WELCOME TO CHARLES RUSSELL SPEECHLYS.
We would like to place strictly necessary cookies and performance cookies on your computer to improve our website service.
Otherwise, we'll assume you are OK to continue. Please close this message
The CC has announced its provisional decision on remedies in the private healthcare market investigation, in order to address the adverse effects on competition provisionally identified.
The provisional remedies include both divestment and behavioural remedies: the CC is proposing the divestment of nine hospitals and also a remedy which would require transactions between NHS Trusts and private hospital operators to operate private patient units to be reviewed by the OFT/CMA on the basis of a competition test.
Further, it is proposing to restrict certain clinician incentives, to require collection and publication of information on performance, and to require consultants to make fee information available in a standard form.
The European Commission has published its decision rejecting Ryanair’s complaint against the Dublin Airport Authority (DAA) and Aer Lingus Group Plc. Ryanair claimed that DAA and Aer Lingus had colluded to develop policies that rewarded Aer Lingus for moving to a new terminal at the airport, in breach of Article 101 TFEU.
Further, Ryanair claimed that DAA’s charges represented excessive pricing, discrimination and bundling, in breach of Article 102 TFEU. The Commission has decided that there are insufficient grounds for conducting a further investigation into the alleged infringements and a small likelihood of establishing a breach of either Article 101 or Article 102 TFEU. In addition, the Commission believes that the Irish Competition Authority or national courts are well-placed to handle this matter.
The General Court has rejected as inadmissible an appeal by 1.garantovana (1G) against the European Commission's decision to impose interest on 1G’s payment of the fine imposed on it for participation in the calcium carbide cartel. The General Court had granted interim measures suspending the obligation on 1G to pay the fine or to provide a bank guarantee pending the outcome of its appeal against the Commission's cartel decision.
The appeal was dismissed in December 2012, following which the Commission demanded payment of the fine and imposing interest of 4.5% for the period during which the fine had been suspended. 1G sought annulment of the Commission's letter, however the General Court has ruled that the Commission's letter did not contain any decision that may be the subject of an action for annulment as it did not produce legal effects that changed 1G's legal position.