• news-banner

    Expert Insights

All bets are off: ASA rules Betway YouTube video breached the CAP Code

On 8 January 2020, the Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”) found Betway Ltd (“Betway”) had breached the age restrictions contained in the CAP Code in relation to a video published on its YouTube account featuring footballer Declan Rice.

What was the video about?

The YouTube video showed West Ham’s captain, Mark Noble “pranking” his clubmate Declan Rice by arranging for his car to be clamped by an actor posing as a traffic warden. The video depicted a number of other individuals all wearing West Ham football shirts which prominently feature Betway’s logo. The tagline was “HEED YOUR HUNCH” and the video ended with the words “betway” and “bet the responsible way. 18+ begambleaware.org”.

Why was the video challenged?

The video was challenged on the basis that it prominently featured Declan Rice, aged 20, contrary to the UK Code of Non-broadcast Advertising and Direct & Promotional Marketing (the “CAP Code”). Under rule 16.3.14, no one who is, or seems to be under the age of 25 can play a significant role in marketing communications (save for under a limited exemption for marketing communications that include a transactional facility).

Betway argued the video simply depicted a prank, rather than an advert containing promotional content, and as such the video fell outside the scope of “a marketing communication” for the purposes of the CAP Code. Betway argued that Declan Rice was not portrayed in a sporting context, there was no reference to a specific market and there was no link to its website where a bet could be placed. For these reasons, Betway contended the material was editorial as opposed to an advertisement.

The ASA’s ruling and reasoning

The ASA disagreed with Betway’s assessment and found the video had contravened rule 16.3.14 of the CAP Code.

The ASA considered the video was promoting the Betway brand. The branded West Ham shirts featured heavily in the material, viewers would be able to place bets on the footballers featured in the video at some point in the future and the video ended with the brand’s name and the claim “bet the responsible way. 18+ begambleaware.org”. Further, the ASA considered the tagline “HEED YOUR HUNCH” encouraged viewers to consider betting. For these reasons the YouTube video was directly connected with the supply of Betway’s services and came within the scope of the CAP Code.

The ASA said that as Declan Rice featured in the video for its entire duration, he played a significant role in a marketing communication. Accordingly, as Declan Rice is under the age of 25 years old, the video contravened the CAP Code and must not appear again in its original form.

What does this mean for advertisers?

The ASA’s ruling on Betway serves as a reminder to brands using platforms such as YouTube to consider the relevant advertising regulations before posting promotional content. Advertisers should take care not to feature individuals who are under the age of 25 in a significant role in marketing communications on social media.

A link to the ASA’s full ruling can be found here.

For more information please contact Tessa Newman on +44 (0)20 7203 8843 or at Tessa.Newman@crsblaw.com.

Our thinking

  • Jamie Cartwright writes for Independent Schools Magazine on how VAT on private school fees is shaping the future of the independent education sector

    Jamie Cartwright

    In the Press

  • Magnum spins out of Unilever: a clearer investment story but a cool valuation

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

  • Licence to Till: what happens when a ‘Grazing Licence’ is really a tenancy? Accidental tenancies, shams and documents that just don’t do what they say on the tin…

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Georgina Muskett writes for Property Week on the conundrum of green leasing

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • Paramount launches hostile bid for the entirety of Warner Bros

    Grace Hudson

    Quick Reads

  • Property Patter: Top 5 Changes under the new Renters’ Rights Act 2025

    Lauren Fraser

    Podcasts

  • DMCCA: What the UK’s new consumer rules now mean for consumer facing businesses

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Transactions at an undervalue: trusts of land

    Roger Elford

    Insights

  • Ministry of Sound Limited v. The British Foreign Wharf Company Limited (and ors): Balancing terms of a renewal lease with redevelopment potential

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises FIRST and its shareholders on sale to Encore

    Mark Howard

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises longstanding client Puma Growth Partners on its investment in HubBox

    Ashwin Pillay

    News

  • Candy Kittens takes a bite as Unilever slims down

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Budget 2025 – Inheritance Tax (IHT) and charitable gifts

    Richard Honey

    Insights

  • Advocacy: Lessons from The Mandela Brief for International Arbitration Today

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

  • The Times, City AM and the Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on government plans to remove the cap on unfair dismissal claims

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • Promises and probate: when is “detriment” worth the family farm and what happens when a promise is only relied on for a defined period?

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

  • UAE CCL Reforms: Introducing Multi-Class Shares, Drag / Tag Rights, Deadlock Solutions and Governance Continuity

    Mo Nawash

    Quick Reads

  • Retail Showcase - Festive Special

    Events

  • Property Week quotes Andrew Ross on the case of Romal Capital v Peel Holdings

    Andrew Ross

    In the Press

  • James Stewart writes for Tax Journal on changes to the share exchanges and reorganisation rules in the 2025 Budget

    James Stewart

    In the Press

Back to top