all likelihood, you’ve got tail spend. No, it’s not something your dog has; it’s essentially a high volume of (usually) low value supplier transactions in your spend portfolio.

Doesn’t sound like too much of an issue, does it – after all, the transactions are low value. But when you consider that this spend is usually considered as ‘maverick’, out of contract and unpredictable you start to see why this might be an issue. Even more so when the volume of suppliers which contribute to it could be as high as 80% and account for 20% of the overall spend of the business.

In larger corporates, a business may expect its procurement team to manage tail spend effectively. However, even with a sophisticated procurement team the nature of tail spend makes it difficult to analyse and therefore manage. Tail spend tends to be small value, unclassified and unknown to the procurement team. It’s the one-offs, the ‘I’ll just use my credit card for this’ or ‘I don’t have a PO so I’ll just …’ type of purchases.

However, a post-Covid working environment means that now, more than ever, businesses should be considering how to control their tail spend and better identify and implement opportunities for reducing transaction costs and increasing savings and ensuring staff are following the prescribed processes.  

What are the benefits in managing tail spend?

Put simply, it reduces cost and risk to the business. If an organisation is capable of identifying tail spend, the procurement team can then manage it – or put a stop to it – and ensure that the business can capitalise on savings opportunities. But the benefits go beyond immediate savings. Managing tail spend reduces unnecessary spend, de-risks supply chains and increases compliance with procurement and contracting processes, meaning that a business can better manage its suppliers, ensure proper contractual protections are in place and also allows the contract team to manage contract renewals, increase costs efficiencies and so the cycle continues. It also means that the procurement team can focus on strategically important spend critical for core business functions.   

So why do so many businesses not manage tail spend effectively? Tail spend attributes mean that it’s hard to analyse, difficult to control and so often falls into the ‘too hard basket’ of a procurement team who have larger, higher value, strategic purchases (often including lengthy tender processes and budget constraints) to dedicate their time to. Just the sheer volume of transactions can make tail spend management a mammoth task to undertake (while also performing the day job). It also might be that the procurement team simply don’t have the transaction data or the requisite systems to record or track it.

How to manage tail spend

The level of effort, expertise and time needed to initiate a project to properly analyse and manage tail spend means that implementing a digital solution is often seen as the quick fix. However, simply purchasing a digital tool doesn’t address all the challenges posed by tail spend. For example, a digital tool might solve the effort and time challenges but it doesn’t necessarily help with filling the expertise gap or future proofing the issue. In larger organisations with greater category variances, tail spend gets lost because the procurement team are focussed on larger, direct spend and therefore may not have the skill-set (or time) to understand indirect, ad hoc expenditure from a strategic perspective. This is when a third party with a user-friendly digital tool makes most sense. It’s often more cost efficient to engage a third party who can then offer this expertise, digital solution and best practice advice.

If a third-party specialist is not an option, one of the more cost-effective methods to reduce tail spend (albeit at a relatively glacial pace) is to implement or improve processes and policies. Even if a business does engage a digital tool – or a third-party – simple to follow but effective (and enforceable!) processes and policies will be needed as without these old habits can sneak back in to. To achieve best practice, organisations should ensure that spend is reviewed by the procurement function and the legal team are engaged to ensure contracts are in place for all spend. This frees up the procurement team to focus on their core function and can be the most cost-efficient way of ensuring tail spend is managed now and in the future.

If you would like more information on commercial and managing tale spend please contact Megan Paul or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact. 

Our thinking

  • Mental Health Management

    Nick Hurley

    Events

  • Arbitration Act 1996: Law Commission recommends limited changes

    Richard Kiddell

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Nortal on its acquisition of Questers

    Hamish Perry

    News

  • Family and Employment law assistance in legal advice deserts

    Sarah Farrelly

    News

  • Property Patter: the latest on the Building Safety Act

    Richard Flenley

    Podcasts

  • James Souter writes for City AM on Meta pulling out of its London office

    James Souter

    In the Press

  • A Labour government: what might be in store for personal taxation?

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Drone deliveries: Be Prepared

    Emma Humphreys

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Private Equity on its £3.5 million investment into TravelLocal

    David Coates

    News

  • The Evening Standard quotes Rose Carey on the increase in visa fees

    Rose Carey

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Zenzero’s management team on its majority acquisition by Macquarie Capital

    Mark Howard

    News

  • David Savage writes for Construction News on the upcoming building-control overhaul

    David Savage

    In the Press

  • Updates and points to note in relation to buy-to-let residential properties

    Twiggy Ho

    Insights

  • Felicity Chapman writes for Insider Media on alternatives to court for divorcing business owners

    Felicity Chapman

    In the Press

  • Investment Week quotes Julia Cox on the proposed scrapping of inheritance tax

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys expands commercial offering with the appointment of Rebecca Steer

    Rebecca Steer

    News

  • The Times quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s preliminary approval of the Activision Blizzard-Microsoft deal

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Heritage property and conditional exemption

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • Property Week quotes Cara Imbrailo on Rishi Sunak scrapping MEES requirements for residential landlords

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • The Financial Times quotes Emma Humphreys on UK rental costs

    Emma Humphreys

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Gareth Mills on the CMA’s new set of principles for regulating AI

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Hamish Perry and Mike Barrington write for The Evening Standard on whether a merger between the CBI and Make UK can work

    Hamish Perry

    In the Press

  • Office to Lab Conversions: A new lease of life (sciences) for some of London’s offices?

    Georgina Muskett

    Quick Reads

  • The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • The perpetual struggle between the environment, heritage and development: the M&S decision vs 55 Bishopsgate

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

    Lia Renna

    Quick Reads

  • Oops!....I did it again - Britney's third divorce

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Product compliance and Brexit - UK Government concedes to CE markings indefinite recognition

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Recognising financial abuse in a relationship

    Vanessa Duff

    Quick Reads

  • Has the Orpéa plan impaired shareholder's consent? - Le plan de sauvegarde d'Orpéa n'a-t-il pas vicié le consentement des actionnaires historiques ?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Will the downturn in the Paris region property market lead property companies to turn to ad hoc proceedings, as they did in the 1990s?

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Les défaillances en France proches de leur niveau de 2019 - French insolvencies close to 2019 levels

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Making BitCoin a BitClearer

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Casino Group: An agreement with investors and debt holders is expected at the end of July

    Dimitri-André Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • DIAC Issues First Annual Report

    Georgia Fullarton

    Quick Reads

  • One year on: "Influencer Culture: lights, camera, inaction" remains astonishingly accurate

    Caroline Swain

    Quick Reads

  • Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration publishes new Arbitration Rules

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Key takeaways from the UK Government's "Green Day"

    Martha Glaser

    Quick Reads

  • From Holby City to 5 Fleet Place - David Ames shares his experience of "Behind the Lens" with CRS

    Quick Reads

  • The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 in Action

    Sophia Leeder

    Quick Reads

Back to top