WELCOME TO CHARLES RUSSELL SPEECHLYS.
We would like to place strictly necessary cookies and performance cookies on your computer to improve our website service.
Otherwise, we'll assume you are OK to continue. Please close this message
Individuals who have exerted “significant control” over a UK company through nominees, other third parties and complex legal structures need to prepare themselves for a brave new world of full disclosure. The UK government is leading the way in the G20 in publicising the beneficial ownership of companies in order to increase trust in, and enhance the transparency of, UK companies. International concerns over the misuse of companies and other structures in the commission of money laundering, tax evasion and bribery have led to the UK’s innovative approach.
The new measures which are to come into force on a phased basis up to October 2016 are meant to make it easier to identify the individuals who influence the decisions about how a company is run and/or ultimately own that company. The key development is the requirement for all companies that are not currently subject to a public disclosure regime to maintain a “register of people with significant control” – to be known as the “PSC Register”.
The PSC Register will contain information on individuals who ultimately own or control more than 25% of a company’s shares or voting rights, who have the right to appoint and remove a majority of the board, or who otherwise exercise control over a company. Companies will have to prepare this register in time for an anticipated January 2016 commencement date. Then, from April 2016, companies will have to provide the information contained in the PSC Register to Companies House.
Crucially and most controversially, that information filed at Companies House will be searchable by the public and not just the authorities. Companies House will maintain an online system much like its current arrangements for corporate information.
In addition, persons with significant control will be under a corresponding duty to disclose their status to the company (whether in response to a request for disclosure from a company or if the company has simply failed to identify their status). Criminal sanctions will apply to companies, their directors, and relevant individuals or legal entities who fail to comply.
This sea change in corporate reporting stems from a global initiative designed to tackle economic crime. For example:
It will be interesting to see how the UK approach plays out and whether any other members of the G20 approach this issue in the same way. But, before any lessons are learned, companies with complex ownership structures will face a time-consuming, expensive and sensitive operation in identifying exactly who should be listed on the PSC Register and individuals who have, to date, guarded their privacy carefully, whether for tax or other reasons, should take legal advice.
This article was written by Rhys Novak.