• news-banner

    Expert Insights

Insurance Outsourcing

In a statement published on 8 July 2020, the FCA has confirmed that the recent European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) guidelines on outsourcing to cloud service providers for insurance and reinsurance undertakings will not be applicable to regulated activities within the UK’s jurisdiction, as the guidelines will enter into force on 1 January 2021 after the EU withdrawal transition period is expected to end, and Brexit is finally fully effective.

The FCA has advised it will continue to apply the FCA guidance on firms outsourcing to the cloud (finalised guidance FG16/5 updated September 2019) for insurance firms within the scope of its regulatory supervision.

While the FCA’s approach may result in some reduced obligations for FCA regulated firms that are purely UK based, the notification obviously does not exclude the application of the EIOPA guidelines to businesses operating within Europe, and as such businesses operating in multiple territories, or who will harmonise to global or international standards will still take account of the EIOPA guidelines. On this basis, many firms will consider the application of the EIOPA Guidelines still to be relevant and therefore it is important for such firms to undertake a mapping exercise to understand the areas of overlap as well as any differences between the different guidelines.

The EIOPA guidelines are harmonised with existing regulation for banking and financial services, including the European Banking Association (EBA) guidelines on which the EIOPA guidelines are based.

The PRA which also regulates insurance and reinsurance firms and groups in scope of Solvency II, including the Society of Lloyd’s and managing agents is also currently consulting on outsourcing, having issued a consultation paper CP30/19 in December 2019, which expressly takes into account the EIOPA guidelines and the EBA guidelines also. Consultation feedback is expected this Autumn, so it will be interesting to see whether the references to EIOPA guidelines are adjusted as a result of the FCA’s now stated position.

This means that insurers will need to do careful analysis of applicable outsourcing guidelines, and decide whether to harmonise systems and processes for cloud services to the EBA benchmark as well as to FCA guidance, or adopt a more limited approach where the existing FCA guidance alone will apply. More generally, cloud and infrastructure providers providing services in the financial services sector, or firms with dual regulation, may have to perform an analysis of the differences between applicable UK and EU guidelines, including the EIOPA guidelines, as well as being mindful of any changes to the draft supervisory statement issued by the PRA once finalised.

Given the international multi tenant nature of the cloud, many insurers and vendors will choose to harmonise to a more general standard. In practice, therefore, the announcement may do little to assist insurers and vendors where standardisation and common procedures are more likely to enable consistent service performance and operational resilience. It is however encouraging that the FCA’s statement provides with regard to its guidance FG16/5 “We will keep this guidance under review and, where appropriate, consult to update this to ensure it remains consistent with relevant international standards.”

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hires first IT, Data and AI Partner with leading digital health expertise in Paris

    Marguerite Brac de La Perrière

    News

  • Understanding Vacant Possession: A Key Element in Property Transactions

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • Year of the Horse Celebration

    Edith Lai

    Events

  • Martyn’s Law: What Historic Houses Need to Know

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • Chandni Pandya contributes to an Estates Gazette Q&A on the modification of restrictive covenants

    Chandni Pandya

    In the Press

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Members of joint ventures cannot unilaterally bring adjudication proceedings on behalf of their joint venture

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • Understanding risk-based human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Residential PEEPs Breakfast Panel

    Richard Flenley

    Events

  • Commonhold: Best Supporting Tenure or Leading Role?

    Sarah Bradd

    Quick Reads

  • AI and Data Protection

    Victor Mound

    Insights

  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Biodiversity Net Gain: VAT considerations for Land Managers

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes Francis Ho on John Lewis shelving its build-to-rent property plans

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey and Charlotte Hill on how the Property (Digital Assets) Act in the UK is impacting private clients

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Navigating ESG Regulatory Change in Supply Chain Contracts

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

Back to top