WELCOME TO CHARLES RUSSELL SPEECHLYS.
We would like to place strictly necessary cookies and performance cookies on your computer to improve our website service.
Otherwise, we'll assume you are OK to continue. Please close this message
There are many definitions of Building Information Modelling (BIM). The UK based Royal Institution of British Architects has proposed the following definition of BIM as a starting point for discussion and refinement:
'Building Information Modelling is digital representation of physical and functional characteristics of a facility creating a shared knowledge resource for information about it forming a reliable basis for decisions during its life cycle, from earliest conception to demolition.'
The UK Department for Business Innovation and Skills refers to BIM as:
"a managed approach to the collection and exploitation of information across a project. At its heart is a computer-generated model containing all graphical and tabular information about the design, construction and operation of the asset."
To ensure clear articulation of the levels of competence expected from suppliers, the UK is currently referring to four different maturity levels of BIM:
In reality, the construction industry - whether in the UK or internationally - is still a long way from achieving Level 3 BIM maturity, not least because of the technological challenges in creating a single manageable BIM model. It is more likely that each party will continue to maintain its own model with a common interface facilitating collaboration and the sharing of information between models. It is also likely to be some time before the lower rungs of the supply chain is ready to receive anything other than paper drawings or 2D CAD drawings.
The shift from level 0 to level 3 BIM has been compared to the shift from drafting on tracing paper to CAD. Others say that the shift is more fundamental than that, because the later shift did not change the output (2D drawings) but simply the delivery mechanism (ie tracing paper to PDFs etc). In contrast, the shift from 0 to level 3 BIM requires:
It is claimed that, depending on the level achieved, BIM has the potential to provide many benefits on construction and engineering projects at all levels of scale. These are stated to include:
However, while BIM undoubtedly has the potential to deliver significant benefits to clients, contractors and consultants, a recent UK industry survey found 21% of respondents reporting that they were unaware of BIM, and only 31% saying that they were currently using BIM at any level on their projects.
Of those respondents who were aware of BIM but had not yet adopted it, 63% agreed that it was too expensive to consider at the moment. Clearly the current economic environment may have some effect on the rate of adoption, although some respondents commented that there was more staff time available for training and implantation.
Although not explicitly identified by the survey, concerns have also been expressed regarding the legal implications of adopting BIM. This paper will now consider some of these legal implications.
Level 2 BIM is unlikely to require significant amendments to the core terms of most contracts. However, a well drafted BIM protocol will be essential and care should be taken to ensure the schedule of services for each designer properly reflects their duties and responsibilities in relation to BIM.
The contractual requirements for BIM should be embodied in a BIM protocol for each project. This protocol should then be incorporated by reference into the relevant standard form contracts or professional appointment documents on the basis of a simple additional clause.
Dispute resolution provisions can remain unchanged (although the practicalities of identifying contributions by design team members and consequent liability may become
progressively more complex – see below).
There will be an even greater need to clearly spell out the extent of each designer’s responsibilities. Additional duties will need to be defined in the schedules of services for professional appointments describing the additional services and outputs that might result from a BIM based project. A good starting point in this regard is the RIBA produced “BIM Overlay” to the RIBA Outline Plan of Work.
It is hoped that, overall, increased use of BIM should actually help to de-risk projects for all concerned. For example, BIM should facilitate the identification of design clashes at an early stage, thereby dramatically reducing the impact of such conflicts.
There are always some initial risks associated with the introduction of new technology, while staff gain familiarity with the software and new working practices. Adequate training is essential to minimise these risks.
As the increasingly mature use of BIM facilitates collaboration and joint authorship of designs, it may become progressively more complex from a practical perspective to clearly establish liability where errors do occur, although the technology should at least provide a clear audit trail of design changes.
It may be impossible to manage the contractual implications of the truly integrated single model envisaged by Level 3 BIM without a fundamental shift away from the traditional adversarial approach to construction. Before the economic downturn there was already a move towards the principles of partnering and collaborative working.
Adoption of integrated project insurance at higher levels of BIM integration may be prudent (or indeed essential) given the potential for increased difficulty in establishing the parties’ respective liabilities. Current insurance provisions in the construction industry can be viewed as supporting a blame/liability culture, which in turn results in a ‘silo’ mentality. The full benefits of collaborative working are more likely to be realised if the contractual and insurance arrangements support a team environment.
In the meantime, professional indemnity insurers will be concerned to see that their insured parties do not inadvertently extent their liability; for example, by taking responsibility for integrating the design of other collaborators or assuming overall
responsibility for accuracy of the model.
In the US, where the use of BIM is slightly more widespread1 , it was reported that the first BIM lawsuit arose in relation to the construction of a life-sciences building at a major university. Apparently the architect and MEP engineer used BIM to fit the building’s MEP systems into the ceiling plenum. However, the design team failed to inform the contractor that the BIM design required a very specific installation sequence, leading to predictably disastrous results during construction. The dispute was subsequently settled by the parties’ insurers.
However it is debatable, to say the least, whether BIM can fairly be blamed for this litigation. It seems that the real cause was a simple failure to communicate, which could equally occur on a CAD or paper designed project.
The majority of documents (whether electronic or paper) produced in the construction of a building will be protected. Copyright generally vests in the author of the work rather than the party which commissioned the work. Where a work is made by an employee in the course of his employment, the employer will be the first owner of copyright in the work, subject to any agreement to the contrary.
Copyright gives the owner the exclusive right to authorise or prohibit the exploitation of copyright work by others. Therefore, a person with a legitimate requirement to use the copyright work (eg the developer or a collaborating consultant or contractor) will either need a licence or an assignment of the copyright ownership. A BIM model might also fall within the definition of database for the purposes of database right. Database right exists independently of any copyright in a database and protects the compilation of information comprising the database.
Database right is infringed if a person extracts or re-utilises all or a substantial part of the contents of the database without the owner's permission.
Standard building contracts and appointments usually contain provisions dealing with the use of copyright materials. However, in some cases the wording may require some redrafting to reflect the wider ranges of uses for copyright material held in a BIM environment and to cover other intellectual property rights such as database rights. The parties will need to consider the increased likelihood of joint authorship, which is likely to rise where parties collaborate to produce a single model.
Designers should consider whether they require any restrictions on the post-completion use of copyright material. Designers may also wish to consider holding commercially sensitive data separately from the BIM model, so that it cannot be freely accessed by other project participants.
We are currently in a period of uncertainty. Anecdotally it appears that many private developers remain to be convinced of the benefits of BIM, particularly given the requirement to fund a greater initial investment in design fees, although some major developers and contractors are more progressive in this regard. It is also encouraging to see an increasing number of consultants adopting BIM of their own volition, in order to remain competitive and to realise the internal efficiency benefits.
It contractual terms, the standard forms of contract tend to lag behind developments in the industry and the emergence of BIM is no exception. As always, the position taken by insurance industry is likely to be a key driver of any change in contractual arrangements.
For the time being, well advised parties adopting BIM should do their best to anticipate the likely issues and ensure that their contracts make proper provision for the risks.
This article was written by David Savage.
For more information please contact David on +44 (0)1483 252 614 or email@example.com